Growing District Partisan Homogeneity and the Decline of the Personal Vote in U.S. House Elections

Authors

  • Richard Born

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2009.30.0.251-274

Abstract

Despite decline in the magnitude of U.S. House members’ personal vote, reelection safety has not been impaired. Oppenheimer’s explanation for this seeming paradox rests upon the growing partisan homogeneity of House districts; i.e., incumbents presumably reduced their level of constituency service knowing that any resulting attrition in their personal vote would be compensated by a more substantial partisan vote. My study uncovers some evidence to back up this explanation. I indeed find that members from safer partisan districts have been perceived by constituents as less engaged in constituency activity and that such activity has declined somewhat over time. The electoral consequences of reduction in constituency engagement, however, seem too small to have been a major cause of the attenuation in the personal vote.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I., Brad Alexander, and Matthew Gunning. 2006. Incumbency, Redistricting, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections. Journal of Politics 68:75-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00371.x

Ansolabehere, Stephen, James M. Snyder, Jr., and Charles Stewart, III. 2000. Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage. American Journal of Political Science 44(January):17-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2669290

Bartels, Larry. 2000. Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science 4:35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2669291

Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N. Katz, and Richard Tucker. 1998. Taking Time Seriously: Time-Series-Cross-Section Analysis with a Binary Dependent Variable. American Journal of Political Science 42:1260-1288. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2991857

Brady, David W., Robert D'Onofrio, and Morris P. Fiorina. 2000. The Nationalization of Electoral Forces Revisited. In Continuity and Change in House Elections, eds. David W. Brady, John F. Cogan, and Morris P. Fiorina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Cain, Bruce, John Ferejohn, and Morris Fiorina. 1987. The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674493285

Canes-Wrone, Brandice, David W. Brady, and John F. Cogan. 2002. Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting. American Political Science Review 96:127-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402004276

Carson, James L., Michael H. Crespin, Charles J. Finocchiaro, and David W. Rohde. 2007. Redistricting and Party Polarization in the U.S. House of Representatives. American Politics Research 35:878-904. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X07304263

Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright. 2009. Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections. In Congress Reconsidered, 9th ed., eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Boston: Little, Brown and Company.

Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 2000. Congress at the Grassroots: Representational Change in the South, 1970-1998. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Some Problems in Studying the Effects of Resource Allocation in Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science 25:543-567. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110818

Fiorina, Morris P. 2005. Keystone Revisited. In Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed., eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Greene, William H. 1998. Gender Economics Courses in Liberal Arts Colleges: Further Results. Journal of Economic Education 29:291-300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220489809595921 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1182919

Greene, William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis, 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Hibbing, John R., and Eric Tiritilli. 2000. Public Disapproval of Congress Can Be Dangerous to Majority Party Candidates: The Case of 1994. In Continuity and Change in House Elections, eds. David W. Brady, John F. Cogan, and Morris P. Fiorina. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Jacobson, Gary C. 2004. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 6th ed. New York: Pearson Longman.

Jones, Charles O. 1981. New Directions in U.S. Congressional Research: A Review Article. Legislative Studies Quarterly 6:455-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439485

Levitt, Steven D., and Catherine D. Wolfram. 1997. Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the U.S. House. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:45-60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440290

Lockerbie, Brad. 1999. The Partisan Component to the Incumbency Advantage: 1956-1996. Political Research Quarterly 52:631-646. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200308 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/449152

Mann, Thomas E. 2006. Polarizing the House: How Much Does Gerrymandering Matter? In Red and Blue Nation?: Characteristics and Causes of America's Polarized Politics, Vol. 1, eds. Pietro S. Nivola and David W. Brady. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

McDermott, Monika L., and David R. Jones. 2003. Do Public Evaluations of Congress Matter? American Politics Research 31:155-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X02250291

Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 2005. Deep Red and Blue Congressional Districts: The Causes and Consequences of Declining Party Competitiveness. In Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed., eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Rhine, Sherrie L.W., William H. Greene, and Maude Toussaint-Comeau. 2006. The Importance of Check-Cashing Businesses to the Unbanked: Racial/Ethnic Differences. Review of Economics and Statistics 88:146-157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/rest.2006.88.1.146 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003465306775565846

Rivers, Douglas, and Morris P. Fiorina. 1989. Constituency Service, Reputation, and the Incumbency Advantage. In Home Style and Washington Work: Studies of Congressional Politics, eds. Morris P. Fiorina and David W. Rohde. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

Stonecash, Jeffrey M., Mark D. Brewer, and Mack D. Mariani. 2003. Diverging Parties: Social Change, Realignment, and Party Polarization. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790652

White, Nancy E., and Amy M. Wolaver. 2003. Occupation Choice, Information, and Migration. Review of Regional Studies 33:142-163.

Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Steven J. Rosenstone. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Downloads

Published

2009-11-01

Issue

Vol. 30: Fall 2009

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.