Exploring Responsiveness in the U.S. House of Representatives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2018.36.2.58-85Abstract
Legislators are elected to be the voice of their constituents in government. Implicit in this electoral connection is the responsiveness of legislators to the preferences of constituents. Many past approaches only examine successful legislative behavior blessed by the majority party, not all legislative behavior, thereby limiting inference generalizability. I seek to overcome this limitation by considering bill sponsorship as an outlet in which all members are free to engage. Testing expectations on bill sponsorship in the 109th and 110th Congresses, I find that legislators are responsive, though only on “safely-owned” issues. I compare these findings to roll call voting on the same issues in the same Congresses and find a different pattern, suggesting legislators leverage bill sponsorship differently than roll call voting as they signal legislative priorities.References
Aaron, Henry J., and Kevin Lucida. "Health Insurance Exchanges Fulfill Both Liberal and Conservative Goals." Brookings Institution, October 1, 2013. https://www. brookings.edu/opinions/health-insurance-exchanges-fulfill-both-liberal-andconservative-goals/ (accessed September 29, 2016).
Abramowitz, Alan I., and Kyle L. Saunders. 2008. "Is Polarization a Myth?" Journal of Politics, 70(2): 542-555. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080493
Achen, Christopher H. 1978. "Measuring Representation." American Journal of Political Science, 22(3): 475-510. https://doi.org/10.2307/2110458
Adler, E. Scott, and John S. Lapinski. 1997. "Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach." American Journal of Political Science, 41(3): 895-918. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111679
Adler, E. Scott, and John D. Wilkerson. 2012. Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139150842
Alexander, Dan, Christopher R. Berry, and William G. Howell. 2016. "Distributive Politics and Legislator Ideology." Journal of Politics, 78(1): 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1086/683643
Bafumi, Joseph, and Michael C. Herron. 2010. "Leapfrog Representation and Extremism: A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress." American Political Science Review, 104(3): 519-542. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055410000316
Bafumi, Joseph, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2009. "A New Partisan Voter." Journal of Politics, 71(1): 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608090014
Barnello, Michelle A., and Kathleen A. Bratton. 2007. "Bridging the Gender Gap in Bill Sponsorship." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 32(3): 449-474. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298007781699645
Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones. 1993. Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bianco, William T. 1994. Trust: Representatives and Constituents. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14057
Bishin, Benjamin G. 2009. Tyranny of the Minority: The Subconstituency Politics Theory of Representation. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Burnstein, Paul, Shawn Bauldry, and Paul Froese. 2005. "Bill Sponsorship and Congressional Support for Policy Proposals, from Introduction to Enactment or Disappearance." Political Research Quarterly, 58(2): 295-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800209 https://doi.org/10.2307/3595630
Cameron, Charles, David Epstein, and Sharyn O'Halloran. 1996. "Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress?" American Political Science Review, 90(4): 794-812. https://doi.org/10.2307/2945843
Carey, John M. 2007. "Competing Principals, Political Institutions, and Party Unity in Legislative Voting." American Journal of Political Science, 51(1): 92-107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00239.x
Cayton, Adam F. 2016. "Consistency versus Responsiveness: Do Members of Congress Change Positions on Specific Issues in Response to Their Districts?" Political Research Quarterly, (September 2016): 1-16.
Clinton, Joshua D. 2006. "Representation in Congress: Constituents and Roll Calls in the 106th House." Journal of Politics, 68(2): 397-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00415.x
Cox, Gary and Mathew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791123
Davis, Darren W., and Brian D. Silver. 2004. "Civil Liberties vs. Security: Public Opinion in the Context of the Terrorist Attacks on America." American Journal of Political Science, 48(1): 28-46. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0092-5853.2004.00054.x
Egan, Patrick J. 2013. Partisan Priorities: How Issue Ownership Drives and Distorts American Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107337138
Erikson, Robert S., Michael B. Mackuen, and James A. Stimson. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps. 1977. "The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 2(3): 233-254. https://doi.org/10.2307/439340
Finocchiaro, Charles J., David W. Rohde. 2008. "War for the floor: Partisan theory and agenda control in the U.S. House of Representatives." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 33(1): 35-61. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298008783743273
Fowler, Anthony, and Andrew B. Hall. 2012. "Conservative Vote Probabilities: An Easier Method for the Analysis of Roll Call Data." Unpublished manuscript.
