Who Signs? Ballot Petition Signatures as Political Participation

Authors

  • Brian Amos University of Florida, PhD (ABD)
  • Diana Forster Hanover Research Washington, DC
  • Daniel A Smith University of Florida

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2018.36.2.19-37

Abstract

Who signs ballot initiative petitions? Do they fit a particular socio-political and demographic profile of a likely voter, or are they peripheral voters who become engaged in the political process due to the issue at hand? And are some citizens who sign petitions more likely to have valid signatures than others? Scholars have been slow to assess who is likely to become engaged in perhaps one of the most common forms of political participation: signing a ballot petitions. Drawing on an original dataset of individual-level data, we use GIS and logit models to test which citizens were more likely to sign a contoversial local ballot petition, as well as to determine who was likely to sign a valid (or invalid) petition.

Author Biographies

Brian Amos, University of Florida, PhD (ABD)

University of Florida, PhD candidate

Diana Forster, Hanover Research Washington, DC

University of Florida, PhD (2015)

Daniel A Smith, University of Florida

Political Science

Professor

References

Associated Press. 2009. "Florida Conservatives Fight for Repeal of Transgender Restroom Rule." January 10, 2009. Available online at http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,478924,00.html#ixzz1MMLzn0eA.

Boehmke, Frederick J. and R. Michael Alvarez. 2014. "Where the good signatures are: Signature collection and initiative qualification in California," The Social Science Journal, online. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.06.001. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2014.06.001

Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan. 2002. "Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government." British Journal of Political Science 32: 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123402000157

Bowler, Shaun, Todd Donovan, and Caroline Tolbert, eds. 1998. Citizens as Legislators: Direct Democracy in the United States. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Broder, David S. 2000. Democracy Derailed: Initiative Campaigns and the Power of Money. New York, NY: Harvest.

Button, James W., Barbara A. Rienzo and Kenneth D. Wald. 1997. Private Lives, Public Conflicts: Battles Over Gay Rights in American Communities. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Delli Carpini, Michael X. Scott Keeter. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Donovan, Todd and Daniel A Smith. 2008. "Identifying and Preventing Signature Fraud on Ballot Measure Petitions." In Election Fraud: Detecting and Deterring Electoral Manipulation, eds. R. Michael Alvarez, Thad E. Hall, and Susan D. Hyde. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

Donovan, Todd, Caroline Tolbert, and Daniel A. Smith. 2009. "Political Engagement, Mobilization and Direct Democracy." Public Opinion Quarterly 73: 98-118. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfp017

Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Mark Joslyn. 2008. "Understanding Beliefs about the Origins of Homosexuality and Subsequent Support for Gay Rights An Empirical Test of Attribution Theory." Public Opinion Quarterly 72: 291-310. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfn015

Helson, Harry, Robert R. Blake, and Jane Srygley Mouton. 1956. "Petition-Signing as Adjustment to Situational and Personal Factors." Journal of Social Psychology 48: 3-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1958.9919261

Huckfeldt, Robert and John Sprague. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511664113

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Sidney Verba, and Henry E. Brady. 2012. The Unheavenly Chorus: Unequal Political Voice and the Broken Promise of American Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400841912

Loftus, Jeni. 2001. "America's Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998." American Sociological Review 66: 762-782. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088957

Lupia, Arthur. 1994. "Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections." American Political Science Review 88: 63-76. https://doi.org/10.2307/2944882

Magleby, David. 1984. Direct Legislation: Voting on Ballot Propositions in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Magleby, David and Kelly Patterson. 1998. "Consultants and Direct Democracy." PS: Political Science and Politics 31: 160-164. https://doi.org/10.2307/420244 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049096500054196

Matsusaka, John G. 2004. For the Many or the Few: The Initiative, Public Policy, and American Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226510873.001.0001

Nieman, Max, and M. Gottdiener. 1982. "The Relevance of the Qualifying Stage of Initiative Politics: The Case of Petition Signing." Social Science Quarterly 63:582-588.

Parry, Janine A., Daniel A. Smith, and Shayne Henry. 2011. "The Impact of Petition Signing on Voter Turnout." Political Behavior 34: 117-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-011-9161-1

Peterson, Paul E. 1981. City Limits. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922645.001.0001

Rimmerman, Craig A., Kenneth D. Wald and Clyde Wilcox, eds. 2000. The Politics of Gay Rights. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Rosenstone, Steven J. and John Mark Hansen. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America. New York, NY, Macmillan Publishing Company.

Sapiro, Virginia, and Conover, Pamela Johnston. 1997. "The variable gender bias of electoral politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 U.S. Election," British Journal of Political Science 27: 497–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123497000240

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Burns, Nancy, and Verba, Sidney. 1994. "Gender and the pathways to participation: the role of resources," Journal of Politics 56: 963–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/2132069

Smith, Daniel A. 2012. "Direct Democracy—Regulating the 'Will of the People,'" in Matthew Streb, ed., Law and Election Politics: The Rules of the Game, 2nd edition. New York: Routledge.

Smith, Daniel A. 1998. Tax Crusaders and the Politics of Direct Democracy. NY: Routledge.

Smith, Daniel A., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 2004. Educated by Initiative: The Effects of Direct Democracy on Citizens and Political Organizations in the American States. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.11467

Stein, Robert M., Keith E. Hamm, Patricia K. Freeman. 1983. "An Analysis of Support for Tax Limitation Referenda." Public Choice 40: 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118520

Verba, Sidney, Burns, Nancy, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1997. "Knowing and caring about politics: gender and political engagement," Journal of Politics 59: 1051–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/2998592

Verba, Sidney and Norman H. Nie. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.

Verba, Sidney, Kay Lehman Schlozman, and Henry E. Brady. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA, Harvard University Press.

Wolfinger, Raymond E. and Stephen J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT, Yale University Press.

Downloads

Published

2018-06-03

Issue

Section

Articles