Gender and Roll Call Voting Behavior in Congress: A Cross-Chamber Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2013.34.0.1-20Abstract
Numerous studies have examined the roll call voting behavior of women in Congress. Much of this scholarship has focused on whether female legislators tend to be more liberal than their male colleagues. However, most of this research has examined whether gender differences exist within a specific legislative chamber. This paper seeks to build on this past research by exploring whether the relationship between the descriptive and substantive representation of women is contingent upon the institutional context in which female legislators serve. Using Common Space Scores which estimate the roll call voting behavior of U.S. Senators and U.S. House members on a scale that allows for comparisons across each chamber this study analyzes the voting records of Female Senators, Male Senators, Female House Members and Male House Members in the 109th-111th Congresses. The results show that in the contemporary Congress, gender exerts minimal influence on how legislators cast their votes with the exception of female Republican Senators who are noticeably more liberal than Republicans in both the House and Senate.References
Aldrich, John H., Michael Brady, Scott de Marchi, Ian McDonald, Brendan Nyhan, David W. Rohde, and Michael Tofias. 2008. Party and Constituency in the U.S. Senate, 1933-2004. In Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. eds. Nathan Monroe, Jason M. Roberts, and David W. Rohde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226534947.003.0003
Ardoin, Phillip J., and James C. Garrand. 2003. Measuring Constituency Ideology in U.S. House Districts: A Top Down Simulation Approach. Journal of Politics 65:1165- 1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00131
Binder, Sarah A., and Steven Smith. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Boles, Janet K., and Katherine Scheurer. 2007. Beyond Women, Children and Families: Gender, Representation, and Public Funding for the Arts. Social Science Quarterly 88:39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00445.x
Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2010. Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging. American Journal of Political Science 54:389-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00437.x
Brady, David, and Edward P. Schwartz. 1995. Ideology and Interests and Interests in Congressional Voting: The Politics of Voting in the U.S. Senate. Public Choice 85:25-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01047799
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigns for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14231
Clark, Janet. 1998. Women at the National Level: An Update on Roll Call Voting Behavior. In Women in Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and Matthew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791123
Davidson, Roger H., Walter J. Oleszek, and Francis E. Lee. 2009. Congress and Its Members. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198296746.001.0001
Dolan, Julie. 1997. Support Form Women's Interests in the 103rd Congress: The Distinct Impact of Congressional Women. Women and Politics 18:81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.1997.9970831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J014v18n04_05
Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright. 2008. Voters, Candidates and Issues in Congressional Elections. In Congress Reconsidered, 9th ed., eds. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Evans, Jocelyn Jones. 2005. Women, Partisanship and the Congress. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403978905
Fleisher, Richard, and John R. Bond. 2004. The Shrinking Middle in the U.S. Congress. British Journal of Political Science 34:429-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000122
Francovic, Kathleen. 1977. Sex and Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1961-1975. American Politics Quarterly 5:515-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673x7700500305
Frederick, Brian. 2009. Are Women Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship between the Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Congress and the Presidency 36:181-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07343460902948097
Frederick, Brian. 2010. Gender and Patterns of Roll Call Voting in the U.S. Senate. Congress and Presidency 37:103-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07343460903390711
Frederick, Brian. 2011. Gender Turnover and Roll Call Voting in the U.S. Senate. Journal of Women Politics and Policy 32:193-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.589281
Fridkin, Kim L., and Gina Serignese Woodall. 2005. Different Portraits, Different Leaders? Gender Differences in U.S. Senators' Presentation of Self. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gailmard, Sean, and Jeffery A. Jenkins. 2008. Minority-Party Power in the Senate and House of Representatives. In Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate, eds. Nathan Monroe, Jason M. Roberts, and David W. Rohde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226534947.003.0010
Gerrity, Jessica C., Tracy Osborn, and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez. 2007. Women and Representation: A Different View of the District? Politics & Gender 3:179-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07000025
Hetherington, Marc J. 2009. Putting Polarization in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 39:413-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501
Lee, Francis E. 2008. Dividers, Not Uniters: Presidential Leadership and Senate Partisanship, 1981-2004. Journal of Politics 70:914-928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080961
Lee, Francis E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. John R. Bond and Richard Fleischer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 7th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
Osborn, Tracy, and Jeanette Moorhouse Menendez. 2010. Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate. Journal of Women Politics and Policy 31:1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15544770903501384
Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Pearson, Kathryn L. 2008. Party Loyalty and Discipline in the Individualistic Senate. In Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate, eds. Nathan Monroe, Jason M. Roberts, and David W. Rohde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226534947.003.0006
Pearson, Kathryn L. 2009. Gendered Partisanship in the U.S. House and Senate. Paper presented at the Conference on Legislative Elections, Process and Policy: The Influence of Bicameralism, Vanderbilt University, October 22-24.
