Visual Access Formed by Architecture and its Influence on Visitors' Spatial Exploration in a Museum

Main Article Content

Rui Li
Hongchun Huang

Abstract

A visitor’s experience in space is one key research topic carried out by researchers from multiple disciplines. Regarding the architecture of a museum, research has shown that it is linked to a visitor’s spatial experience in that space. These spatial experiences are relating to aspects such as a visitor’s memory of location, feeling in the space, and making sense of exhibitions. Following the suggestion that architecture influences a visitor’s spatial experiences, we introduce a study addressing the accessibility of one’s vision, named visual access, formed by the architecture and its association with visitor’s exploration pattern. Additional approaches including observation and interviews were carried out to address this question. Results show that direct visual access has a higher influence than physical distance in a visitor’s decision for initial exploration of a museum. In addition, these results are also used to address the pattern of exploration taken by visitors. 

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Allen, G.L. (1999). Spatial abilities, cognitive maps, and wayfinding: Bases for individual differences in spatial cognition and behavior. In Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping And Other Spatial Processes, edited by R.G. Golledge, 46-80. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Bafna, S. (2003). Space syntax: A brief introduction to its logic and analytical techniques. Environment and Behavior 35(1), 17-29.

Benedikt, M.L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design 6(1), 47-65.

Evans, G.W., Skorpanich, M.A., Gärling, T., Bryant, K.J. and Bresolin, B. (1984). The effects of pathway configuration, landmarks and stress on environmental cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology 4(4), 323-35.

Gärling, T., Lindberg, E. and Mäntylä, T. (1983). Orientation in buildings: Effects of familiarity, visual access, and orientation aids. Journal of Applied Psychology 68(1), 177.

Hölscher, C., Büchner, S.J., Meilinger, T. and Strube, G. (2009). Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multi-building ensemble: The effects of spatial structure, task requirements, and metric information. Journal of Environmental Psychology 29(2), 208-19.

Krukar, J. (2014). Walk, Look, Remember: The influence of the gallery’s spatial layout on human memory for an art exhibition. Behavioral Sciences 4(3),181-201.

Lynch, K. (1960). The Image of a City. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Penn, A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition: or why the axial line? Environment and Behavior 35(1), 30-65.

Schorch, P. (2013). The experience of a museum space. Museum Management and Curatorship 28(2),193-208.

Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D. and Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and design 28(1), 103-21.

Tzortzi, K. (2017). Museum architectures for embodied experience. Museum Management and Curatorship 32(5), 491-508.

Wiener, J.M., and Franz, G. (2005). Isovists as a means to predict spatial experience and behavior. In: Spatial Cognition IV: Reasoning, Action, Interaction, edited by C. Freska, M. Knauff, B. Krieg-Brückner, B. Nebel, and T. Barkowsky. Berlin: Springer.