Explaining Welfare Benefits in the South: A Regional Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2013.34.0.162-178Abstract
This study examines whether the contemporary South can still be considered a meaningful political region by analyzing the political distinctiveness and political cohesion of the region. Political refers to the extent to which the states in the region are different from the rest of the country in relevant political characteristics. Political cohesion refers to the extent to which the states in the region are similar to each other in relevant political characteristics. We find that for presidential and congressional voting, the South is at least as political distinctive now as it was in the 1980s, but the cohesion of the region has declined, at least for presidential voting. The ideological distinctiveness of the South, for both political elites and the mass electorate, also has not diminished since the 1980s, but again the ideological cohesion of the states has declined. Finally, the South remains considerably more conservative that the North when it comes to public policy outcomes, although on this dimension both the distinctiveness and the cohesion of the South are lower now than in the 1980s.References
Aistrup, Joseph A. 1996. The Southern Strategy Revisited: Republican Top-Down Advancement in the South. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
Bartley, Numan V., and Hugh D. Graham. 1975. Southern Politics and the Second Reconstruction. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Bass, Jack, and Walter DeVries. 1976. The Transformation of Southern Politics: Social Change and Political Consequences Since 1945. New York: Basic Books.
Beachler, Donald W. 2000. A Tale of Two Decades: Southern House Elections in the 1980s and 1990s. Southern Political Review 28:353-369. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2000.tb00579.x
Beck, Paul Allen, and Paul Lopatto. 1982. The End of Southern Distinctiveness. In Contemporary Southern Political Attitudes and Behavior, eds. Laurence W. Moreland, Tod A. Baker, and Robert P. Steed. New York: Praeger.
Berard, Stanley P. 2001. Southern Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Norman: Oklahoma University Press.
Black, Earl. 1976. Southern Governors and Civil Rights. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734555
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1992. The Vital South: How Presidents are Elected. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734579
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brown, Robert D., and John M. Bruce. 2010. Changing Party Fortunes in the South: A Federal Perspective. In Presidential Elections in the South, eds. Branwell DuBose Kapeluck, Robert P. Steed, Laurence W. Moreland. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Buchanan, Scott E. 2009. The Continued Convergence of Demographics and Issues. In Presidential Elections in the South: Putting 2008 in Political Context, eds. Branwell DuBose Kapeluck, Robert P. Steed, and Laurence W. Moreland. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.
Bullock, Charles S., III. 1988. Regional Realignment from an Officeholding Perspective. Journal of Politics 50:553-574. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131458
Bullock, Charles S., III, Donna R. Hoffman, and Ronald Keith Gaddie. 2005. The Consolidation of the White Southern Congressional Vote. Political Research Quarterly 58:231-243. https://doi.org/10.2307/3595625 https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800204
Bullock, Charles S., III, and Mark J. Rozell. 2010. The New Politics of the Old South, 4th ed. Landham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Carroll, Royce, Jeff Lewis, James Lo, Nolan McCarthy, Keith Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2011. DW-NOMINATE Scores with Bootstrapped Standard Errors. http://voteview.com/dwnominate.asp.
Cooper, Christopher A., and H. Gibbs Knotts. 2004. Defining Dixie: A State-Level Measure of the Modern Political South. The American Review of Politics 25:25-39. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2004.25.0.25-39
Cooper, Christopher A., and H. Gibbs Knotts. 2010a. Rethinking the Boundaries of the South. Southern Cultures 16:72-88. https://doi.org/10.1353/scu.2010.0002
Cooper, Christopher A., and H. Gibbs Knotts. 2010b. Declining Dixie: Regional Identification in the Modern American South. Social Forces 88:1083-1102. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0284
Cotter, Patrick R., and James Glen Stovall. 1990. The Conservative South? American Politics Quarterly 18:103-119. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9001800106
Cotter, Patrick R., Stephen D. Shaffer, and David A. Breaux. 2006. Issues, Ideology, and Political Opinions in the South. In Writing Southern Politics: Contemporary Interpretations and Future Directions, eds. Robert P. Steed and Laurence W. Moreland. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Grantham, Dewey W. 1988. The Life and Death of the Solid South: A Political History. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Hill, Kevin A., and Nicol C. Rae. 2000. What Happened to the Democrats in the South? U.S. House Elections, 1992-1996. Party Politics 6:5-22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068800006001001
Hood, M.V., III, and Seth C. McKee. 2010. What Made Carolina Blue? In-Migration and the 2008 North Carolina Presidential Vote. American Politics Research 38:266-302. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X09359379
Kapeluck, Branwell DuBose, Robert P. Steed, and Laurence W. Moreland, eds. 2010. Presidential Elections in the South: Putting 2008 in Political Context. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Knotts, H. Gibbs. 2009. Conclusion: Don't Whistle Past Dixie Yet. In A Paler Shade of Red: The 2008 Presidential Election in the South, eds. Branwell DuBose Kapeluck, Laurence W. Moreland, and Robert P. Steed. Fayetteville: University of Arkansas Press.
