Main Article Content
Despite increased attention on social justice in higher education, underrepresented students often experience the classroom as unwelcoming and even hostile. Although theoretical and pedagogical research exists, what appears to be lacking are examples of concrete social justice pedagogy strategies that can be implemented in the classroom setting. This article describes the Social Justice Syllabus Design Tool (SJSDT) created to facilitate a greater emphasis on social justice in courses. Using an integrative framework and highlighting the focus areas of relationship, community, and process, the SJSDT offers a systematic approach to course re-design by which instructors can assess their classroom environment and course content. A syllabus that signals belongingness, growth mindset, communal goals, clear and positive expectations, and success-orientation assists in setting a welcoming tone that leads to greater student achievement and engagement. Such a syllabus may also help reduce the potential for triggering stereotype threat or other forms of alienation that affect student success among women and students of color in STEM programs. Feedback received from faculty who utilized the tool to revise their course syllabi are discussed, in addition to limitations and recommendations for future practice.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
JCSCORE (ISSN 2642-2387) provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge. All content in JCSCORE is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.
Unless otherwise noted, works published in JCSCORE are distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Share-Alike License (CC BY-NC-SA). By granting a CC BY-NC-SA license in their work, authors retain copyright ownership of the work, but they give explicit permission for others to download, reuse, reprint, modify, distribute, and/or copy the work, as long as the original source and author(s) are properly cited (i.e. a complete bibliographic citation and link to the JCSCORE website), re-use of the work is not for commercial purposes, and the re-used work is shared with the same license. No permission is required from the author(s) or the publishers for such use. According to the terms of the CC BY-NC-SA license, any reuse or redistribution must indicate the original CC-BY-NC-SA license terms of the work.
Exceptions to the application of the CC BY-NC-SA license may be granted at the author(s)’ discretion if reasonable extenuating circumstances exist. Such exceptions must be granted in writing. For coordinating use permission you may either contact the author directly or email firstname.lastname@example.org.
Afros, E., & Schryer, C. F. (2009). The genre of syllabus in higher education. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8(3), 224–233.
Allen, J. M., Muragishi, G. A., Smith, J. L., Thoman, D. B., & Brown, E. R. (2015). To grab and to hold: Cultivating communal goals to overcome cultural and structural barriers in first generation college students’ science interest. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 1(4), 331–341.
Aronson, J., Fried, C. B., & Good, C. (2002). Reducing the effects of stereotype threat on African American college students by shaping theories of intelligence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(2), 113–125.
Baecker, D. L. (1998). Uncovering the rhetoric of the syllabus: The case of the mission “I.” College Teaching, 46(2), 58–62.
Bawarshi, A. S. (2003). Genre and the Invention of the Writer: Reconsidering the Place of Invention in Composition. Logan, Utah: Utah State University Press.
Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263.
Boser, U., Wilhelm, M., & Hanna, R. (2014). The Power of the Pygmalion Effect. Retrieved from Center for American Progress website: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED564606.pdf
Brooks, R., & Goldstein, S. (2008). The mindset of teachers capable of fostering resilience in students. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 23(1), 114–126.
Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn’t no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126.
Clark, I., & Mitchell, Jr., D. (2019). Exploring the relationship between campus climate and minority stress in African American college students. Journal Committed to Social Change on Race and Ethnicity, 4(1), 66–95.
Cohen, G. L., Garcia, J., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Apfel, N., & Brzustoski, P. (2009). Recursive processes in self-affirmation: Intervening to close the minority achievement gap. Science, 324(5925), 400–403.
Convertino, C. (2016). Beyond Ethnic Tidbits: Toward a Critical and Dialogical Model in Multicultural Social Justice Teacher Preparation. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 18(2), 125–142.
Covington, M., Chavis, T., & Perry, A. (2017). A scholar-practitioner perspective to promoting minority success in STEM. Journal for Multicultural Education; Bingley, 11(2), 149–159.
Darder, A. (2015). Imagining justice: Politics, pedagogy, and dissent. In A. J. Jolivette (Ed.), Research Justice: Methodologies for Social Change (pp. 13–26). Bristol, Unitd Kingdom; Policy Press.
Dweck, C. S. (1999). Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation, Personality, and Development (1st ed.). New York: Psychology Press.
Dweck, C. S. (2008). Mindsets and math/science achievement. New York, NY: Carnegie Corporation of New York-Institute for Advanced Study Commission on Mathematics and Science Education. Retreived from: https://www.growthmindsetmaths.com/uploads/2/3/7/7/23776169/mindset_and_math_science_achievement_-_nov_2013.pdf
Edwards, D. B. (2010). Critical pedagogy and democratic education: Possibilities for cross-pollination. The Urban Review, 42(3), 221–242.
Espinosa, L. (2011). Pipelines and pathways: Women of color in undergraduate STEM majors and the college experiences that contribute to persistence. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 209–241.
Franklin, J. D. (2019). Coping with racial battle fatigue: Differences and similarities for African American and Mexican American college students. Race Ethnicity and Education, 22(5), 589–609.
Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the Oppressed: 50th Anniversary Edition (4th ed.). New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Harnish, R., & Bridges, K. (2011). Effect of syllabus tone: Students’ perceptions of instructor and course. Social Psychology of Education, 14(3), 319–330.
Harris, F., & Wood, J. L. (2013). Student success for men of color in community colleges: A review of published literature and research, 1998–2012. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 6(3), 174–185.
Hazari, Z., Sadler, P. M., & Sonnert, G. (2013). The science identity of college students: Exploring the intersection of gender, race, and ethnicity. Journal of College Science Teaching, 42(5), 82–91.
Hurtado, S., Alvarado, A. R., & Guillermo-Wann, C. (2015). Creating inclusive environments: The mediating effect of faculty and staff validation on the relationship between discrimination/bias to student’s sense of belonging. Journal Committed to Social Change on Race and Ethnicity, 1(1), 59–81.
Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175–179.
Johnson, A. C. (2007). Unintended consequences: How science professors discourage women of color. Science Education, 91(5), 805–821.
Johnson, D. R. (2012). Campus racial climate perceptions and overall sense of belonging among racially diverse women in STEM majors. Journal of College Student Development; Baltimore, 53(2), 336–346.
King, B. T., & Ford, T. E. (2003). African-American student perceptions of predominately White campuses: The importance of institutional characteristics relating to racial climate. Journal of Applied Sociology, os-20(2), 65–76.
Lalayants, M. (2012). Overcoming graduate students’ negative perceptions of statistics. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 32(4), 356–375.
Leonard, J., & Moore, C. M. (2014). Learning to enact social justice pedagogy in mathematics classrooms. Action in Teacher Education (Association of Teacher Educators), 36(1), 76–95.
Lundberg, C. A., & Schreiner, L. A. (2004). Quality and frequency of faculty-student interaction as predictors of learning: An analysis by student race/ethnicity. Journal of College Student Development, 45(5), 549–565.
McArthur, J. (2010). Achieving social justice within and through higher education: The challenge for critical pedagogy. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(5), 493–504.
McWilliams, S. (2015). The democratic syllabus. PS: Political Science & Politics, 48(1), 167–170.
National Science Foundation. (2018). Higher education in science and engineering. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report
Palmer, M. S., Wheeler, L. B., & Aneece, I. (2016). Does the document matter? The evolving role of syllabi in higher education. Change, 48(4), 36–47.
Parson, L. (2016). Are STEM syllabi gendered? A feminist critical discourse analysis. The Qualitative Report; Fort Lauderdale, 21(1), 102–116.
Rankin, S. R., & Reason, R. D. (2005). Differing perceptions: How students of color and White students perceive campus climate for underrepresented groups. Journal of College Student Development; Baltimore, 46(1), 43–61.
Saucerman, J., & Vasquez, K. (2014). Psychological barriers to STEM participation for women over the course of development. Adultspan Journal, 13(1), 46–64.
Smith, J. L., Cech, E., Metz, A., Huntoon, M., & Moyer, C. (2014). Giving back or giving up: Native American student experiences in science and engineering. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 20(3), 413–429.
Smith, T., Brumskill, R., Johnson, A., & Zimmer, T. (2018). The impact of teacher language on students’ mindsets and statistics performance. Social Psychology of Education, 21(4), 775–786.
Solorzano, D., Ceja, M., & Yosso, T. (2000). Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education, 69(1/2), 60-73.
Spitzer, B., & Aronson, J. (2015). Minding and mending the gap: Social psychological interventions to reduce educational disparities. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(1), 1–18.
Steele, C. M. (2011). Whistling Vivaldi: How stereotypes affect us and what we can do. New York; W. W. Norton & Company.
Stephens, N. M., Townsend, S. S. M., Markus, H. R., & Phillips, L. T. (2012). A cultural mismatch: Independent cultural norms produce greater increases in cortisol and more negative emotions among first-generation college students. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(6), 1389–1393.
Stieha, V. (2010). Expectations and experiences: The voice of a first‐generation first‐year college student and the question of student persistence. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 23(2), 237–249.
Strayhorn, T. L., Long, L. L., Kitchen, J. A., Williams, M. S., & Stenz, M. E. (2013). Academic and social barriers to Black and Latino male collegians’ success in engineering and related STEM fields. Presented at the 120th ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Atlanta, GA.
Sulik, G., & Keys, J. (2014). “Many students really do not yet know how to behave!”: The syllabus as a tool for socialization. Teaching Sociology, 42(2), 151–160.
Thompson, B. (2007). The syllabus as a communication document: Constructing and presenting the syllabus. Communication Education, 56(1), 54–71.
Wasley, P. (2008). The syllabus becomes a repository of legalese. Chronicle of Higher Education, 54(27), A1–A10.
Williams, M. M., & George-Jackson, C. E. (2014). Using and doing science: Gender, self-efficacy, and science identity of undergraduate students in STEM. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, 20(2), 99–126.