Repealing “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell”: The Impact of Stereotypes on Attitudes toward Homosexuals in the Military
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2013.34.0.85-102Abstract
On December 22, 2010, President Barack Obama signed the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell Repeal Act of 2010. This decision appears to coincide with public opinion as a December 2010 Gallup Poll reports that 67 percent of respondents would support openly gay or lesbian individuals serving in the military. Nevertheless, many Republican Congressmen and presidential candidates continue to express support of “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.” To that end, this research investigates media priming, stereotypes of gays and lesbians, and other factors that may impact support for gay men and lesbians in the military. We use a survey-based experiment drawn from a mid-sized regional university in the southeast where the collection of attitudes toward gays and lesbians preceded the collection of atti- tudes toward homosexuals in the military. Our research points to the media’s ability to prime evalua- tions of gays in the military and suggests that stereotypes of homosexuals are powerful predictors of attitudes toward homosexuals serving in the military. We also find that personal familiarity with gay men/lesbians is related to support for homosexuals serving in the military.References
Alport, Gordon W. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.
Barth, Jay, L. Marvin Overby, and Scott H. Huffmon. 2009. Community Context, Personal Contact, and Support for an Anti-Gay Rights Referendum. Political Research Quarterly 62(2):355-365. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912908317033
Bailey, Mandi B. 2011. Gay Candidates, Group Stereotypes, and the News Media: An Experimental Design. Presented at the Southern Political Science Association Annual Meeting.
Bowman, Karlyn. 2006. Attitudes about Homosexuality and Gay Marriage. American Enterprise Institute's Short Publications, http://www.aei.org/publications/pubID.14882.filter.all/pub_detail.asp.
Brewer, Paul R. 2003. The Shifting Foundations of Public Opinion about Gay Rights. Journal of Politics 65:1208-1220. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00133
Calzo, Jerel P., and Monique Ward. 2009. Media Exposure and Viewers' Attitudes toward Homosexuality: Evidence for Mainstreaming or Resonance? Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media 53:280-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08838150902908049
Craig, Stephen, Michael D. Martinez, James G. Kane, and Jason Gainous. 2005. Core Values, Value Conflict, and Citizen's Ambivalence about Gay Rights. Political Research Quarterly 58:5-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800101 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3595591
Department of Defense Directive. 1982. Enlisted Administrative Separations. DODD 1332.14.
Doan, Alesha E., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. 2010. The Role of Intersectional Stereotypes on Evaluations of Gay and Lesbian Political Candidates. Politics and Gender 6:63-91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X09990511
Don't Ask, Don't Tell Repeal Act of 2010. 2010. Pub. L. No. 111-321.
Fridkin, Kim L., Patrick J. Kennedy, and Gina Seringnese Woodall. 2009. Bad for Men, Better for Women: The Impact of Stereotypes during Negative Campaigns. Political Behavior 31:53-77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11109-008-9065-x
Gienger, Viola, and Flavia Krause-Jackson. 2011. Obama, Pentagon Certify End of Gay Ban Won't Harm Military. Bloomberg News, http://www.bloomberg.com/news/ 2011-07-22/obama-pentagon-certify-end-of-gay-ban-won-t-harm-military-1-.html (June 8, 2008).
Golebiowska, Ewa A., and Cynthia J. Thomsen. 1999. Dynamics of Attitudes towards Openly Gay and Lesbian Political Candidates. In Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process, eds. Ellen D.B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock. New York: Columbia University Press.
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2000. The Etiology of Individual-Targeted Intolerance: Group Stereotypes and Judgments of Individual Group Members. Political Psychology 21:443-464. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00198
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2001. Group Stereotypes in Political Evaluation. American Politics Research 29:535-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X01029006001
Golebiowska, Ewa A. 2003. When to Tell? Disclosure of Concealable Group Membership, Stereotypes, and Political Evaluation. Political Behavior 25:313-337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/B:POBE.0000004061.08643.7d
Haeberle. Steven H. 1999. Gay and Lesbian Rights: Emerging Trends in Public Opinion and Voting Behavior." In Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process, eds. Ellen D.B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock. New York: Columbia University Press.
