Testing the Effects of Ballot Access Reform on Non-Major Party Electoral Fortunes: The Case of Florida's Revision 11
AbstractThe research tests the effects of egalitarian ballot access on the electoral fortunes of non-major party candidates for U.S. House seats. In 1998, Florida voters passed an amendment to the state constitution that removed all auxiliary barriers to ballot access for non-major parties. In bivariate and multiple regression testing, the reform is associated with a statistically significant increase in the number of non-major party candidates and their vote-share. The change, however, is small. Moreover, these increased contestation rates and vote support occur primarily in the first election cycle after the reform was adopted. Output from Tobit and GLS regression suggests that the best case scenario is about a 1.3 percent increase in the non-major party vote share in U.S. House races in Florida. The study concludes that states pursuit of egalitarian ballot access laws will not likely create substantive expansion of minor-party electoral success.
Adams, Greg D. 1996. Legislative Effects of Single-Member vs. Multi-Member Districts. American Journal of Political Science 40(February):129-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111697
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Jonathan Nagler. 1995. Economics, Issues and the Perot Candidacy: Voter Choice in the 1992 Presidential Election. American Journal of Political Science 39(3):714-744. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111651
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Alan Gerber. 1996. The Effects of Filing Fees and Petition Requirements on U.S. House Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 21(May):249-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440182
APSA (American Political Science Association) Committee on Political Parties. 1950. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. American Political Science Review 44 (Supplement).
Beck, Nathaniel, and Jonathan N. Katz. 1995. What to do (and not to do) with Time-Series Cross-Section data. American Political Science Review 89(September):634-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2082979
Boehlert, Eric. 2000. Al's Ballot Blues. November 16. http://archive.salon.com/politics/feature/2000/11/16/ballots/print.html (November 12, 2007).
Bowler, Shaun, and David J. Lanoue. 1992. Strategic and Protest Voting for Minor Parties: the Case of the Canadian NDP. Political Research Quarterly 45(2):485-499. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299204500211
Burden, Barry C. 2007. Ballot Regulations and Multiparty Politics in the States. PS 40(4):669-673. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096507071065
Burden, Barry C., and Steven Greene. 2000. Party Attachments and State Election Laws. Political Research Quarterly 53(March):63-76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/449246 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290005300103
Cobble, Steve, and Sarah Siskind. 2003. Fusion: Multiple Party Nominations in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for a New Democracy.
Dubin, Michael J. 2007. Party Affiliations in the State Legislatures: A Year by Year Summary, 1796-2006. Jefferson, NC: McFarland and Company.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties, Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
Dwyre, Diana, and Robin Kolodny. 1997. Barriers to Minor Party Success and Prospects for Change. In Multiparty Politics in American, eds. Paul S. Herrnson and John C. Green. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Evans, Eldon C. 1917. A History of the Australian Ballot System in the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Florida Constitution Article VI. Sections 1, 2, 5, 7. 1968. Revised by Revision No. 11, 1998.
Florida Department of State. Division of Elections. 1998. Election Results. 3 November 1998. http://election.dos.state.fl.us/elections/resultsarchive/Index.asp?ElectionDate=11/3/1998&DATAMODE= (November 1, 2007).
Gold, Howard J. 1995. Minor Party Voting in Presidential Elections: A Study of Perot, Anderson, and Wallace. Political Research Quarterly 48(December):751-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448973
Herrnson, Paul S. 1997. Two-Party Dominance and Minor Party Forays in American Politics. In Multiparty Politics in American, eds. Paul S. Herrnson and John C. Green. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 2007. Party Politics in America, 12th ed. New York: Longman. Hicks, John D. 1933. The Minor Party Tradition in American Politics. The Mississippi Valley Historical Review 20(1):3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1902325
Hirano, Shigeo, and James M. Snyder, Jr. 2007. The Decline of Minor-Party Voting in the United States. Journal of Politics 69(1):1-16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2007.00490.x
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Peverill Squire. 1995. The Politics of Institutional Choice: Presidential Ballot Access for Minor Parties in the United States. British Journal of Political Science 25(3):419-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400007274
Long, J. Scott. 1997. Regression Models for Categorical and Limited Dependent Variables. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1983. Toward a More Responsible Three-Party System: The Mythology of the Two Party System and the Prospects for Reform. PS 16(4):699-706. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/418745
Lowi, Theodore J. 1999. Toward a Responsible Three-Party System: Plan or Obituary? In The State of the Parties, ed. John C. Green and Daniel M. Shea. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, Inc.