Fowler, Anthony, and Andrew B. Hall. 2016. "The Elusive Quest for Convergence." Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 11:131-149. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00015082
Gerber, Elisabeth R. 1996. "Legislative Response to the Threat of Popular Initiatives." American Journal of Political Science, 40(1): 99-128. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111696
Gilens, Martin. 2005. "Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness." Public Opinion Quarterly, 69(5): 778-796. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfi058
Griffin, John D., and Patrick Flavin. 2011. "How Citizens and Their Legislators Prioritize Spheres of Representation." Political Research Quarterly, 64(3): 520-533. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912910373552
Grimmer, Justin. 2013a. Representational Style in Congress: What Legislators Say and Why It Matters. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139207782
Grimmer, Justin. 2013b. "Appropriators not Position Takers: The Distorting Effects of Electoral Incentives on Congressional Representation." American Journal of Political Science, 57(3): 624-642. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12000
Grose, Christian R., Neil Malhotra, and Robert Parks Van Houweling. 2015. "Explaining Explanations: How Legislators Explain their Policy Positions and How Citizens React." American Journal of Political Science, 59(3): 724-743. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12164
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2013. "Multidimensional Responsiveness: The Determinants of Legislators' Representational Priorities." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38(2): 155-184. https://doi.org/10.1111/lsq.12009
Harden, Jeffrey J. 2016. Multidimensional Democracy: A Supply and Demand Theory of Representation in American Legislatures. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316442920
Henderson, Michael B. 2015. "How Far Apart Are Democrats and Republicans on School Reform?" Brookings Institution, Brown Center Chalkboard.
Henderson, Michael B., Paul E. Peterson, and Martin R. West. 2014. "Program on Education Policy and Governance: Survey 2014." Education Next, http:// educationnext.org/files/2014ednextpoll.pdf (accessed September 29, 2016).
Hetherington, Marc J., and Thomas J. Rudolph. 2015. Why Washington Won't Work: Polarization, Political Trust, and the Governing Crisis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226299358.001.0001
Jones, Jeffrey M. "Democrats More Liberal on Social Issues Than Economic Ones." Gallup, May 20, 2016. http://www.gallup.com/poll/191741/democrats-liberal-social-issues-economicones.aspx (accessed September 29, 2016).
Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Michael Udell. 1998. "Twenty Five Years after Kramer: An Assessment of Economic Retrospective Voting based upon Improved Estimates of Income and Unemployment." Economics & Politics, 10(3):219-248. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0343.00045
Kramer, Gerald H. 1971. "Short-term Fluctuations in U.S. Voting Behavior, 1896?1964." American Political Science Review, 65(1): 131-143. https://doi.org/10.2307/1955049
Lax, Jeffrey, and Justin Phillips. 2009a. "Gay Rights in the States: Public Opinion and Policy Responsiveness." American Political Science Review, 103 (3): 367-86. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055409990050
Lax, Jeffrey, and Justin Phillips. 2009b. "How Should We Estimate Public Opinion in the States?" American Journal of Political Science, 53(1): 107-121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00360.x
Lax, Jeffrey, and Justin Phillips. 2012. "The Democratic Deficit in the States." American Journal of Political Science, 56(1): 148-166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00537.x
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226473673.001.0001
Levendusky, Matthew. 2010. "Clearer Cues, More Consistent Voters: A Benefit of Elite Polarization." Political Behavior, 32(1): 111-131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-009-9094-0
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Mary Stegmaier. 2000. "Economic Determinants of Electoral Outcomes." Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1): 183-219. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.183
McCarthy, Justin. "Americans Split on Defense Spending." Gallup, February 20, 2015. http://www.gallup.com/poll/181628/americans-split-defense-spending.aspx (accessed September 29, 2016).
Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. "Constituency Influence in Congress." American Political Science Review, 57(1): 45-56. https://doi.org/10.2307/1952717
Newport, Frank. 2013. "Democrats, Republicans See Many U.S. Industries Differently." Gallup, August 23, 2013. http://www.gallup.com/poll/164111/democrats-republicans-industriesdifferently.aspx (accessed November 10, 2016).
Page, Benjamin I., and Robert Y. Shapiro. 1992. The Rational Public: Fifty Years of Trends in Americans' Policy Preferences. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226644806.001.0001
Page, Benjamin I., Robert Y. Shapiro, Paul W. Gronke, and Robert M. Rosenberg. 1984. "Constituency, Party, and Representation in Congress." Public Opinion Quarterly, 48(4): 741-756. https://doi.org/10.1086/268880
Peress, Michael. 2013. "Candidate Positioning and Responsiveness to Constituent Opinion in the U.S. House of Representatives." Public Choice, 156(1): 77-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11127-012-0032-z
Petrocik, John R. 1996. "Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study." American Journal of Political Science, 40(3): 825-850. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111797
Pew Research Center. "Section 3: Political Polarization and Personal Life." Pew Research Center: U.S. Politics Policy, June 12, 2014. http://www.people-press.org/ 2014/06/12/section-3-political-polarization-and-personal-life/ (accessed September 29, 2016).
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rocca, Michael S., and Stacy B. Gordon. 2010. "The Position-Taking Value of Bill Sponsorship in Congress." Political Research Quarterly, 63(2): 387-397. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908330347
Rocca, Michael S., and Gabriel R. Sanchez. 2008. "The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship in Congress." American Politics Research, 36(1): 130. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07306357
Schiller, Wendy J. 1995. "Senators as Political Entrepreneurs: Using Bill Sponsorship to Shape Legislative Agendas." American Journal of Political Science, 39(1): 186-203. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111763
Shapiro, Robert Y. 2011. "Public Opinion and American Democracy." Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(5): 982-1017. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfr053
Shipan, Charles R. and William R. Lowry. 2001. "Environmental Policy and Party Divergence in Congress." Political Research Quarterly, 54(2): 245-263. https://doi.org/10.2307/449156 https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400201
Squire, Peverill, and Keith E. Hamm. 2005. 101 Chambers: Congress, State Legislatures and the Future of Legislative Studies. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Stimson, James A., Michael B. Mackuen, and Robert S. Erikson. 1995. "Dynamic Representation." American Political Science Review, 89 (3): 543-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/2082973
Tausanovitch, Chris, and Christopher Warshaw. 2013."Measuring Constituent Policy Preferences in Congress, State Legislatures, and Cities."Journal of Politics, 75 (2): 330-342. Volden, Craig, and Alan E. Wiseman. 2014. Legislative Effectiveness in the United States Congress: The Lawmakers. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Whitby, Kenny J. 2002. "Bill Sponsorship and Intraracial Voting among African American Representatives." American Politics Research, 30(1): 93-109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X02030001004
Wilson, Walter Clark. 2010. "Descriptive Representation and Latino Interest Bill Sponsorship in Congress." Social Science Quarterly, 91(4): 1043-1062. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2010.00748.x
Woon, Jonathan. 2008. "Bill Sponsorship in Congress: The Moderating Effect of Agenda Positions on Legislative Proposals." Journal of Politics, 70(1): 201-216. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381607080140
Woon, Jonathan. 2009. "Issue Attention and Legislative Proposals in the US Senate." Legislative Studies Quarterly, 34(1): 29-54. https://doi.org/10.3162/036298009787500367
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
