Information, Misinformation, and Political Participation

Authors

  • Kenneth Michael White
  • Michael Binder
  • Richard Ledet
  • C. Richard Hofstetter

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2006.27.0.71-90

Abstract

This research addresses the extent to which political participation is a function of misinformation. A large body of work links information with participation, but relatively few authors have addressed the relationship between misinformation and participation. We use data from a 1997 random-digit-dial survey of 810 adults in San Diego to test the hypothesis that misinformation (confident beliefs in false facts) is associated with political participation even after controlling for other explanations, including information. We find that while both misinformation and information tend to increase participation levels, their specific impacts vary. This research ends a period of speculation by presenting empirical evidence of misinformed participation for the first time in the literature.

References

Abeles, Paul, and John Morton. 1999. Avoiding Misinformation: Reinstating Target Modality. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 52:581-592. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713755830

Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition, 2nd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226924571.001.0001

Baker, Brent. 1994. How to Identify, Expose and Correct Liberal Media Bias. Alexandria: Media Research Center.

Barber, Benjamin R. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Bartels, Larry M. 1996. Uninformed Votes: Information Effects in Presidential Elections. American Journal of Political Science 40:194-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111700

Brady, Henry E., Sidney Verba, and Kay Lehman Schlozman. 1995. Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Political Participation. American Political Science Review 89: 271-294. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082425

Center for American Women in Politics. 2002. Fact Sheet: Sex Differences in Voter Turnout. Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University.

Converse, Philip E. 1964. The Nature of Belief Systems in Mass Publics. In Ideology and Discontent, ed. David Apter. New York: Free Press.

Conway, Margaret M. 2000. Political Participation in the United States. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1993. Measuring Political Knowledge: Putting First Things First. American Journal of Political Science 37:1179-1206. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111549

Delli Carpini, Michael X., and Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Fiorina, Morris P., Samuel J. Abrams, and Jeremy C. Pope. 2006. Culture Wars? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.

Hofstetter, Richard C., David Barker, James T. Smith, Gina M. Zari, and Thomas A. Ingrassia. 1999. Information, Misinformation, and Political Talk-radio. Political Research Quarterly 52:353-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/449222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200205

Katz, Elihu, and Paul F. Lazarsfeld. 1964. Personal Influence: The Part Played by People in the Flow of Mass Communications. New York: Free Press.

Kruglanski, Arie W., and Tallie Freund. 1983. The Freezing and Unfreezing of Lay-Inferences: Effects on Impressional Primacy, Ethnic Stereotyping, and Numerical Anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 19:448-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90022-7

Kuklinski, James H., Paul J. Quirk, Jennifer Jerit, David Schwieder, and Robert F. Rich. 2000. Misinformation and the Currency of Democratic Citizenship. The Journal of Politics 62:790-816. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00033

Kunda, Ziva. 1987. Motivation and Inference: Self-Serving Generation and Evaluation of Evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53:636-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636

Kunda, Ziva. 1990. The Case for Motivated Reasoning. Psychological Bulletin 108:480-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480

Lau, Richard R., and David P. Redlawsk. 1997. Voting Correctly. The American Political Science Review 91:585-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2952076

Lupia, Arthur, and Mathew D. McCubbins. 1998. The Democratic Dilemma: Can Citizens Learn What They Need to Know? New York: Cambridge University Press.

Miller, Dale T., and M. Ross. 1975. Self Serving Biases in Attribution of Causality: Fact or Fiction? Psychological Bulletin 82:213-225. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0076486

Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik. 1976. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Nisbett, Richard E., and Lee Ross. 1980. Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Ortega y Gasset, Jose. 1932. The Revolt of the Masses. New York: Norton.

Ortega y Gasset, Jose. 1958. Man and Crisis. New York: Norton.

Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans. Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001

Palfrey, Thomas R., and Keith T. Poole 1987. The Relationship Between Information, Ideology, and Voting Behavior. American Journal of Political Science 31:511-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111281

Plato. The Republic. Trans. Alan Bloom. 1991. Basic Books. Plato. Euthyphro. In Four Texts on Socrates. Trans. Thomas G. West and Grace Starry West. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

Plato. Symposium. Trans. Seth Benardete. 2001. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Com-munity. New York: Simon and Schuster. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/358916.361990

Putnam, Robert D. 2003. APSA Presidential Address: The Public Role of Political Science. Perspectives on Politics 1:249-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1537592703000185

Pyszczynski, T., and J. Greenberg. 1987. Toward an Integration of Cognitive and Motivational Perspectives on Social Inference: A Biased Hypothesis-Testing Model. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz. New York: Academic Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60417-7

Smith, Eric R.A.N. 1989. The Unchanging American Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Sorrentino, Richard M., and E. Tory Higgins. 1986. Motivation and Cognition: Warming Up to Synergism. In Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, eds. Richard M. Sorrentino and E. Tory Higgins. New York: Guilford Press.

Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, Henry Brady, and Norman H. Nie. 1993. Race Ethnicity and Political Resources: Participation in the United States. British Journal of Political Science 23:453-497. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400006694

Wright, Daniel B., Gail Self, and Chris Justice. 2000. Memory Conformity: Exploring Misinformation Effects When Presented by Another Person. British Journal of Psychology 91:189-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712600161781

Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511818691

Downloads

Published

2006-04-01

Issue

Vol. 27: Spring 2006

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.