Marquez, Myriam. 1998. Want to live in a True Democracy? Vote for Open Elections. Orlando Sentinel, September 14.
Mazmanian, Daniel A. 1978. Moving Outside or Around the Two-Party System: Minor Parties in Presidential Elections. In Parties and Elections in an Anti-Party Age, ed. Jeff Fishel. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Norrander, Barbara. 1989. Explaining Cross-State Variation in Independent Identification. American Journal of Political Science 33(2):516-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111158
O.Neil, Deborah. 1998. Minor Parties Push for Equal Access to Ballot. St. Petersburg Times, August, 3.
Perez, Robert. 1998. Polling Sites Could Get Crowded. Orlando Sentinel, November 12.
Peterson, Geoff, and J. Mark Wrighton. 1998. Expressions of Distrust: Minor-Party Voting and Cynicism in Government. Political Behavior 20(1):17-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024891016072
Polsby, Nelson W., and Aaron Wildavsky. 1996. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures in American Politics, 9th ed. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Ranney, Austin, and Willmoore Kendall. 1956. Democracy and the American Party System. New York: Harcourt and Brace.
Riker, William H. 1976. The Number of Political Parties: A Reexamination of Duverger's Law. Comparative Politics 9(October):93-106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/421293
Robeck, Bruce W., and James A. Dyer. 1982. Ballot Access Requirements in Congressional Elections. American Politics Research 10(1):31-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8201000102
Roneck, Dennis W. 1992. Learning More from Tobit Coefficients: Extending a Comparative Analysis of Political Protest. American Sociological Review 57(4):503-507. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2096097
Rosenkranz, E. Joshua. 1996. Voter Choice .96: A 50 State Report Card on the Presidential Elections. New York: Brennan Center for Justice at New York University School of Law.
Rosenstone, Steven J., Roy L. Behr, and Edward H. Lazarus. 1996. Minor Parties in America, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rusk, Jerrold G. 1970. The Effect of the Australian Ballot Reform on Split Ticket Voting, 1876-1908. American Political Science Review 76(4):1220-1216. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1958367
Schattschneider, E. E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: a Realist's View of Democracy in America. Hinsdale, IL: The Dryden Press.
Schmidt, David D. 1989. Citizen Lawmakers, the Ballot Initiative Revolution. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Sifry, Micah L. 2002. Spoiling for a Fight: Minor-Party Politics in America. New York: Routledge.
Sommerville, Richard, and Christina Clemenson. 1998. Improving Ballot Access in Florida. Green Party of Florida Fall 1998. http://www.greens.org/s-r/17/17-05.html (November 22, 2007).
Stratmann, Thomas. 2005. Ballot Access Restrictions and Candidate Entry in Elections. European Journal of Political Economy 21(March):59-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2004.05.007
Tamas, Bernard, and Matthew Hindman. 2007. Do State Election Laws Really Hurt Third Parties? Ballot Access, Fusion and Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives. Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago, IL.
Winger, Richard. 1997. Institutional Obstacles to a Multiparty System. In Multiparty Politics in American, eds. Paul S. Herrnson and John C. Green. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
Winger, Richard. 1998a. Florida Commission Backs Abolishing Petitions. Ballot Access News 13(10).
Winger, Richard. 1998b. Florida Voters Wipe Out Mandatory Petitions. Ballot Access News 14(8).
Winger, Richard. 1999. Ballot Access: a Formidable Barrier to Fair Participation. Available at: www.ballot-access.org/winger/fbfp.html (June 10, 2008).
Copyright (c) 2010 Scot Schraufnagel, Kerri Milita
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.