“In the Arena”: Reflections on Critical Public Engagements on College Sport
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2376-5267.2024.2.2.163-192Keywords:
Public scholarship, autoethnography, alt-Right, college sports, ESPN, harassmentAbstract
In this paper, we reflect on the challenges, opportunities, motives, imperatives, and strategies of engagement associated with public scholarship about college athletics. Public scholarship has become a trendy topic across the academy as universities increasingly push academic workers to boost institutional brands suffering from chronic underfunding through highly visible engagement in the public sphere. We argue that although public scholarship is a vital part of academic work, principal imperatives driving this form of labor should be political/ethical rather than promotional. It is therefore not enough for academic workers to simply generate data for academic audiences, as without public dissemination, the impact is inherently limited and exclusionary. While public engagement is a necessary and important part of our work, it is fraught with the contradictions inherent to the critique of the same institutions that demand that engagement in the first place, as well as the associated collateral intellectual and personal damage that comes from wading into public debate. Through an autoethnographical account of our personal experiences, as scholars intervening in public discourse around the rights of campus athletic workers and our own encounter with ESPN college basketball personality and former college coach Dan Dakich, we will trace some institutional and personal strategies for educators to create protective measures, build community, and mobilize solidarity against real or perceived harassment. Such tactics aim to help scholars produce public work that genuinely contributes to societal conversations, challenges prevailing misconceptions, and centers the voices of minoritized, abused, and exploited athletes above all.
References
Alexander, B.K. (2016). Critical autoethnography as intersectional praxis: A performative pedagogical interplay on bleeding borders of identity. In R.M. Boylorn & M.P. Orbe (Eds.), Critical autoethnography: Intersecting cultural identities in everyday life, (pp. 110-122). Routledge. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315431253-16 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315431253-16
Alter, T.R. (2005). Achieving the promise of public scholarship. In S.J. Peters, N.R. Jordan, M. Adamek, & T.R. Alter (Eds.), Engaging campus and community: The practice of public scholarship in the state and land-grant university system, (pp. 461-487). Kettering Foundation. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9202-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-009-9202-5
Anglin, A. (2016). White genocide professor lashes out-not sorry. Daily stormer, December 27, 2016, www.dailystormer.name/white-genocide-professor-lashes-out-not-sorry, cited in Greene, V. S. (2019). “Deplorable” satire: Alt-right memes, white genocide tweets, and redpilling normies. Studies in American Humor, 5(1), 31-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031
Apel, D. (2009). Just joking? Chimps, Obama, and racial stereotype. Journal of Visual Culture, 8(2), 132-142. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/14704129090080020203 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/14704129090080020203
Benbow, D.H. (2021, March 1). Professor at center of Dan Dakich controversy speaks out: ‘He debased and violated me.’ Indy Star. https://www.indystar.com/story/sports/college/2021/03/01/dan-dakich-controversy-professor-says-he-debased-and-violated-me/6876659002/
Beran, D. (2019). It came from something awful: How a toxic troll army accidentally memed Donald Trump into office. All Points Books. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/s42984-021-00030-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s42984-021-00030-5
Berger, J.M. (2016). Nazis vs. ISIS on Twitter: A comparative study of White nationalist and ISIS online social media networks. Center for Cyber & Homeland Security, George Washington University.
Bhattacharyya, G., & Murji, K. (2013). Introduction: Race critical public scholarship. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36(9), 1359-1373. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.791399 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01419870.2013.791399
Bjork-James, S., & Maskovsky, J. (2017). When White nationalism became popular. Anthropology News, 58(3), e86-e91. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/an.455 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/AN.455
Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240507000102
Cobb, J. (2018, August 9). Sarah Jeong and the question of “context.” New Yorker. www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/sarah-jeong-and-the-question-of-context
Cottom, T.M. (2017, July 17). Academic outrage: When the culture wars go digital. Tressiemc. https://tressiemc.com/essays-2/academic-outrage-when-the-culture-wars-go-digital/
Davis, A.Y. (2012). The meaning of freedom: And other difficult dialogues. City Lights Publishers.