Herek, Gregory. 2002. Gender Gaps in Public Opinion about Lesbians and Gay Men. Public Opinion Quarterly 66(1):40-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/338409
Herek, Gregory. 2009. U.S. Public: Repeal "Don't Ask, Don't Tell." Palm Center, available online at http://www.palmcenter.org/node/1329.
Herrick, Rebekha, and Sue Thomas. 1999. The Effects of Sexual Orientation on Citizen Perceptions of Candidate Viability. In Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process, eds. Ellen D.B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock. New York: Columbia University Press.
Kite, Mary E., and Kay Deaux. 1987. Gender Belief Systems: Homosexuality and the Implicit Inversion Theory. Psychology of Women Quarterly 11(1):83-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1987.tb00776.x
Kite, Mary E., and Bernard E. Whitley, Jr. 1996. Do Heterosexual Men and Women Differ in their Attitudes toward Homosexuality? In Stigma and Sexual Orientation: Understanding Prejudice Against Lesbians, Gay men and Bisexuals, ed. Gregory M. Herek. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lewis, Gregory B. 1997. Lifting the Ban on Gays in the Civil Service: Federal Policy toward Gay and Lesbian Employees since the Cold War. Public Administration Review 57(5):387-895. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3109985
Lewis, Gregory B. and Mark Rogers. 1999. Does the Public Support Equal Employment Rights for Gays and Lesbians? In Gays and Lesbians in the Democratic Process, eds. Ellen D.B. Riggle and Barry L. Tadlock. New York: Columbia University Press.
Lewis, Gregory B. 2003. Black-White Differences in Attitudes toward Homosexuality and Gay Rights. Public Opinion Quarterly 67:59-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/346009
Lewis, Gregory B. 2011. The Friends and Family Plan: Contact with Gays and Support for Gay Rights. Policy Study Journal 39:217-238. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00405.x
Loftus, Jeni. 2001. America's Liberalization in Attitudes toward Homosexuality, 1973 to 1998. American Sociological Review 66:762-782. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088957
Morales, Lymari. 2010. In U.S., 67% Support Repealing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell.' Gallup Politics, http://www.gallup.com/poll/145130/support-repealing-don't-askdont-tell.aspx (June 8, 2008).
Moradi, Bonnie, and Laura Miller. 2009. Attitudes of Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans toward Gay and Lesbian Service Members. Armed Forces and Society XX(X):1-23.
Murphy, Sheila T. 1996. The Impact of Factional Versus Fictional Media Portrayals on Cultural Stereotypes. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 560:165-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716298560001013
Negy, Charles, and Russell Eisenman. 2005. A Comparison of African and White College Students' Affective and Attitudinal Reactions to Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Individuals: An Exploratory Study. Journal of Sex Research 42(4):291-298. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00224490509552284
Overby L. Marvin, and Jay Barth. 2000. Contact, Community, and Public Attitudes toward Gay Men and Lesbians. Polity 34:433-456.
Peffley, M.A., and Hurwitz, J. 2002. The Racial Components of 'Race Neutral' Crime Policy Attitudes. Political Psychology 23:59-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00270
Sherrill, Kenneth, and Alan Yang. 2000. From Outlaws to In-Laws. Public Perspective 11:20-23.
Taylor, Marisa. May 20, 2012. NAACP Board Votes in Support of Same-Sex Marriage. ABCNews, http://abcnews.go.com/US/naacp-board-votes-support-sex-marriage/story?id=16387644 (June 5, 2012).
Torres-Reyna, Oscar, and Robert Y. Shapiro. 2002. The Polls – Trends: Women and Sexual Orientation in the Military. Public Opinion Quarterly 66:618-632. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/343865
Wilcox, Clyde, and Barbara Norrander. 2002. Of Moods and Morals: The Dynamics of Opinion on Abortion and Gay Rights. In Understanding Public Opinion, 2nd ed., eds. Barbara Norrander and Clyde Wilcox. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Wilcox, Clyde, and Robert Wolpert. 2000. Gay Rights in the Public Sphere: Public Opinion on Gay and Lesbian Equality. In The Politics of Gay Rights, eds. Craig A. Rimmerman, Kenneth Wald, and Clyde Wilcox. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Valentino, Nicholas A. 1999. Crime News and the Priming of Racial Attitudes During Evaluations of the President. Public Opinion Quarterly 63:293-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/297722
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
