Political Conversations in the United States: Who Talks to Whom, Why, and Why Not

Authors

  • Stephen Earl Bennett
  • Bonnie Fisher
  • David Resnick

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1995.16.0.277-298

Abstract

Although normative political theorists have argued that citizens talking with other citizens about public affairs is essential in a democracy, empirically oriented political scientists have tended to ignore political discussions. This paper draws on National Election Studies and General Social Surveys to plumb the extent and breadth of political conversations in the U.S. We also explore who talks about public affairs, with whom they speak, and why some people avoid discussing politics. A logit analysis of pooled National Election Studies from 1984 to 1992 shows that some factors typically thought to affect taking part in politics are not significant predictors of the probability that people will engage in political discussions, but other variables not normally included in participation models do affect talking about politics.

References

Almond, Gabriel A., and Sidney Verba. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400874569

Aristotle. 1988. The Politics, ed. Stephen Everson. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Barnes, Samuel, Max Kaase, et al. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

Bennett, Stephen E. 1986. Apathy in America, 1960-1984. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Transnational Publishers.

Berelson, Bernard R., Paul M. Lazarsfeld, and William N. McPhee. 1954. Voting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Boyd, Richard W. 1981. Decline of U.S. Voter Turnout: Structural Explanations. American Politics Quarterly 9:133-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8100900201

Burt, Ronald S. 1984. Network Items and the General Social Survey. Social Nenwrks 6:293-339. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0378-8733(84)90007-8

Campbell, Angus. 1966. Surge and Decline: A Study of Electoral Change. In Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes, Elections and the Political Order. New York: Wiley.

Cantril, Hadley D., and Mildred Strunk. 1951. Public Opinion 1935-1946. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Conway, M. Margaret. 1991. The Study of Political Participation: Past, Present, and Future. In William J. Crotty, ed., Political Science: Looking to the Future. Volume 3. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

Crigler, Ann N., and Klau Bruhn Jensen. 1991. Discourses on Politics: Talking about Public Issues in the United States and Denmark. In Peter Dahlgren and Colin Sparks, eds., Communication and Citizenship. London: Routledge.

DeMaris, Alfred. 1992. Logit Modeling: Practical Applications. SAGE University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-086. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984836

Denk, Charles E., and Steven J. Finkel. 1992. The Aggregate Impact of Explanatory Variables in Logit and Linear Probability Models. American Journal of Political Science 36:785-804. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111591

Dewey, John. 1927. The Public and Its Problems. New York: Holt.

Dryzek, John S. 1988. The Mismeasureof Political Man. Journal of Politics 50:705-25. Political Conversations in the United States | 297 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131464

Farr, James. 1993. Framing Democratic Discussion. In George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson, eds., Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Gamson, William A. 1992. Talking Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Granovetter, Mark. 1973. The Strength of Weak Ties. American Journal of Sociology 78:1360-80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/225469

Hagle, Timothy M., and Glenn E. Mitchell II. 1992. Goodness-of-Fit Measures for Probit and Logit. American Journal of Political Science 36:762-84. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111590

Hosmer, David W., and Stanley Lemeshow. 1989. Applied Logistic Regression. New York: Wiley.

Huckfeldt, Robert, and John Sprague. 1995. Citizen, Politics, and Social Communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664113

Kenny, Christopher B. 1992. Political Participation and Effects from the Social Environment. American Journal of Political Science 36:259-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111432

_______. 1993a. The Microenvironment of Political Participation. American Politics Quarterly 21:223-38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100204

_______. 1993b. Social Influence and Opinion on Abortion. Social Science Quarterly 74:560-74.

Kim, Jae-On, and Charles W. Mueller. 1978a. Introduction to Factor Analysis: What It Is and How To Do It. SAGE University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-013. Beverly Hills: SAGE. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984652

_______. 1978b. Factor Analysis: Statistical Methods and Practical Issues. SAGE University Paper series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, series no. 07-014. Beverly Hills: SAGE.

Kinder, Donald R., and Don Herzog. 1993. Democratic Discussion. In George E. Marcus and Russell L. Hanson, eds., Reconsidering the Democratic Public. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Knoke, David. 1990. Political Networks: The Structural Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511527548

Lane, Robert E. 1965. Political Life: Why and How People Get Involved in Politics, rev. ed. New York: The Free Press.

Lazarsfeld, Paul, Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet. 1948. The People's Choice, 3rd ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

Luskin, Robert C. 1990. Explaining Political Sophistication. Political Behavior 12:331- 61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00992793

MacKuen, Michael. 1990. Speaking of Politics: Individual Conversational Choice, Public Opinion, and the Prospects of Deliberative Democracy. In John A. Ferejohn and James H. Kuklinski, eds., Information and Democratic Processes. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.

Mansbridge, Jane J. 1983. Beyond Adversary Democracy, rev. ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Milbrath, Lester W. 1965. Political Participation. Chicago: Rand McNally.

Mill, John Stuart. [18611 1958. Considerations on Representative Government, ed. Currin v. Shields. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.

Parry, Geraint, George Moyser, and Neil Day. 1992. Political Participation and Democracy in Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511558726

Resnick, David, and Stephen E. Bennett. 1993. Rethinking Political Participation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 13-15.

Sigelman, Lee, Philip W. Roeder, Malcolm E. Jewell, and Michael A. Baer. 1985. Voting and Non-voting: A Multi-Election Perspective. American Journal of Political Science 29:749-65. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111179

Sniderman, Paul M. 1975. Personality and Democratic Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Verba, Sidney, and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Political Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper & Row.

Walker, Jack L. 1966. A Critique of the Elitist Theory of Democracy. American Political Science Review 60:285-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400127443 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953356

Downloads

Published

1995-11-01

Issue

Vol. 16: Fall 1995

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.