Denzin, N. (1989). Interpretive interactionism. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984584
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. (2000). Autoethnography, personal narrative, reflexivity: Researcher as subject. In N.K Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.), (pp. 733-768). Sage.
Goldberg, D.T. (1998). Call and response: Sports, talk radio, and the death of democracy. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 22(2), 212-223. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/019372398022002007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/019372398022002007
Greene, V.S. (2019). “Deplorable” satire: Alt-right memes, White genocide tweets, and redpilling normies. Studies in American Humor, 5(1), 31-69. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5325/studamerhumor.5.1.0031
Hawley, G. (2017). Making sense of the alt-right. Columbia University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/hawl18512
Hayano, D. (1979). Auto-ethnography: Paradigms, problems, and prospects. Human Organization, 38(1), 99-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/humo.38.1.u761n5601t4g318v
Hermansson, P., Lawrence, D., Mulhall, J., & Murdoch, S. (2020). The international alt-right: Fascism for the 21st century? Routledge. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429032486 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429032486
Horrocks, R. (1994). Masculinity in crisis: Myths, fantasies, and realities. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230372801
Jones, S.R., Kim, Y.C., & Skendall, K.C. (2012). (Re-)framing authenticity: Considering multiple social identities using autoethnographic and intersectional approaches. The Journal of Higher Education, 83(5), 698-724. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0029 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2012.0029
Keeley, S. (2021, February 27). Dan Dakich called out for misogynistic comments & doxing following heated Twitter discussion over student-athlete compensation. Awful Announcing. https://awfulannouncing.com/radio/dan-dakich-called-out-for-misogynistic-comments-doxing-following-heated-twitter-discussion-over-student-athlete-compensation.html
Kusz, K., & Hodler, M.R. (2023). “Saturdays are for the boys”: Barstool sports and the cultural politics of White fratriarchy in contemporary America. Sociology of Sport Journal, 40(1), 96-107. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2022-0075 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1123/ssj.2022-0075
MacLean, N. (2017). Democracy in chains: The deep history of the radical right’s stealth plan for America. Penguin. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/15476715-6910453 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/15476715-6910453
Mudde, C. (2019). The far right today. Polity.
Nylund, D. (2004). When in Rome: Heterosexism, homophobia, and sports talk radio. Journal of Sport and Social Issues, 28(2), 136-168. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0193723504264409 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0193723504264409
Parks, C. (2023, June 14). LGBTQ+ Americans have stronger support than ever – and fiercer backlash. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/06/14/lgbtq-rights-state-legislative-attacks/
Pérez, R. (2017). Racism without hatred? Racist humor and the myth of “colorblindness.” Sociological Perspectives, 60(5), 956-974. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0731121417719699 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0731121417719699
Phillips, W. (2016). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. The MIT Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/10288.001.0001
Ray, R., & Gibbons, A. (2021, November) Why are states banning critical race theory? The Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/fixgov/2021/07/02/why-are-states-banning-critical-race-theory/. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/1890129 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/1890129
Ray, V. (2020, October 2). Trump calls critical race theory ‘un-American.’ Let’s review. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/nation/2020/10/02/critical-race-theory-101/
Richardson, L. (2000). Evaluating ethnography. Qualitative inquiry, 6(2), 253-255. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040000600207
Rufo, C. (2022, May 24). Laying siege to the institutions. City Journal. https://www.city-journal.org/article/laying-siege-to-the-institutions
Wallace-Wells, B. (2021, June 18). How a conservative activist invented the conflict over critical race theory. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/news/annals-of-inquiry/how-a-conservative-activist-invented-the-conflict-over-critical-race-theory
Williams, J.J. (2018, August 5). The rise of the promotional intellectual. The Chronicle of Higher Education. https://www.chronicle.com/article/the-rise-of-the-promotional-intellectual/
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Johanna Mellis, Derek Silva, Nathan Kalman-Lamb
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.