Change in Southern Congressional Elections, 2004-2008
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2010.31.0.179-201Abstract
This study examines change in southern congressional elections from 2004 to 2008 through a longitudinal analysis of district-level data. We hypothesize that change in the district congressional vote division will be influenced by: (a) change in the presidential vote in the district; and (b) change in the campaign efforts of the two parties. These are the hypotheses of central interest in this study. We also hypothesize that change in the congressional vote will be affected by: (c) the difference between the presidential and congressional vote in the district in 2004; and (d) change in the incumbency status of the two parties in the district. However, these hypotheses are of secondary interest; the variables are included primarily to make our models complete. Our findings show that change in the presidential vote had a substantial increase on the congressional vote. Change in the Democratic campaign effort also had an effect, but it was smaller than the effect of the presidential vote change. Change in the Republican campaign effort did not have a significant effect, but we urge caution in interpreting this result.References
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Alan Gerber. 1994. The Mismeasure of Campaign Spending: Evidence from the 1990 U.S. House Elections. Journal of Politics 56:1106-1118. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2132077
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1992. The Vital South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734579
Bond, Jon, Cary Covington, and Richard Fleisher. 1985. Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics 47:510-529. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2130894
Gelman, Andrew, and Gary King. 1990. Measuring Incumbency Without Bias. American Journal of Political Science 34:1142-1164. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111475
Glaser, James M. 2005. The Hand of the Past in Contemporary Southern Politics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Green, Donald, and Jonathon Krasno. 1988. Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 32:884-907. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111193
Green, Donald, and Jonathon Krasno. 1990. Rebuttal to Jacobson's 'New Evidence for Old Arguments' American Journal of Political Science 34:363-372. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111451
Jacobson, Gary. 1980. Money in Congressional Election. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Jacobson, Gary. 1989. Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections. American Political Science Review 83:773-794. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962060
Jacobson, Gary. 1990. The Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections: New Evidence for Old Arguments. American Journal of Political Science 34:334-362. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111450
Jacobson, Gary. 1997. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 4th ed. New York: Longman.
Jacobson, Gary, and Samuel Kernell. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Kenney, Christopher, and Michael McBurnett. 1994. An Individual-level Multiequation Model of Expenditure Effects in Contested House Elections. American Political Science Review 88:699-707. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2944804
Krashinsky, Michael, and William Milne. 1993. The Effects of Incumbency in U.S. Congressional Elections, 1950-1988. Legislative Studies Quarterly 18:321-344. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439829
Krasno, Jonathon, and Donald Green. 1988. Preempting Quality Challengers in House Elections. Journal of Politics 50:920-936. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131385
Lublin, David. 2004. The Republican South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Maisel, L. Sandy, Walter Stone, and Cherie Maestas. 1999. Reassessing the Definition of Quality Candidates. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association Meeting.
McKee, Seth. 2010. Republican Ascendancy in Southern U.S. House Elections. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Moser, Bob. 2008. Blue Dixie. New York: Henry Holt.
Prysby, Charles. 2000. Southern Congressional Elections in the 1990s: The Dynamics of Change. American Review of Politics 21:155-178.
Shafer, Byron E., and Richard Johnston. 2006. The End of Southern Exceptionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/9780674043466
Thomas, Scott. 1989. Do Incumbent Expenditures Matter? Journal of Politics 51:965-976. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131543
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