Knotts, H. Gibbs, Alan I. Abramowitz, Susan H. Allen, and Kyle L. Saunders. 2005. Issues, Ideology, and the Rise of Republican Identification Among Southern Whites, 1982-2000. American Review of Politics 26:291-304. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2005.26.0.291-304
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2000. Explaining Southern Republican Success in U.S. House Elections in the 1990s. American Review of Politics 21:179-199.
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2001. Ideological Realignment and Partisan Change in the American South, 1972-1996. Politics and Policy 29:337-360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2001.tb00595.x
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2009. Explaining Partisan Change among Northeastern Whites. Politics and Policy 37:1331-1355. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2009.00222.x
Lamis, Alexander P. 1984. The Two-Party South. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lublin, David. 2004. The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
MacManus, Susan A. 2012. The South's Changing Demographics. In The Oxford Handbook of Southern Politics, eds. Charles S. Bullock III and Mark J. Rozell New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381948.013.0003
McKee, Seth. 2010. Republican Ascendancy in Southern U.S. House Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Moreland, Laurence W., and Robert P. Steed. 2012. The South and Presidential Elections. In The Oxford Handbook of Southern Politics, eds. Charles S. Bullock III and Mark J. Rozell. New York: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195381948.013.0021
Prysby, Charles L. 1989. The Structure of Southern Electoral Behavior. American Politics Quarterly 17:163-180. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8901700204
Prysby, Charles L. 1996. Southern Congressional Election in the 1990s: The Dynamics of Change. American Review of Politics 17:23-46.
Prysby, Charles L., and Katherine Watkins. 2010. Change in Southern Congressional Elections: 2004-2008. American Review of Politics 31:179-201. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2010.31.0.179-201
Rae, Nicol C. 1994. Southern Democrats. New York: Oxford University Press.
Reiter, Howard. 2010. Partisan Trends in the South and Northeast: Political Ping-Pong. In New Directions in American Political Parties, ed. Jeffrey Stonecash. New York: Routledge.
Reiter, Howard, and Jeffrey Stonecash. 2011. Counter Realignment: Political Change in the Northeastern United States. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779305
Rice, Tom W., William P. McLean, and Amy J. Larsen. 2002. Southern Distinctiveness over Time, 1972-2000. American Review of Politics 23:193-220. https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2002.23.0.193-220
Scher, Richard K. 1997. Politics in the New South, 2nd ed. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Schreckhise, William, and Todd Shields. 2003. Ideological Realignment in the Contemporary U.S. Electorate, Revisited. Social Science Quarterly 84:596-612. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8403007
Shafer, Byron E., and Richard D. Johnston. 2001. The Transformation of Southern Politics Revisited: The House of Representatives as a Window. British Journal of Political Science 31:601-626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000230
Shafer, Byron E. and Richard D. Johnston. 2006. The End of Southern Exceptionalism: Class, Race, and Partisan Change in The Postwar South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674043466
Shaffer, Stephen D., Stacie Berry Pierce, and Steven A. Kohnke. 2000. Party Realignment in the South: A Multi-Level Analysis. American Review of Politics 21 :129-153.
Stanley, Harold W. 2006. Presidential Elections in the South. In Writing Southern Politics: Contemporary Interpretations and Future Directions, eds. Robert P. Steed, and Laurence W. Moreland. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Steed, Robert P., and Laurence W. Moreland. 1990. Searching for the Mind of the South in the Second Reconstruction. In The Disappearing South? Studies in Regional Change and Continuity, eds. Robert P. Steed and Laurence W. Moreland, and Tod A. Baker. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Whitby, Kenny J. and Franklin D. Gilliam, Jr. 1991. A Longitudinal Analysis of Competing Explanations for the Transformation of Southern Congressional Politics. Journal of Politics 53:504-518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131770
Woodard, J. David. 2006. The New Southern Politics. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
