Flipping the Narrative: A Unifying Framework for Juvenile Court-based Forensic Social Work Practice
Main Article Content
Abstract
Professional social workers are trained in multiple competencies and occupy various positions within the forensic landscape. Unified by a code of ethics that emphasizes social justice and the protection and empowerment of marginalized populations and a philosophical approach that recognizes the interplay of individual and environmental factors, social work leadership in youth justice policy and practice is vital. This article proposes a unifying framework for macro, mezzo, and micro court-based forensic social work practice in the 21st century that draws from post-modern critical social work theory.
The lifelong negative impacts of court involvement for young people are well documented and contribute to persistent societal inequities. Pre-disposition court practices can mitigate or further harm court-involved youth. “Flipping the Narrative” is a culturally relevant practice framework for evaluating and designing youth court practices that recognize the intersectionality of the identities and experiences of court-involved youth. The proposed framework incorporates the practical implications of Critical Theory, specifically Critical Race Theory, the Theory of African American Offending, and Queer Theory, and relevant practice approaches, such as Social Justice Youth Development and Narrative Therapy, to analyze current youth court practices, propose areas for further evaluation and innovation, and recommend practice enhancements for defense-based forensic social workers. The urgency for innovation in one New England state is illustrated through a case study.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Amemiya, J., Kieta, J., & Monahan, K. C. (2017). Adolescent Offenders’ Qualitative Reflections on Desistance from Crime. Journal of Research on Adolescence (Wiley-Blackwell), 27(4), 765–781. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12313 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jora.12313
Arnett, C. (2018, June 22). Virtual Shackles: Electronic Surveillance and the Adultification of Juvenile Courts. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 108(3). 399. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/jclc/vol108/iss3/1
Blessett, B., & Gaynor, T. S. (2021). Race, Racism and Administrative Callousness: Using Critical Race Theory for a Race-Conscious Public Administration. Public Integrity, 23(5), 455–458. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1967011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10999922.2021.1967011
Burrell, S., & Stacy, R. (2011). Collateral consequences of juvenile delinquency proceedings in California. Pacific Juvenile Defender Center. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/PJDC-CA-Collateral-Consequences-Handbook-2011.pdf
Capizzi, T., & Stucki, D. (2018, May 29). Juvenile Justice Reform Initiatives in the United States [Slides]. World Conference on Justice for Children 2018. https://2018.justicewithchildren.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/ANTHONY-CAPIZZI-PRESENTATION-ROOM-VI-29.05.18.pdf
Coalition for Juvenile Justice, National Network for Youth, & National League of Cities. (2022). Principles for Change: Addressing the intersections of youth legal system involvement and homelessness. In Coalition for Juvenile Justice. https://www.juvjustice.org/sites/default/files/resource-files/Principles%2520for%2520Change%2520%25286%2529-compressed.pdf
Commonwealth v. Magnus M., 461 Mass. 459, 461 (2012) http://masscases.com/cases/sjc/461/461mass459.html
Dale, M., & Trlin, A. (2007). Probation practice as social work -- viewpoints of practitioners in New Zealand. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work Review, 19(2), 4–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550510362563 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0264550510362563
Dawson, B. (2022, March 4). Children’s Defense Fund — Leave No Child Behind®. Children’s Defense Fund. https://www.childrensdefense.org/#the-problem
Eaglin, J. (2021). When Critical Race Theory Enters the Law & Technology Frame. Michigan Journal of Race & Law, 26.0, 151. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36643/mjrl.26.sp.when DOI: https://doi.org/10.36643/mjrl.26.sp.when
Edgerton, M. & Administrative Office of the Juvenile Court. (2010, February 25). Massachusetts Use of Restraints on Juveniles [Memorandum]. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Massachusetts-Use-of-Restraints-on-Juveniles-Memo-2.25.10.pdf
Feld, B. (2019). The Evolution of the Juvenile Court: Race, Politics, and the Criminalizing of Juvenile Justice (Youth, Crime, and Justice, 4) (Reprint ed.). NYU Press. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479856664.001.0001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18574/nyu/9781479856664.001.0001
