Fact vs. Fiction: An exploratory study of graduation rates of Division I student-athlete “special admits” within a single conference
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2020.1.8.55-81Keywords:
Academic reform, Division I, higher education, intercollegiate athletics, special admits, social cognitive theoryAbstract
Currently, the NCAA does not track the academic outcomes of student-athlete special admits. The purpose of this exploratory study was to gain an understanding of educational outcomes for Division I specially admitted student-athletes. Findings showed the special admit population had the same six-year graduation rate as the overall FCS student body cohort (55%). Only a small percentage (4.5%) of special admits were dismissed for academic reasons. Further study is suggested regarding the demographics and incoming academic characteristics of this population in order to pave the way for academic best practices for this severely understudied group of students within higher education.
References
Alesia, M. (2008, September 7). “Special” treatment for athletes. http://www.indystar.com/apps/pbcs.d11/article?AID=/20080907/SP
Association for the Study of Higher Education (ASHE). (2013). Challenges to Latino student success. ASHE Higher Education Report, 39(1), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/aehe.20007
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 1-26.
Bensimon, E. M. (2015). Forward. In E. Comeaux (Ed.), Making the connection: Data-informed practices in academic support centers for college athletes (p. vii-x). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Boyatzis, R. E. (1998). Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage.
Browning, A. (2015). Bridging the gap: Academic support for entering special-admit college athletes. In E. Comeaux (Ed.), Making the connection: Data-informed practices in academic support centers for college athletes (pp. 109-123). Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Coalition on Intercollegiate Athletics (2005). Academic integrity in intercollegiate athletics: Principles, rules, and best practices. http://www.thecoia.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Academic-Integrity-in-Intercollegiate-Athletics-2005.pdf
Comeaux, E. (Ed.). (2015). Making the connection: Data-informed practices in academic support centers for college athletes. Information Age Publishing, Inc.
Engle, J., & Tinto, V. (2008). Moving beyond access: College success for low-income, first-generation students. Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED504448.pdf
Falcon, L. (2015). Breaking down barriers: First-generation college students and college success. Innovation Showcase, 10(6).
Ferris, E., Finster, M., & McDonald, D. (2004). Academic fit of student-athletes: An analysis of NCAA division I-A graduation rates. Research in Higher Education, 45(6), 555–575.
Francesconi, M., Aina, C., & Cappellari, L. (2011). Student performance may not improve when universities are choosier. Evaluation and Research in Education, 24(4), 231-242. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 09500790.2011.623772
Gurney, G. S., Tan, D. L., & Winters, C. A. (2010). Specially admitted student-athletes: Their academic performance, persistence, and graduation from an NCAA Football Bowl Subdivision university. International Journal of Sport Management, 11(3), 477-491.
Hanton, S., & Jones, G. (1999). The effects of a multimodal intervention program on performers: II. Training the butterflies to fly in formation. The Sport Psychologist, 13(1), 22-41.
Hosick, M. B., & Sproull, N. (2012). NCAA: Eligibility and success. Journal of College Admission, 217, 31-33.
Ingram (2021). Is there such a thing as too low? An exploratory study of incoming academic characteristics of division I student-athlete “special admits” in relation to six-year graduation rates. [Unpublished manuscript]. University of Tennessee, Knoxville.
Ingram, A. M., & Huffman, L. T. (2017). To admit or not to admit? An exploratory study of graduation rates of “special-admit” student-athletes within the “Power 5” conferences. Journal for the Study of Sports and Athletes in Education, 11(3), 193-215. https://doi.org/10.1080/19357397.2017.1346749
Johnson, J. L. (2000-2001). Learning communities and special efforts in the retention of university students: What works, what doesn’t, and is the return worth the investment? Journal of College Student Retention, 2(3), 219-238.
Knobler, M. (2008, December 30). AJC investigation: Many athletes lag far behind on SAT scores. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. https://www.al.com/solomon/2008/12/admission_qualifications.html
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed.) Sage.
National Collegiate Athletic Association. (2020–2021). NCAA division I manual. Indianapolis: NCAA.
NCAA Research Staff. (2015a). Trends in graduation success rates and federal graduation rates at NCAA division I institutions. National Collegiate Athletic Association. http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&ved=0ahUKwiBjemZtcvLAhXI2SYKHa1aDXIQFggcMAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fweb1.ncaa.org%2Fapp_data%2FGSR%2Fnablus15%2FGSR_Fed_Trends.pdf&usg=AFQjCNGZ9azeVI5IHYI0VD9uBY4oBFhelA
NCAA Research Staff. (2015b). How are NCAA graduation rates calculated? National Collegiate Athletic Association. https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=how+are+the+NCAA+graduation+rates+calcul ated+2015
NCAA Research Staff. (2019). Research on student-athlete transfers. National Collegiate Athletic Association. http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research-student-athlete-transfers
NCAA Research Staff. (2020). Division I academic progress rate (APR). National Collegiate Athletic Association. http://www.ncaa.org/about/resources/research/division-i-academic-progress-rate-apr
Robenolt, P. J. (2012). What’s so special about intercollegiate athletic special admits? Implications for academic support programming [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Washington.
Sack, A. L. (1987). College sport and the student-athlete. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 11(1-2), 31–48.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. In B. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 83-110). Springer.
Sparkman, L., Maulding, W., & Roberts, J. (2012). Non-cognitive predictors of student success in college. College Student Journal, 46(3), 642-652.
Stephens, N. M., Hamedani, M. G., & Destin, M. (2014). Closing the social-class achievement gap: A difference-education intervention improves first-generation students’ academic performance and all students’ college transition. Psychological Science, 25(4), 943-953.
Sullivan, P., & Nielsen, D. (2013). “Ability to benefit”: Making forward-looking decisions about our most underprepared students. College English, 75(3), 319-343.
Tinto, V. (1993). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Alexandra Ingram
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