Peters, Ronald M., and Cindy Simon Rosenthal. 2010. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the New American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383737.001.0001
Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614644
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 2007. Ideology and Congress. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Reingold, Beth. 2008. Women as Officeholders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation. In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Christina Wolbrecht, Karen Beckwith and Lisa Baldez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790621.011
Rocca, Michael S., Gabriel R. Sanchez, and Joseph Uscinski. 2008. Personal Attributes and Latino Voting Behavior in Congress. Social Science Quarterly 89:392-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00538.x
Schickler, Eric. 2005. Institutional Development of Congress. In Institutions of American Democracy: The Legislative Branch, eds., Paul J. Quirk and Sarah A. Binder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Renato Corbetta. 2004. Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29:215-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201159
Shor, Boris, Christopher Berry, and Nolan McCarthy. 2010. A Bridge to Somewhere: Mapping State and Congressional Ideology on a Cross-institutional Common Space. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35:417-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298010792069198
Simon, Dennis M., and Barbara Palmer 2010. The Roll Call Voting Behavior of Men and Women in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1937-2008. Politics and Gender 6:225-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1000005X
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2007. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2009. The New World of U.S. Senators. In Congress Reconsidered, 9th ed., eds. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Sorok, Carolyn. 2010. Closing the Gap Legislatively: Consequences of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Chicago Kent Law Review 85:1199.
Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2006. Political Parties Matter: Realignment and the Return of Partisan Voting. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
Swers, Michele L. 1998. Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:435-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440362
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swers, Michele L. 2007. Building a Reputation on National Security: The Impact of Stereotypes Related to Gender and Military Experience. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32:559-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298007782398512
Swers, Michele L. 2008. Policy Leadership Beyond 'Women's Issues.' In Legislative Women: Getting Elected, Getting Ahead, ed. Beth Reingold. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
Tatalovich, Raymond, and David Schier. 1993. The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives. American Politics Research 21:125-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100108
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790652
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu.
Wawro, Gregory J., and Eric Schickler. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Welch, Susan. 1985. Are Women More Liberal than Men in the U.S. Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440119
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Aldrich, John H., Michael Brady, Scott de Marchi, Ian McDonald, Brendan Nyhan, David W. Rohde, and Michael Tofias. 2008. Party and Constituency in the U.S. Senate, 1933-2004. In Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate. eds. Nathan Monroe, Jason M. Roberts, and David W. Rohde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226534947.003.0003
Ardoin, Phillip J., and James C. Garrand. 2003. Measuring Constituency Ideology in U.S. House Districts: A Top Down Simulation Approach. Journal of Politics 65:1165- 1189. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00131
Binder, Sarah A., and Steven Smith. 1997. Politics or Principle: Filibustering in the U.S. Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Boles, Janet K., and Katherine Scheurer. 2007. Beyond Women, Children and Families: Gender, Representation, and Public Funding for the Arts. Social Science Quarterly 88:39-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00445.x
Boyd, Christina L., Lee Epstein, and Andrew D. Martin. 2010. Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging. American Journal of Political Science 54:389-411. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00437.x
Brady, David, and Edward P. Schwartz. 1995. Ideology and Interests and Interests in Congressional Voting: The Politics of Voting in the U.S. Senate. Public Choice 85:25-48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01047799
Burrell, Barbara C. 1994. A Woman's Place is in the House: Campaigns for Congress in the Feminist Era. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.3998/mpub.14231
Clark, Janet. 1998. Women at the National Level: An Update on Roll Call Voting Behavior. In Women in Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cox, Gary W., and Matthew D. McCubbins. 2005. Setting the Agenda: Responsible Party Government in the U.S. House of Representatives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511791123
Davidson, Roger H., Walter J. Oleszek, and Francis E. Lee. 2009. Congress and Its Members. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Dodson, Debra L. 2006. The Impact of Women in Congress. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198296746.001.0001
Dolan, Julie. 1997. Support Form Women's Interests in the 103rd Congress: The Distinct Impact of Congressional Women. Women and Politics 18:81-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.1997.9970831 http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J014v18n04_05
Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright. 2008. Voters, Candidates and Issues in Congressional Elections. In Congress Reconsidered, 9th ed., eds. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Evans, Jocelyn Jones. 2005. Women, Partisanship and the Congress. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403978905
Fleisher, Richard, and John R. Bond. 2004. The Shrinking Middle in the U.S. Congress. British Journal of Political Science 34:429-451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123404000122
Francovic, Kathleen. 1977. Sex and Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives: 1961-1975. American Politics Quarterly 5:515-530. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673x7700500305
Frederick, Brian. 2009. Are Women Still More Liberal in a Polarized Era? The Conditional Nature of the Relationship between the Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Congress and the Presidency 36:181-202. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07343460902948097
Frederick, Brian. 2010. Gender and Patterns of Roll Call Voting in the U.S. Senate. Congress and Presidency 37:103-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07343460903390711
Frederick, Brian. 2011. Gender Turnover and Roll Call Voting in the U.S. Senate. Journal of Women Politics and Policy 32:193-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2011.589281
Fridkin, Kim L., and Gina Serignese Woodall. 2005. Different Portraits, Different Leaders? Gender Differences in U.S. Senators' Presentation of Self. In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gailmard, Sean, and Jeffery A. Jenkins. 2008. Minority-Party Power in the Senate and House of Representatives. In Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate, eds. Nathan Monroe, Jason M. Roberts, and David W. Rohde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226534947.003.0010
Gerrity, Jessica C., Tracy Osborn, and Jeanette Morehouse Mendez. 2007. Women and Representation: A Different View of the District? Politics & Gender 3:179-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X07000025
Hetherington, Marc J. 2009. Putting Polarization in Perspective. British Journal of Political Science 39:413-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123408000501
Lee, Francis E. 2008. Dividers, Not Uniters: Presidential Leadership and Senate Partisanship, 1981-2004. Journal of Politics 70:914-928. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381608080961
Lee, Francis E. 2009. Beyond Ideology: Politics, Principles, and Partisanship in the U.S. Senate. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226470771.001.0001
Jacobson, Gary C. 2000. Party Polarization in National Politics: The Electoral Connection. In Polarized Politics: Congress and the President in a Partisan Era, eds. John R. Bond and Richard Fleischer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Jacobson, Gary C. 2009. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 7th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.
