Neighborhood Defenders Program: An Evaluation of Maryland’s Holistic Representation Program
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article provides insights and lessons learned from the Neighborhood Defenders Program (NDP) established by the Maryland Office of the Public Defender in 2006. The NDP is a holistic representation model that uses interdisciplinary teams of lawyers, social workers, law clerks, support staff, and college interns to provide legal representation while assisting clients with social and economic concerns such as reentry, housing, employment, immigration, mental health, and education. Clients are eligible for social service assistance from the NDP indefinitely, even after their legal case has been resolved. First, the authors provide an overview of holistic criminal defense and a description of the NDP. This is followed by a brief description of evaluation methods and a report of the main findings, which are based on interviews, focus groups, and observations with clients, attorneys, social workers, support staff, and families or guardians of clients. Last, the authors provide concluding thoughts and recommendations based on these findings that may help others who seek to establish or improve existing holistic criminal defense practices. It is the authors’ goal to contribute to dialogue around holistic criminal defense programs to maximize benefits to clients and to avoid or mitigate any harm.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
-
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
-
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
-
NoDerivatives — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
References
Ammar, D., & Downey, T. (2003). Transformative criminal defense practice: Truth, love, and individual rights- The innovative approach of the Georgia Justice Project. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 31, 49-68.
Bader, C. G. (2003). "Forgive me victim for I have sinned": Why repentance and the criminal justice system do not mix-a lesson from Jewish Law. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 31, 69-97.
Belden Russonello & Stuart Research and Communications. (2000, September). The price of justice: money, fairness and the right to counsel: Analysis of focus groups on indigent defense. Washington, D.C.: Open Society Institute and the National Legal Aid and Defender Association. Retrieved from http://www.sado.org/publicdefense/The%20Price%20of%20Justice.pdf
Bronx Defenders Office. (2009). The Center for Holistic Defense selects three partner public defender offices. Retrieved from http://www.bronxdefenders.org/press/center-holistic-defense-selects-three-partner-public-defender-offices
Butters, R. P., & Vaughan-Eden, V. (2011). The ethics of practicing forensic social work. Journal of Forensic Social Work, 1, 61-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1936928X.2011.541202
Clarke, C., & Neuhard, J. (2004). "From day one": Who's in control as problem solving and client-centered sentencing takes center stage? New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 29, 11-56.
Community-Oriented Defender Network. (n.d.). New York: Brennan Center for Justice. Retrieved from http://www.brennancenter.org/content/section/category/community_oriented_defender_network/
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Crutchfield, K. (2010). Promising practices: New center provides training in holistic defense. Washington, DC: National Criminal Justice Association Justice Bulletin.
Di Pasquale, C. (2006, April 21). Maryland's Public Defender Programs Trying Holistic Approach to Criminal Defense. The Daily Record. http:/thedailyrecord.com/2006/04/20/defenders-take-the-offensive-122619/
Hesse-Biber, S. N., & Leary, P. (2006). The practice of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Holland, B. (2006). Holistic advocacy: An important but limited institutional role. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 30, 637-652.
How can Georgia turn lawbreakers into taxpayers? (2010, May 30). The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Retrieved from http://www.ajc.com/news/how-cangeorgia-turn-538410.html
Knox County Public Defenders Community Law Office. (n.d.). Organizational strategies paper. Knoxville, TN: Public Defender, 6th Judicial District and Community Law Office.
Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. (2000). Focus groups: A practical guide for applied research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Marrus, E. (2003). Best interests equals zealous advocacy: A not so radical view of holistic representation for children accused of crime. Maryland Law Review, 62, 288-360.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Pinard, M. (2004). Broadening the holistic mindset: Incorporating collateral consequences and reentry into criminal defense lawyering. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 31, 1067-1095.
Quinn, M. C. (2000-2001). Whose team am I on anyway? Musings of a public defender about drug treatment court practice. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 26, 37-75.
Quinn, M. C. (2007). An RSVP to Professor Wexler's warm therapeutic jurisprudence invitation to the criminal defense bar: Unable to join you, already (somewhat similarly) engaged. Boston College Law Review, 48, 539-595.
Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing and Health, 23, 334-340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-240X(200008)23:4<334::AID-NUR9>3.0.CO;2-G
Smyth, M. (2005). Holistic is not a bad word: A criminal defense attorney's guide to using invisible punishments as an advocacy strategy. University of Toledo Law Review, 36, 479-504.
Steinberg, R. G. (2005). Beyond lawyering: How holistic representation makes for good policy, better lawyers and more satisfied clients. Retrieved from http://www.nycourts.gov/ip/partnersinjustice/
Steinberg, R., & Feige, D. (2004). Cultural revolution: Transforming the public defender's office. New York University Review of Law and Social Change, 29(1), 123-133.
Wertz, F. J. (2005) Phenomenological research methods for counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 152, 167-177. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.52.2.167
Wexler, B. (2005). Therapeutic jurisprudence and the rehabilitative role of the criminal defense lawyer. St. Thomas Law Review, 17, 743-774.