Exploring the Potential for Racial and Gender Bias in Violations of Probation Petitions
Main Article Content
Abstract
Juvenile offender data were examined in 1 county of 1 southern U.S. state, to explore whether racial and gender disparities in youth involved in the justice system were a factor in detention decisions for violations of probation. Probation officers were able to makerelatively consistent decisions about detention for violation of probation, despite disproportionate demographic representationin the overall population that they work with. There remains,however, a substantial potential for subjective bias, suggesting that measures to assist probation officers in making such decisions would appear to have potential value in the field.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Agnew, R. (2009). Juvenile delinquency: Causes and control (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford Press.
Church, W., Wharton, T., & Taylor, J. K. (2009). An examination of differential association and social control theory: Family systems and delinquency.Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 7 (1), 3-15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204008324910
Conley, D. J. (1994). Adding color to a black and white picture: Using qualitative data to explain racial disproportionality in the juvenile justice system. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 135-149. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427894031002003
Frazier, C. E., & Bishop, D. M. (1985). The pretrial detention of juveniles and its impact on case dispositions. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, 76, 1132-1152. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1143504
Griffin, P., & Torbet, P. (2002). Desktop guide to good juvenile probation practice. A report by the National Center for Juvenile Justice. Washington, DC: The National Center for Juvenile Justice.
Hodge, J. P., & Greenleaf, R. G. (2005). An exploratory analysis of the detention decision-making process in one county juvenile department. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice, 3 (3), 23-47. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1300/J222v03n03_03
Hoytt, E. H., Schiraldi, V., Smith, B. V., & Ziedenberg, J. (2002). Pathways to juvenile detention reform: Reducing racial disparities in juvenile detention. A projectof the Anne E. Casey Foundation, 4-79. Baltimore, MD: The Annie E. Casey Foundation.
Jones, P., Harris, P., Fader, J., & Grubstein, L. (2001). Identifying chronic juvenile offenders. Justice Quarterly, 18, 479-507. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07418820100094991
Jung, S., & Rawana, E. (1999). Risk and need assessment of juvenile offenders.Criminal Justice and Behavior, 26 (1), 69-89. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0093854899026001004
Kempf-Leonard, K. (2007). Minority youths and juvenile justice: Disproportionate minority contact after nearly 20 years of reform efforts. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 5 (1), 71-87. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204006295159
Krysik, J., & LeCroy, C. (2002). The empirical validation of an instrument to predict risk of recidivism among juvenile offenders. Research on Social Work Practice, 12 (1), 71-81. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/104973150201200106
Leiber, M. J. (2002). Disproportionate minority confinement (DMC) of youth: An analysis of state and federal efforts to address the issue. Crime and Delinquency, 48 (1), 3-45. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001112870204800101
Maloney, D., Romig, D., & Armstrong, T. (1988). Juvenile probation: The balanced approach. National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. Juvenile Textbook Series: National College of Juvenile and Family Law. Reno, NY: The National Council of Juvenile and Family Court Judges. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.1988.tb00623.x
Maupin, J. R., & Bond-Maupin, L. J. (1999). Detention decision-making in a predominantly Hispanic region: Rural and non-rural differences. Juvenile and Family Court Journal, 50 (3), 11-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-6988.1999.tb00001.x
Maschi, T., Violette, N. M., Rosato, N. S., & Ristow, J. (2009). Juvenile justice and social work. In T. Maschi, C. Bradley, & K. Ward (Eds.), Forensic social work: Psychosocial and legal issues in diverse practice settings (pp. 231-255). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2008). The Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Act of 1974. Retrieved March 14, 2008 from http://ojjdp.ncjrs.org/compliance/jjdpchronology.pdf
Petersilia, J. (1997). Probation in the United States. Crime and Justice, 22, 149-200. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/449262
Prior, D. (2009). The 'problem' of anti-social behavior and the policy knowledge base: Analysing the power knowledge relationship. Critical Social Policy, 29 (1), 5-23. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0261018308098392
Putnins, A. (2005). Assessing recidivism risk among young offenders. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 38, 324-339. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1375/acri.38.3.324
Schwalbe, C. S. (2009). Risk assessment stability: A revalidation study of the Arizona risk needs assessment instrument. Research on Social Work Practice, 19 (2), 205-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731508317297
Wordes, M., Bynum, T. S., & Corley, C. J. (1994). Locking youth up: The impact of race on detention decisions. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 31, 149-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427894031002004