On Demographic Change and Competitive Equilibrium in American Politics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-779X.2016.35.2.27-47Abstract
In their seminal analysis of American elections, Stokes and Iversen (1962) demonstrated that each party’s share of the vote never strays very far from a competitive equilibrium. However, it is difficult to envision how this equilibrium will maintain amid changing demographics. The Republican leaning white proportion of the electorate is shrinking while the Democratic leaning Latino and Asian proportion is rapidly growing. These demographic changes threaten to tip the partisan balance in favor of the Democrats. Can the competitive equilibrium hold amid changing demographics? I answer this question in three steps. First, I analyze presidential election returns since the end of the Civil War. I confirm the presence of a competitive equilibrium. I then use a set of simulations to establish that demographic changes will tip the partisan balance in favor of the Democrats. I then assess how much the Republican Party will have to increase its level of support among whites and/or other groups to remain competitive. I find that relatively modest changes in white and/or Latino and Asian voting behavior will be sufficient to give the Republican Party an even chance of winning well into the future.
References
Axelrod, R. 1972. Where the Votes Come From: An Analysis of Electoral Coalitions, American Political Science Review, 66(1): 11-20 https://doi.org/10.2307/1959275
Bartels, L. 1998. Electoral Continuity and Change, 1868-1996. Electoral Studies, 17(3): 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00035-3
Bartels, L. 2006. What's the Matter with 'What's the Matter with Kansas,' Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1: 210-226. https://doi.org/10.1561/100.00000010
Black, D. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Bowler, S. & Segura, G.M. 2012. The Future is Ours: Minority Politics, Political Behavior, and the Multiracial Era of American Politics. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Budge, I., Keman, H., McDonald, M.D. & Pennings P. 2012. Organizing Democratic Choice, Party Representation Over Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199654932.001.0001
Carsey, T. & Harden, J. 2014. Monte Carol Simulation and Resampling Methods for the Social Sciences. SAGE.
Craig, M. & Richeson, J. 2014. More Diverse Yet Less Tolerant, How the Increasingly Diverse Racial Landscape Affects White Americans' Racial Attitudes, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, doi:10.1177/0146167214524993 https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214524993
Downs, A. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
Duncan, B. & Trejo, S.J. 2011. Tracking Intergenerational Progress for Immigrant Groups: The Problem of Ethnic Attrition, American Economic Review, 101(3): 603-608. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.3.603
Erikson, R.S. & Wlezien, C. 2012. The Timeline of Presidential Elections: How Campaigns Do (and do not) Matter. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226922164.001.0001
Erikson, R.S., Stimson, J. & MacKuen, M. 2002. The Macro Polity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Frymer, P. 2010. Uneasy Alliances: Race and Party Competition in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hanjal, Z. & Lee, T. 2011. Why Americans Don't Join the Party: Race, Immigration and the Failure (of Political Parties) to Engage the Electorate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Hajnal, Z & Rivera, M 2014. Immigration, Latinos, and White Partisan Politics: The New Democratic Defection, American Journal of Political Science, 58(4): 773-789. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12101
Hotelling, H. 1929. Stability in Competition. The Economic Journal, 39: 41-57. https://doi.org/10.2307/2224214
Kaufmann, K. & Petrocik, J. 1999. The Changing Politics of American Men: Understanding the Sources of the Gender Gap, American Journal of Political Science, 43(3): 864-887. https://doi.org/10.2307/2991838
Lewis-Beck, M. 1990. Economics and Elections: The Major Western Democracies. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8153
Lewis-Beck, M. & Nadeau, R. 2001. Economic Voting in U.S. Presidential Elections, Journal of Politics, 63(1): 159-181. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00063
Mayhew, D.R. 2011. Partisan Balance: Why Political Parties Don't Kill the U.S. Constitutional System. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
McDonald, M.D. & Best, R. 2006. Equilibria and Restoring Forces in Models of Vote Dynamics, Political Analysis, 14: 369-392. https://doi.org/10.1093/pan/mpj008
Meffert, M.F., Norpoth, H. & Ruhil, A. 2001. Realignment and Macropartisanship, American Political Science Review, 95(4): 953-962.
Merrill, S., Groffman, B. & Brunell, T. 2008. Cycles in American National Electoral Politics, 1854-2006: Statistical Evidence and an Explanatory Model, American Political Science Review, 102(1): 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055408080064
Miller, G & Schofield, N. 2008. The Transformation of the Republican and Democratic Party Coalitions in the U.S. Perspectives on Politics, 6(3): 433-450. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592708081218
Norpoth, H. & Rusk, J.G. 2007. Electoral Myth and Reality: Realignments in American Politics, Electoral Studies, 26(2): 392-403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2006.10.017
Petrocik, J. 1981. Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Pew Hispanic Center, 2011. 2011 National Survey of Latinos. http://www.pewhispanic.org/category/datasets/?download=19140
Robbins, S.M. & Norpoth, H. 2010. Balance or Dominance? Party Competition in Congressional Politics, Political Research Quarterly, 63(2); 316-327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912908328859
Robinson, G., Krasno, J., Zingher, J. and Allen, M. 2015. Creating a Racially Polarized Electorate: the Partisan Fallout of Immigration Politics in Arizona and California, Politics, Groups, and Identities, http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21565503.2015.1050417
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semisoverign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America. Boston, MA: Wadsworth.
Schlesinger, A.M. Jr. 1999. The Cycles of American History. New York, NY: Mariner Books
Schofield, N. & Miller, G. 2007. Elections and Activist Coalitions in the United States. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3): 518-531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2007.00265.x
Schofield, N., Miller, G. & Martin, A. 2003. Critical Elections and Political Realignments in the USA: 1860-2000. Political Studies, 51: 217-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923X.00181-i1
Stokes, D. 1962. Party Loyalty and the Likelihood of Deviating Elections. Journal of Politics, 24(4): 689-702. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381600016182
Stokes, D. & Iversen, G. 1962. On the Existence of Forces Restoring Party Competition, Public Opinion Quarterly, 26(2): 159-171. https://doi.org/10.1086/267086
Teixeira, R. & Judis, J. 2004. The Emerging Democratic Majority. New York, NY: A Lisa Drew Book/Scribner.
Tichenor, D. 2009. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Trende, S. 2012. The Lost Majority: Why the Future of Government is Up for Grabs—and Who Will Take It. New York, NY: Palgrave-MacMillan.
Trende, S. 2013. Are we in Electoral Realignment? In Barack Obama and the New America: The 2012 Election and the Changing Face of Politics, Ed. Larry J. Sabato. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Press.
Wlezien, C. 2000. An Essay on 'Combined' Time Series Processes, Electoral Studies, 19(1): 77-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(99)00037-2
Wlezien, C. & Erikson, R.S. 2002. The Timeline of Presidential Election Campaigns, Journal of Politics, 64(4): 969-993. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.00159
Zingher, J.N. 2014. An Analysis of the Changing Social Bases of America's Political Parties: 1952-2008, Electoral Studies, 35: 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.02.003
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
