Electoral Incongruence and Delayed Republican Gains in Southern State Legislatures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2016.35.2.73-102Abstract
This paper investigates the impact of electoral incongruence – the tendency of Democratic state legislative candidates to perform better than their co-partisans in higher-level races – on partisan control of southern legislative chambers in the 1990s and 2000s. Using precinct-level data from five southern states, I examine incongruence between presidential and state house election results and show how such incongruence delayed the Republican consolidation of power in southern legislatures during this period. I then develop and test an account of electoral incongruence focusing on the tendency of older white southerners and those living in rural areas to split their tickets across state and federal offices, particularly when given the option of voting for conservative Democratic legislative incumbents. Lastly, I explore possible reasons for electoral incongruence’s recent decline. The results of the paper provide important insights concerning the delayed Republican takeover of southern legislatures, an underexplored aspect of southern partisan change. They also speak to longstanding questions in the state politics literature about the extent of autonomy that state party systems can hope to enjoy in a highly nationalized era.References
Abramowitz, Alan I. and H. Gibbs Knotts. 2006. "Ideological Realignment in the American Electorate: A Comparison of Northern and Southern White Voters in the Pre-Reagan, Reagan, and Post-Reagan Eras." Politics and Policy 34(1): 94-108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2006.00005.x
Aistrup, Joseph A. 1996. The southern Strategy Revisited: Republican Top-Down Advancement in the South. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky Press.
Barth, Jay. 1992. "Dual Partisanship in the South: Anachronism, or a Real Barrier to Republican Success in the Region?" Midsouth Political Science Journal 13: 487-500.
Bibby, John F. 1983. "Patterns in Midterm Gubernatorial and State Legislative Elections." Public Opinion 6: 41-46.
Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder. 2006. "Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses." Political Analysis 14: 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpi014
Brown, Robert D. and John M. Bruce. 2002. "Political Parties in State and Nation: Party Advantage and Party Competition in a Federal Setting." Party Politics 8: 635-656. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068802008006001
Brown, Robert D. and John M. Bruce. 2008. "Partisan-Ideological Divergence and Changing Party Fortunes in the States, 1968-2003: A Federal Perspective." Political Research Quarterly 61(4): 585-597. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908317795
Bullock, Charles S. 1988. "Creeping Realignment in the South." In The South's New Politics: Realignment and Dealignment, edited by R.H. Swansbrough and D.M. Brodsky, 220-237. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.
Campbell, James E. 1986. "Presidentail Coattails and Midterm Losses in State Legislative Elections." American Political Science Review 80(1): 45-63. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957083
Carmines, Edward G. and Harold W. Stanley. 1990. "Ideological Realignment in the Contemporary South: Where Have All the Conservatives Gone?" In The Disappearing South: Studies in Regional Change and Continuity, edited by L.W. Moreland and T.A. Baker. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama Press.
Carson, Jamie L., Michael H. Crespin, Charles J. Finocchiaro, and David W. Rhode. 2007. "Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives." American Politics Research 35(6): 878-904. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07304263
Converse, Philip E. 1966. "On the Possibility of a Major Realignment in the South." In Elections and the Political Order, edited by A. Campbell. New York: John Wiley.
Gelman, Andrew and Jennifer Hill. 2007. Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models. New York: Cambridge.
Gimpel, James G. 1995. National Elections and the Autonomy of State Party Systems. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Hadley, Charles D. 1985. "Dual Partisan Identification in the South." Journal of Politics 47: 254-268. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131075
Hillygus, D. Sunshine and Todd Shields. 2008. "Southern Discomfort? Regional Differences in Voter Decision Making in the 2000 Presidential Election." Presidential Studies Quarterly 38 (3): 506-520. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.02658.x
Key, V.O. 1956. American State Politics. New York: Knopf.
Klarner, Carl, William Berry, Thomas Carsey, Malcolm Jewell, Richard Niemi, Lynda Powell, and James Snyder. 2013. State Legislative Election Returns (1967-2013). ICPSR34297-v1. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2013-01-11. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR34297.v1
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2006. "Explaining Recent Changes in the Partisan Identifications of Southern Whites." Political Research Quarterly 59(1): 57-70. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900106
Lublin, David. 2004. The Republican South: Democratization and Partisan Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lublin, David, and D. Stephen Voss. 2001. "Federal Elections Project." American University, Washington, DC and the University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY.
McDonald, Michael P. 2014. "Presidential Vote within State Legislative Districts." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 14(2): 196-204. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532440014529291
McKee, Seth C. 2010. Republican Ascendancy in southern U.S. House Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Petrocik, John R. 1987. "Realignment: New Party Coalitions and the Nationalization of the South." Journal of Politics 49(2): 347-375. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131305
Schaller, Thomas F. 2008. Whistling Past Dixie: How Democrats Can Win Without the South. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Shor, Boris and Nolan McCarty. 2011. "The Ideological Mapping of American Legislatures." American Political Science Review 105(3): 530-551. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055411000153
Stein, Robert M. 1990. "Economic Voting for Governor and U.S. Senator: The Electoral Consequences of Federalism." Journal of Politics 52(1): 29-53. https://doi.org/10.2307/2131418
Steenbergen, Marco R. and Bradford S. Jones. 2002. "Modeling Multilevel Data Structures." American Journal of Political Science 46(1): 218-237. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088424
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
