Increasing Alternative Sentencing in the Juvenile Justice System Through a Partnership Between Public Defenders and Social Workers
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study evaluated the effectiveness of a partnership between public defender attorneys and the Alternative Sentencing Social Work Field Education Program. An outcome was to increase alternative sentences that match the rehabilitative needs of juveniles in court. Sentencing outcomes of youth receiving the social work program (n = 116) were compared to youth receiving conventional public defender representation (n = 94). A logistical regression analysis found that juveniles represented by attorneys with social workers were nearly three times more likely (odds ratio = 2.72) to receive alternative sentences than those without social workers when controlling for prior record and charge severity.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Ashford, J. B., Macht, M. W., & Mylym, M. (1987). Advocacy by social workers in the public defender's office. Social Work, 32, 199-204. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/32.3.199
Brooks, S. L. (2006). Using therapeutic jurisprudence to build effective relationships with students, clients, and communities. Clinical Law Review, 13, 213-230.
Caravelis, C. (2011). Static and dynamic indicators of minority threat in sentencing outcomes: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 27, 405-425. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-011-9130-1
Curry, T. R., Lee, G., & Rodriguez, S. F. (2004). Does victim gender increase sentence severity? Further explorations of gender dynamics and sentencing outcomes. Crime and Delinquency, 50, 319-343. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128703256265
Demuth, S. (2003). Racial and ethnic differences in pretrial release decisions and outcomes: A comparison of Hispanic, black, and white felony arrestees. Criminology, 41, 873-907. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2003.tb01007.x
Feldman, L., Males, M., & Schiraldi, V. (2001). A tale of two jurisdictions: Youth crime and detention rates in Maryland and the District of Columbia. Retrieved from www.buildingblocksforyouth.org.
Gavazzi, S. M., Yarcheck, C. M., & Lim, J. (2005). Ethnicity, gender, and global risk indicators in the lives of status offenders coming to the attention of the juvenile court. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 49, 696-710. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624X05276467
Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335. (1963). In re Gault. 387 U.S. 1, 87 S.Ct. 1428. (1967).
Harvard University. (2013, May 1). Ash Center for Democratic Governance and Innovation: Top 25 innovations in government. Retrieved from http//www.ash.harvard.edu/Home/News-Events/Press-Releases/Innovations/Top-25-Innovations-in-Government-Announced2/Top-25-Programs
Kendall, J. R., & Hawke, C. (2007). Juvenile status offenses: Treatment and early intervention. Technical Assistance Bulletin, Number 29. American Bar Association Division for Public Education.
Kentucky Unified Juvenile Code. Ky. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 600.020-48-60a (1986, effective July 12, 2012).
Lipsey, M., Chapman, G., & Landenberger, N. (2001). Cognitive-behavioral programs for offenders. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 578, 144-157. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620157800109
Madden, R. G., & Wayne, R. H. (2003). Social work and the law: A therapeutic jurisprudence perspective. Social Work, 48, 338-347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/48.3.338
Mason, C. A., Chapman, D. A., Chang, S., & Simons, J. (2003). Impacting rearrest rates among youth sentenced in adult court: An epidemiological examination of the juvenile sentencing advocacy project. Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychology, 32, 205-214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1207/S15374424JCCP3202_5
McGuire, J. (2000). Can the criminal law ever be therapeutic? Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 18, 413-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-0798(2000)18:4<413::AID-BSL365>3.0.CO;2-H
Mendel, R. A. (2011). No place for kids: The case for reducing juvenile incarceration. Casey Foundation Report. Retrieved from http://www.aecf.org/OurWork/JuvenileJustice/~/media/Pubs/Topics/Juvenile%20Justice/Detention%20Reform/NoPlaceForKids/JDAI_DeepEnd_Embargoed.pdf
Nagin, D. S., Piquero, A. R., Scott, E. S., & Steinberg, L. (2006). Public preferences for rehabilitation versus incarceration of juvenile offenders: Evidence from a contingent valuation survey. Journal of Criminology and Public Policy, 5, 627-652. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2006.00406.x
National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics. Washington, DC: Author. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention. (2012). Juvenile court statistics, 2009.
Petrucci, C. J. (2007). Therapeutic jurisprudence in social work and criminal justice. In A. R. Roberts & D. W. Springer (3rd ed.), Social work in juvenile and criminal justice settings (pp. 287-299). Springfield, IL: Thomas Publisher.
Rodriguez, N. (2005). Restorative justice, communities, and delinquency: Whom do we reintegrate? Criminology & Public Policy, 4 (1), 103-130. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2005.00010.x
Senna, J. J. (1975). Social workers in public defender programs. Social Work, 7, 271-277.
United States Census Bureau. (2008). The black population in the United States, (Slide 18). Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/www/socdemo/race/Black-US.pd
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). New York, NY: Allyn and Bacon.
Ulmer, J. T., & Johnson, B. (2004). Sentencing in context: A multilevel analysis. Criminology, 42, 137-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2004.tb00516.x
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (1990). Therapeutic jurisprudence as a new approach to mental health law policy analysis and research. University of Miami Law Review, 45, 979.
Wexler, D. B., & Winick, B. J. (2003). Putting therapeutic jurisprudence to work. American Bar Association Journal, 89 (5), 54-58.
Yearwood, D. L., & Abdum-Muhaymin, J. (2007). Juvenile structured day programs for suspended and expelled youth: An evaluation of process and impact. Preventing School Failure, 51 (4), 47-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3200/PSFL.51.4.47-61