Southern Strategies: Preaching, Prejudice, and Power
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2014.34.0.299-316Abstract
This paper considers how 'preaching prejudice' builds a constituency of like-minds by marginalizing others-on grounds of race and sexuality, for example-and then instructs this constituency regarding political behavior. This discussion is part of a larger project on the construction of social values for political gain but here I specifically draw attention to the historical racism marking much of Protestant messaging in the American South and to how this racism became the foundation for the Republican Southern Strategy from the 1970s onwards. In doing so, I take as a case study the well documented racism associated with the history of the Southern Baptist Convention. The SBC historical narrative exemplifies the racism which underpinned the Southern Strategy. This is interesting because the SBC continues to be a key political actor among social conservatives in the South. This historical narrative indicates how 'preaching prejudice' became a political tool fueling the racism of Nixon's campaign and seasoning subsequent campaigns. The paper then suggests that the most recent innovation of this familiar, well honed political tool can be located in contemporary discourse on same-sex marriage.
References
Adam, Barry D. 2003. The Defense of Marriage Act and American Exceptionalism: The 'Gay Marriage' Panic in the United States. Journal of the History of Sexuality 12(2). https://doi.org/10.1353/sex.2003.0074
Anderson, John. 1998. Former governor shaped politics of Alabama, nation. The Huntsville Times, Huntsville, Alabama, September 14, pp. A1, A8.
Ball, Carlos A. 2006. The Backlash Thesis and Same-Sex Marriage: Learning from Brown v. Board of Education and Its Aftermath. Wm. & Mary Bill of Rts. J. 14(4):1493-1538.
Berlet, Chip, ed. 1995. Eyes Right! Boston, MA: South End Press.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1992. The Vital South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734579
Black, Merle. 2004. The Transformation of the Southern Democratic Party. The Journal of Politics 66(4):1001-1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00287.x'>https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2004.00287.x
Bolcer, Julie. 2011. Mehlman Lobbies for New York Marriage. The Advocate, July 7, http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily News/2011/06/07/Mehlman_Lobbies_for_New_York_Marriage/.
Boyd, James. 1970. Nixon's Southern strategy. The New York Times, pp. 25, 105-106.
Brewer, Marilynn. 1999. The Psychology of Prejudice: Ingroup Love or Outgroup Hate? Journal of Social Issues 55(3):429-444. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00126
Brown, Frank. 2004. Nixon's 'Southern Strategy' and Forces against Brown. The Journal of Negro Education 73(3):190-208. https://doi.org/10.2307/4129605
Buchanan, P. 1992, Speech can be accessed at http://buchanan.org/blog/1992-republican-national-convention-speech-148.
Buchanan, P. 2002. The Death of the West. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Calfano, Brian R., Paul A. Djupe, and Angelia R. Wilson. 2013. God Talk in the UK. Politics and Religion.
Connolly, William. 2008. Capitalism and Christianity, American Style. Durham, NC: Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381235
Cooper, Davina. 2006. Active Citizenship and the Governmentality of Local Lesbian and Gay Politics. Political Geography 25:921-943 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2006.08.009
Cureton, Kenyn. 2011. The Culture Impact Team Resource Manual. Washington DC: Family Research Council.
Dao, James. 2004. State Action Is Pursued on Same-Sex Marriage, New York Times, February 27, p. A24.
Dowland, Seth. 2009. 'Family Values' and the Formation of a Christian Right Agenda. Church History 78(3):606-631. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009640709990448
Egerton, John. 1974. The Americanization of Dixie: The Southernization of America. Harper's Magazine.
Evangelicals and Catholics Together. 1994. http://www.firstthings.com/article/2007/01/evangelicals--catholics-together-the-christian-mission-in-the-third-millennium-2.
Fairclough, Norman. 1989. Language and Power. London: Longman.
FreedomWorks, 2010 Press Release, July 14. http://www.freedomworks.org/press-releases/freedomworks-responds-to-naacp-allegations-of-raci, accessed January 7, 2011.
George, Timothy. 1997. Evangelicals and Catholics Together: A New Initiative. Christianity Today http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/1997/december8/7te034.html.
