Did the Iraq War Have a Body Bag Effect?

Authors

  • Babak Bahador Media and Communication and Political Science, University of Canterbury
  • Scott Walker Senior Lecturer in Political Science, University of Canterbury

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2012.33.0.247-270

Abstract

Did mounting troop casualties during the Iraq War turn the American public against the conflict? Analyzing public opinion data from over 400 public polls during the first six years of the war, this article attempts to identify whether there was a “body bag effect” in play. We create a multi-variate model that tests a number of potential hypotheses including cumulative and marginal troop casualty as well as death milestone effects. We find that cumulative casualties provide a better explanation for the decline in public support than marginal casualties during the Iraq War. Contrary to the findings from the Korean and Vietnam Wars, this holds true during both periods of escalation and de-escalation.

References

Baum, Matthew A., and Tim J. Groeling. 2010. War Stories: The Causes and Consequences of Public Views of War. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Berinsky, Adam. 2007. Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Support for Military Conflict. Journal of Politics 69:975-997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00602.x

Berinsky, Adam. 2009. In Time of War: Understanding Public Opinion, From World War II to Iraq. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. CNN/USA Today Poll. 2007.

Coker, Christopher. 2001. Humane Warfare. London: Routledge. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203166840

Daalder, Ivo, and Michael E. O'Hanlon. 2000. Winning Ugly: NATO's War to Save Kosovo. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Enders, Walter. 2004. Applied Econometric Time Series, 2nd ed. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

Entman, Robert. 2004. Framing News, Public Opinion, and U.S. Foreign Policy. Chicago:University of Chicago Press.

Entman, Robert. 2000. Declarations of Independence: The Growth of Media Power after the Cold War. In Decisionmaking in a Glass House: Mass Media, Public Opinion, and American and European Foreign Policy in the 21st Century, eds. B. Nacos, Robert Shapiro, and Pierangelo Isernia. Lanahan, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Freedman, Lawrence. 2000. Victims and Victors: Reflections on the Kosovo War. Review of International Studies 26:335-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0260210500003351

Gartner, Scott Sigmund, And Gary M. Segura. 1998. War, Casualties, and Public Opinion. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:278-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042003004

Gelpi, Christopher. 2010. Performing on Cue? The Formation of Public Opinion toward War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 54:88-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002709352845

Gelpi, Christopher, Peter Feaver, and Jason Reifler. 2005. Success Matters: Casualty Sensitivity and the War in Iraq. International Security 30:7-46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/016228805775969573 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/isec.2005.30.3.7

Hallin, Daniel. 1989. The Uncensored War. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hetherington, Marc J., and Michael Nelson. 2003. Anatomy of a Rally Effect: George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism. PS: Political Science and Politics 36:37-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096503001665

Holsti, Ole R. 2002. Public Opinion and Foreign Policy Analysis: Where We Were, Are, and Should Strive to Be. In Millennial Reflections on International Studies, eds. Michael Brecher and Frank P. Harvey. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Jentleson, Bruce. 1992. The Pretty Prudent Public: Post Post-Vietnam American Opinion on the Use of Military Force. International Studies Quarterly 36:49-73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600916

Jentleson, Bruce. 1998. Still Pretty Prudent: Post-Cold War American Public Opinion on the Use of Military Force. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42:395-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002798042004001

Livingston, Steven. 2000. Media Coverage and the War: An Empirical Assessment. Pp. 360-384 in Kosovo and the Challenge of Humanitarian Intervention: Selective Indignation, Collective Action, and International Citizenship, eds. Albrecht Schnabel and Ramesh Thakur. Tokyo, New York, Paris: United Nations University Press.

Mueller, John. 1973. War, Presidents and Public Opinion. New York: John Wiley.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 1998. Public Appetite for Government Misjudged: Washington Leaders Wary of Public Opinion.

Ray, James Lee. 2002. Explaining Interstate Conflict and War: What Should Be Controlled For? Peace Science Society Meeting, Tucson, AZ, Nov. 1-3.

Secretary, White House Office of the Press. 1999. Address by the President to the Nation, March 24.

von Clausewitz, Carl. 1993. On War, eds. M. Howard and P. Paret. London: Everyman.

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691

Zaller, John R., and Dennis Chiu. 2000. Government's Little Helper: U.S. Press Coverage of Foreign Policy Crises, 1948-1999. In Decisionmaking in a Glass House: Mass Media, Public Opinion, and American and European Public Policy in the 21st Century, edited by B. Nacos, R. Shapiro, and P. Isernia. Lanahan, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.

Downloads

Published

2013-01-01

Issue

Vol. 33: Winter 2012-2013

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.