Osborn, Tracy, and Jeanette Moorhouse Menendez. 2010. Speaking as Women: Women and Floor Speeches in the Senate. Journal of Women Politics and Policy 31:1-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15544770903501384
Palmer, Barbara, and Dennis Simon. 2008. Breaking the Political Glass Ceiling: Women and Congressional Elections, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.
Pearson, Kathryn L. 2008. Party Loyalty and Discipline in the Individualistic Senate. In Why Not Parties? Party Effects in the United States Senate, eds. Nathan Monroe, Jason M. Roberts, and David W. Rohde. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226534947.003.0006
Pearson, Kathryn L. 2009. Gendered Partisanship in the U.S. House and Senate. Paper presented at the Conference on Legislative Elections, Process and Policy: The Influence of Bicameralism, Vanderbilt University, October 22-24.
Peters, Ronald M., and Cindy Simon Rosenthal. 2010. Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the New American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195383737.001.0001
Poole, Keith T. 2005. Spatial Models of Parliamentary Voting. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511614644
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 2007. Ideology and Congress. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Reingold, Beth. 2008. Women as Officeholders: Linking Descriptive and Substantive Representation. In Political Women and American Democracy, eds. Christina Wolbrecht, Karen Beckwith and Lisa Baldez. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790621.011
Rocca, Michael S., Gabriel R. Sanchez, and Joseph Uscinski. 2008. Personal Attributes and Latino Voting Behavior in Congress. Social Science Quarterly 89:392-405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2008.00538.x
Schickler, Eric. 2005. Institutional Development of Congress. In Institutions of American Democracy: The Legislative Branch, eds., Paul J. Quirk and Sarah A. Binder. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schwindt-Bayer, Leslie A., and Renato Corbetta. 2004. Gender Turnover and Roll-Call Voting in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29:215-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201159
Shor, Boris, Christopher Berry, and Nolan McCarthy. 2010. A Bridge to Somewhere: Mapping State and Congressional Ideology on a Cross-institutional Common Space. Legislative Studies Quarterly 35:417-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298010792069198
Simon, Dennis M., and Barbara Palmer 2010. The Roll Call Voting Behavior of Men and Women in the U.S. House of Representatives, 1937-2008. Politics and Gender 6:225-246. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X1000005X
Sinclair, Barbara. 2006. Party Wars: Polarization and the Politics of National Policy Making. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2007. Unorthodox Lawmaking: New Legislative Processes in the U.S. Congress, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Sinclair, Barbara. 2009. The New World of U.S. Senators. In Congress Reconsidered, 9th ed., eds. Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Sorok, Carolyn. 2010. Closing the Gap Legislatively: Consequences of the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act. Chicago Kent Law Review 85:1199.
Stonecash, Jeffrey M. 2006. Political Parties Matter: Realignment and the Return of Partisan Voting. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
Swers, Michele L. 1998. Are Women More Likely to Vote for Women's Issue Bills than Their Male Colleagues? Legislative Studies Quarterly 23:435-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440362
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make: The Policy Impact of Women in Congress. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Swers, Michele L. 2007. Building a Reputation on National Security: The Impact of Stereotypes Related to Gender and Military Experience. Legislative Studies Quarterly 32:559-596. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298007782398512
Swers, Michele L. 2008. Policy Leadership Beyond 'Women's Issues.' In Legislative Women: Getting Elected, Getting Ahead, ed. Beth Reingold. Boulder, CO: Lynne Reinner Publishers.
Tatalovich, Raymond, and David Schier. 1993. The Persistence of Ideological Cleavage in Voting on Abortion Legislation in the House of Representatives. American Politics Research 21:125-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9302100108
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790652
Tomz, Michael, Jason Wittenberg, and Gary King. 2003. CLARIFY: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results. Version 2.1 Cambridge, MA: Harvard University. http://gking.harvard.edu.
Wawro, Gregory J., and Eric Schickler. 2006. Filibuster: Obstruction and Lawmaking in the U.S. Senate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Welch, Susan. 1985. Are Women More Liberal than Men in the U.S. Congress? Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440119
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions and Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.