A Mix of Motives

The Georgia Delegate Challenge to the 1968 Democratic Convention and the Dynamics of Intraparty Conflict

  • Sam Rosenfeld Colgate University
  • Nancy Schwartz Wesleyan University

Abstract

Scholarly debates over the nature of political parties and the identity of their principal actors have been hampered by relative inattention to the historical processes of internal party change. This study, drawing on archival sources, interviews, and one of the co-author’s personal experiences, analyzes the Georgia delegate challenge to the 1968 Democratic Convention as a case of internal party conflict generating lasting institutional reform, with implications for existing theories of party development, nominating politics, and democratic representation. In a convention marked by an unusually large number of challenges to state party delegations, the Georgia delegate challenge was unique. There, a conflict between the segregationist regulars and the moderate and liberal Democrats was complicated by an internal division in the latter camp between Hubert Humphrey and Eugene McCarthy supporters. The McCarthy forces’ success in garnering a dominant position within the challenge delegation alienated many of the Georgia movement’s organizers and leaders. The McCarthy campaign's takeover also linked this southern challenge both to the antiwar politics coloring the national nomination fight and to a particular conception of representation that would influence subsequent party reform efforts. In tracing the origins, dynamics, and aftermath of Georgia’s delegate challenge, we show both that group- and candidate-driven efforts together shape party development over time, and that normative ideas concerning representation can play causal roles in party development.

References

Agnew, John A. (1987). Place and Politics: The Geographical Mediation of State and Society. Winchester, MA: Allen & Unwin, Inc.

American National Election Studies (www.electionstudies.org). These materials are based on work supported by the National Science Foundation under grant numbers SES 1444721,2014-2017, the University of Michigan, and Stanford University.

Associated Press-NORC Long-Term Care Poll, 2013-2018. (2018).

Bell, Michael. (1992). “The Fruit of Difference: The Rural-Urban Continuum as a System of Identity.” Rural Sociology 57 (1): 65-82. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1549-0831.1992.tb00457.x

Bishop, Bill. (2009). The Big Sort: Why the Clustering of Like-Minded America is Tearing Us Apart. Mariner Books.

Blokland, Talja & Mike Savage. (2001). “Networks, Class and Place.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 25 (2): 221-26. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.00308

Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, & Donald E. Stokes. (1960). The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Cho, Wendy K. Tam, James G. Gimpel, & Iris S. Hui. (2013). Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(4), 856-870. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2012.720229

Clinton, Bill. (1996). State of the Union Address. January 23, 1996. https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/New/other/sotu.html

Conover, P. J., & Feldman, S. (1981). The origins and meaning of liberal/conservative self- identifications. American Journal of Political Science, 617-645. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2110756

Cramer, Katherine J. (2016). The Politics of Resentment: Rural Consciousness and the Rise of Scott Walker. University of Chicago Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226349251.001.0001

Ellis, Christopher & Stimson, James. (2012). Ideology in America. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139094009

Gimpel, James G., and Jason E. Schuknecht. (2003). Patchwork Nation: Sectionalism and Political Change in American Politics. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.17820

Goren, P. (2003). Race, Sophistication, and White Opinion on Government Spending. Political Behavior, 25(3), 201-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025121406460

Goren, P. (2008). The Two Faces of Government Spending. Political Research Quarterly, 61(1), 147-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912907311881

Green, Donald P., Bradley Palmquist, and Eric Schickler. (2002). Partisan Hearts and Minds: Political Parties and the Social Identities of Voters. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Hopkins, David. (2017). Red Fighting Blue: How Geography and Electoral Rules Polarize American Politics. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108123594

Huckfeldt, R., Levine, J., Morgan, W., & Sprague, J. (1999). Accessibility and the Political Utility of Partisan and Ideological Orientations. American Journal of Political Science, 43(3), 888-911. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2991839

Ingram D.D & Franco S.F. (2014). 2013 NCHS Urban-Rural Classification Scheme for Counties. National Center for Health Statistics. Vital Health Stat 2(166).

Jacoby, W. (1994). Public Attitudes toward Government Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 38(2), 336-361. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2111407

Jacoby, W. (2000). Issue Framing and Public Opinion on Government Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 44(4), 750-767. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2669279

Jacoby, W. (2006). Value Choices and American Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 50(3), 706-723. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2006.00211.x

McDonald, Ian. (2011). Migration and Sorting in the American Electorate: Evidence from the 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study. American Politics Research, 39(3), 512-533. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X10396303

McKee, Seth. (2008). Rural Voters and the Polarization of American Presidential Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics, 41(1), 101-108.

Misra, Tanvi. (2018). Rural and Urban America Have More in Common Than You Think. CityLab. https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/05/rural-and-urban-america-have-more-in-common-than-you-think/560783/?utm_source=citylab-daily&silverid=NDY5NTk2NTQwMTc0S0.

Nelson, T., & Kinder, D. (1996). Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion.The Journal of Politics, 58(4), 1055-1078. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2960149

Pickering, A., & Rockey, J. (2011). Ideology and the Growth of Government. Review of Economics and Statistics, 93, 907-919. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00101

Popkin, Samuel L. (1994). The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

Reagan, Ronald. (1986). “The President’s News Conference.” https://www.reaganfoundation.org/ronald-reagan/reagan-quotes-speeches/news-conference-1/

Rudolph, T., & Evans, J. (2005). Political Trust, Ideology, and Public Support for Government Spending. American Journal of Political Science, 49(3), 660-671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00148.x

Scala, D. J., & Johnson, K. M. (2017). Political Polarization along the Rural-Urban Continuum? The Geography of the Presidential Vote, 2000–2016.The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 672(1), 162–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716217712696

Walsh, K. (2012). Putting Inequality in Its Place: Rural Consciousness and the Power of Perspective. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 517-532. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000305

Published
2020-12-22
Section
Articles