Gabriel, M. G., Brown, A., León, M., & Outley, C. (2021). Power and Social Control of Youth during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Leisure Sciences, 43(1/2), 240–246. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1774008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01490400.2020.1774008
Ginwright, S., & James, T. (2002). From assets to agents of change: Social justice, organizing, and youth development. New Directions for Youth Development, 96, 27–46. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1002/yd.25 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/yd.25
Ingham, E. (2018). Attitudes towards disability in society viewed through the lens of critical disability theory: An analysis of Me Before You. Counselling Psychology Review, 33(1), 2–12. https://search-ebscohost-com.ezproxy.simmons.edu/login.aspx?direct=true&db=asn&AN=129773925&site=eds-live&scope=site. DOI: http://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2018.33.1.2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.53841/bpscpr.2018.33.1.2
Isom S, Deena A., and Seal, Z. (2019). Disentangling the Roles of Negative Emotions and Racial Identity in the Theory of African American Offending. American Journal of Criminal Justice 44 (2): 277–308. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9453-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-018-9453-7
Juvenile Justice Policy and Data Board. (2022, March). JJPAD 2021 Annual Report. Commonwealth of Massachusetts. https://www.mass.gov/doc/jjpad-2021-annual-report/download
Khadaroo, S. T. (2015, August 14). Momentum builds to stop the automatic shackling of juveniles in court. The Christian Science Monitor. https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Justice/2015/0814/Momentum-builds-to-stop-the-automatic-shackling-of-juveniles-in-court. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12051 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jfcj.12051
Kinscherff, R., Franks, R., Keator, K., & Pecoraro, M. (2019, February). Promoting Positive Outcomes for Justice-Involved Youth: Implications for Policy, Systems and Practice. Judge Baker Children’s Center. https://jbcc.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/jbcc_juvenile_justice_policy_brief_interactive_spread_version.pdf
Lynch, M., Astone, N.M., Collazos, J., Lipman, M. (2018). Arches Transformative Mentoring Program: An Implementation and Impact Evaluation in New York City. The Urban Institute.
Models for Change. (2013). Avoiding and Mitigating the Collateral Consequences of a Juvenile Adjudication. Models for Change: Systems Reform in Juvenile Justice. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Collateral-Consequences-Inno-Brief-2013.pdf
Morgan, A. (2000). What is narrative therapy: An easy-to-read introduction (Gecko 2000) (First Edition). Dulwich Centre Publications.
Naessens, L., & Raeymaeckers, P. (2020). A generalist approach to forensic social work: A qualitative analysis. Journal of Social Work, 20(4), 501–517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319826740 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319826740
National Juvenile Defender Center. (2016). Campaign Against Indiscriminate Juvenile Shackling: Issue Brief. NJDC. https://njdc.info/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/NJDC_CAIJS_Issue-Brief.pdf
Neitz, M. B. (2011). A Unique Bench, A Common Code: Evaluating Judicial Ethics in Juvenile Court. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 62(1), 32–53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2010.01055.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.2010.01055.x
Rubino, L. L., Anderson, V. R., & McKenna, N. C. (2021). Examining the Disconnect in Youth Pathways and Court Responses: How Bias Invades Across Gender, Race/Ethnicity, and Sexual Orientation. Feminist Criminology, 16(4), 480–503. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211003964 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/15570851211003964
Sajac, K., Sheidow, A., & Davis, M. (2013, September). Transition Age Youth with Mental Health Challenges in the Juvenile Justice System. Juvenile Justice Resource Series. National Center for Mental Health and Juvenile Justice (NCMHJJ). https://www.umassmed.edu/contentassets/15113f8a672840fca8b783ca95a800af/taywithmentalhealthchallengesjj.pdf. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/e311052005-001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/e311052005-001
The Mentoring Center- About Us. (2022). The Mentoring Center- Oakland. Retrieved April 20, 2022, from https://mentor.org/about-us/
Tilsen, J. (2021). Queering Your Therapy Practice (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003011477
Unnever, J. D. (2014). A Theory of African American Offending: A Test of Core Propositions. Race and Justice, 4(2), 98–123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368714531296 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2153368714531296
Unnever, J. D., Gabbidon, S. L. (2011). A theory of African American offending: Race, racism, and crime. New York, NY: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203828564