Attitudes Toward the Treatment of Sex Offenders: A SEM Analysis
Main Article Content
Abstract
Evidence suggests that public attitudes toward sex offenders are often complex, which is partly due to the lack of sophisticated measures that capture different dimensions of individual attitudes. This article examined public attitudes toward sex offenders and their specificattitudes toward sex offender treatment using 2 validated attitudinal scales among a group of 316 psychology students at a southern public university. Structural equation modeling (SEM) method wasused to test the relation between the general attitude and treatment specific attitude. Findings indicated an acceptable model fit with thedata (e.g., CFI¼.95, SRMR¼.07, and RMSEA¼.06). Attitudes toward sex offenders and the level of concern for victims are significantly related to individual attitudes toward the treatment of sexoffenders. Females were found to hold less negative attitudes towardsex offenders than males. The implications of the findings in relationto policy and program development are discussed.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Abracen, J., & Looman, J. (2005). Developments in the assessment and treatment of sexual offenders: Looking backward with a view to the future. Journal ofInterpersonal Violence, 20(1), 12-19.Brown, S. (1999). Public attitudes toward the treatment of sex offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 4, 239-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260504268088
Church, W. T., Baldwin, J., Brannen, D. N., & Clements, C. B. (2009). An exploratory study of social work student's attitudes toward mentally ill offenders. Best Practices in Mental Health, 5 (2), 29-39.
Church, W. T., Wakeman, E., Miller, S., Clements, C.B., & Sun, F. (2008). Community attitudes toward sex offenders: The development of a psychometric assessment instrument. Research on Social Work, 18, 251-259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731507310193
Clements, C. B., Brannen, D. N., Kirley, S. M., Gordon, T., & Church, W.T. (2006). The measurement of concern about victims: Empathy, victim advocacy, and the Victim Concern Scale (VCS). Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 283-295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1348/135532505X79573
Fedoroff, J. P., & Moran, B. (1997). Myths and misconceptions about sex offenders. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 6, 263-276.
Ferguson, K., & Ireland, C. A. (2006). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the influence of offence type: A comparison of staff working in a forensic setting and students. British Journal of Forensic Practice , 8 (2), 10-19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/14636646200600009
Griffin, M. P., & West, D. A ̃. (2006). The lowest and the low? Addressing the disparity between community view, public policy, and treatment effectiveness for sex offenders. Law & Psychology Review, 30, 143-170.
Haghighia, B., & Lopez, A. (1998). Gender and perception of prisons and prisoners. Journal of Criminal Justice, 26, 453-464. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2352(98)00023-3
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (2000). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6 (1), 1-55. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
Hogue, T. E. (1993). Attitudes towards prisoners and sexual offenders. Issues in Criminal & Legal Psychology, 19, 23-32.
Johnson, H., Hughes, J. G., & Ireland, J. L. (2007). Attitudes towards sex offenders and the role of empathy, locus of control and training: A comparison between a probationer police and general public sample. The Police Journal, 80, 28-54. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1350/pojo.2007.80.1.28
Lea, S., Auburn, T., & Kibblewhite, K. (1999). Working with sex offenders: The perceptions and experiences of professionals and paraprofessionals. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 43 (1), 103-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X99431010
Lo ̈sel, F., & Schmucker, M. (2006). The effectiveness of treatment for sexual offenders: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1, 117-146. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-004-6466-7
Marshall, W. L., & Barbaree, H. E. (1988). The long-term evaluation of a behavioral treatment program for child molesters. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 26, 499-511. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(88)90146-5
Marshall, W. L., Jones, R., Ward, T., Johnston, P., & Barbaree, H. E. (1991). Treatment outcome with sex offenders. Clinical Psychology Review, 11, 464-485. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(91)90119-F
McCorkle, R. C. (1993). Research note: Punish and rehabilitate? Public attitudes toward six common crimes. Crime & Delinquency, 39, 240-252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128793039002008
Paulhus, D. L. (1998). The Paulhus deception scales: BIDR version 7. Toronto, Canada and Buffalo, NY: Multi-Health Systems.
Purvis, M., Ward, T., & Devilly, G. (2003). Community corrections officers attributions for sexual offending against children. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 11, 101-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J070v11n04_06
Quinn, J., Forsyth, C., & Mullen-Quinn, C. (2004). Societal reaction to sex offenders: A review of the origins and results of the myths surrounding their crimes and treatment amenability. Deviant Behaviors, 25, 215-232. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01639620490431147
Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (2004). A beginner's guide to structural equationmodeling. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410610904
Vallient, P. M., Furac, C. J., & Antonowicz, D. H. (1994). Attitude toward sex offenders by female undergraduate university students enrolled in a psychology program. Sexual Behavior and Personality, 22 (2), 105-110. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.1994.22.2.105
Weekes, J. R., Pelletier, G., & Beaudette, D. (1995). Correctional officers: How do they perceive sex offenders? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39(1), 55-61. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X9503900107
Wnuk, D., Chapman, J. E., & Jeglic, E. L. (2006). Development and refinement of a measure of attitudes toward sex offender treatment. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 43 (3), 35-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J076v43n03_03