Greenburg, David. 2007. Dog-Whistling Dixie. Slate, November. http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/history_lesson/2007/11/dogwhistling_dixie.html.
Gregory, James. 1998. Southernizing the American Working Class. Labor History 39(2):135-154. https://doi.org/10.1080/00236679812331387310
Gusfield, Joseph. 1963. Symbolic Crusade. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Guth, J.L., L.A. Kellstedt, C.E. Smidt, and J.C. Green. 2006. Religious Influences in the 2004 Presidential Election. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36:223-242. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.00300.x
Hancock, A.M. 2004. The Politics of Disgust. New York: New York University Press.
Harvey, Paul. 1998. 'Yankee Faith' and Southern Redemption. In Religion and the American Civil War, eds. Randall M. Miller, Harry S. Stout, and Charles Reagan Wilson. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Herbert, Bob. 2005. An empty Apology. New York Times, July 18, http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/18/opinion/18herbert.html.
Herman, Didi. 1998. The Antigay Agenda: Orthodox Vision and the Christian Right. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Katzenstein, P.J. 1987. Policy and Politics in West Germany: The Growth of a Semi-sovereign State. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Kuo, David. 2006. Tempting Faith: An Inside Story of Political Seduction. New York: Free Press.
Leonard, Mary. 2004. SJC Ruling Aftermath: Mass. Rulings Push States to Seek a Ban. Boston Globe, February 7.
Lindsey, D.M. 2007. Faith in the Halls of Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lindsey, D.M., and C. Hackett. 2008. Measuring Evangelicalism: Consequences of Different Operationalization Strategies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47(3):499-514. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2008.00423.x
Maddux, Kirsty. 2010. The Faithful Citizen. Waco, TX: Baylor University Press.
Manow, P. 2004. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Esping-Andersen's Regime Typology and the Religious Roots of the Western Welfare State. MPIfG Working Paper 04/3. Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Köln.
Mantyla, Kyle. 2010. FRC Defends Southern Strategy as Just How You Win Votes in the South. People for the American Way, http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/frc-defends-use-southern-strategy-completely-redefining-it.
McKivigan, J., and Mitchell Snay, eds. 1998. Religion and the Antebellum Debate over Slavery. Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Norris, P., and R. Inglehart. 2004. Sacred and Secular. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791017
PBS. 2010. God in America. http://www.pbs.org/godinamerica/, accessed September 10, 2011.
Phillips, Kevin. 2006. American Theocracy. New York: Penguin.
Posner, Sarah. 2008. God's Profits. Sausalito, CA: PoliPointPress.
Sears, Alan, and Craig Osten. 2003. The Homosexual Agenda. Nashville, TN: B&H Books.
Shibley, Mark. 1991. The Southernization of American Religion: Testing a Hypothesis. Sociological Analysis 52:159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/3710961
Smith, A.M. 2007. Welfare Reform and Sexual Regulation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619106
Smith, Oram P. 1997. The Rise of Baptist Republicanism. New York: New York University Press.
Snay, Mitchell. 1989. American Thought and Southern Distinctiveness. Civil War History 35(4):311-328. https://doi.org/10.1353/cwh.1989.0011
Snay, Mitchell. 1993. Gospel of Disunion. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511572487
Wildman, Sarah. 2004. Wedding-Bell Blues. Prospect, December.
Williams, Daniel. 2010. God's Own Party. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195340846.001.0001
Wilson, Angelia R. 2009. Jesus is Their Health Care Provider. The Guardian Comment is Free, http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/oct/O1.
Wilson, Angelia R., and Cynthia Burack. 2012. Where Liberty Reigns and God is Supreme. New Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1080/07393148.2012.676395
Wilson, Angelia R. 2013, forthcoming. Why Europe is Lesbian and Gay Friendly (and why America never will be). Albany: State University of New York.
Zernike, Kate. 2010. Bush Aide? No Bombshell in Age of Fiscal Cares. New York Times, August 26, http://www.nytimes.com/2010/08/27/us/politics/27mehlman.html?ref=kenmehlman.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.