Partisan "New Media" and Opinion Change, 2002-2004

Authors

  • David A. Jones

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2009.30.0.1-16

Abstract

When gathering news about public affairs, citizens may now choose from a broader selection of political “new media” outlets that provide programming closely aligned with their opinions and worldviews. This study explores whether partisan opinion-based communication such as that broadcast on talk radio influence the views of their audiences. It finds that between 2002 and 2004 Democrats who regularly listened to political talk radio developed distinctly cooler feelings toward President Bush and other high-profile GOP leaders. Although these findings provide no decisive proof of media effects, they do raise questions about partisan new media’s contributions to polarization in the electorate at large. As more partisan outlets become available, existing political cleavages may widen.

References

Abramowitz, Alan, and Kyle Saunders. 2005. Why Can.t We All Just Get Along? The Reality of a Polarized America. The Forum (3)2: Article 1.

Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Shanto Iyengar. 1996. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink & Polarize the Electorate. New York: Free Press.

Barker, David C. 1999. Rushed Decisions: Political Talk Radio and Vote Choice, 1994-96. Journal of Politics 61(2):527-539. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647515

Barker, David C. 2002. Rushed to Judgment: Talk Radio, Persuasion, and American Political Behavior. New York: Columbia University Press.

Barker, David, and Kathleen Knight. 2000. Political Talk Radio and Public Opinion. Public Opinion Quarterly 64:149-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/317760

Bartels, Larry. 1993. Messages Received: The Political Impact of Media Exposure. American Political Science Review 87:267-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2939040

Bennett, Stephen Earl. 2002. Predicting Americans. Exposure to Political Talk Radio in 1996, 1998 and 2000. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 7(1):9-22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X0200700102 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X02007001002 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/108118002129172421

Bennett, W. Lance. 2003. Operation Perfect Storm: The Press and the Iraq War. Political Communication Report 13(3).

Bolce, Louis, Gerald De Maio, and Douglas Muzzio. 1996. Dial-In Democracy: Talk Radio and the 1994 Election. Political Science Quarterly 111(3):457-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151971

Cappella, Joseph N., Joseph Turow, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 1996. Call-In Political Talk Radio: Background, Content, Audiences, Portrayal in the Mainstream Media. Philadelphia, PA: The Annenberg Public Policy Center.

Chaiken, Shelly. 1980. Heuristic Versus Systemic Information Processing and the Use of Source Versus Message Cues in Persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39:752-766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752

Davis, Richard, and Diana Owen. 1998. New Media and American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.

Fiorina, Morris P. 2005. Culture War? The Myth of a Polarized America. New York: Pearson Longman.

Gerbner, George, Larry Gross, Michael Morgan, and Nancy Signorielli. 1982. Charting the Mainstream: Television.s Contributions to Political Orientations. Journal of Communication 3(3):10-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb00500.x

Groseclose, Tim, and Jeffrey Milyo. 2005. A Measure of Media Bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics 120(4):1191-1237. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/003355305775097542

Herbst, Susan. 1995. On Electronic Public Space: Talk Shows in Theoretical Perspective. Political Communication 12(3):263-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584609.1995.9963073

Hofstetter, C. Richard. 1996. Situational Involvement and Political Mobilization: Political Talk Radio and Political Action. Presented at the annual meeting of the Mid-west Political Science Association, April 18-20, Chicago.

Hofstetter, C. Richard and David Barker, with James T. Smith, Gina M. Zari, and Thomas A. Ingrassia. 1999. Information, Misinformation, and Political Talk Radio. Political Research Quarterly 52:353-369. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/449222 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200205

Holbert, R. Lance. 2004. Political Talk Radio, Perceived Fairness, and the Establishment of President George W. Bush.s Political Legitimacy. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9(3):12-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X04265976

Hollander, Barry A. 1996. Talk Radio: Predictors of Use and Effects on Attitudes about Government. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 73:102-113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769909607300110

Huckfeldt, Robert, Paul Allen Beck, Russell J. Dalton, and Jeffrey Levine. 1995. Political Environments, Cohesive Social Groups, and the Communication of Public Opinion. American Journal of Political Science 30(4):1025-1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111668

Isenberg, Daniel J. 1986. Group Polarization: A Critical Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(6):1141-1151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1141

Iyengar, Shanto. 1991. Is Anyone Responsible: How Television Frames Political Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226388533.001.0001

Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder. 1989. News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Jamieson, Kathleen Hall, Joseph N. Cappella, and Joseph Turow. 1996. Limbaugh: The Fusion of Party Leader and Partisan Mass Medium. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, August.

Jones, David A. 2001. The Polarizing Effect of New Media Messages. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 14(2):158-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/14.2.158

Jones, David A. 2004. Why Americans Don.t Trust the Media: A Preliminary Analysis. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 9(2):60-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X04263461

Kuklinski, James H., Paul J. Quirk, David Scheider, and Robert F. Rich. 1997. Misinformation and the Currency of Citizenship. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 10-12.

Kull, Steven, Clay Ramsay, and Evan Lewis 2003. Misperceptions, the Media and the Iraq War. Political Science Quarterly 118(4):569-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.1538-165X.2003.tb00406.x

Lee, Gangheong, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2001. The Effects of Political Talk Radio on Political Attitude Formation: Exposure Versus Knowledge. Political Communication 18:369-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600152647092

Mendelsohn, Matthew, and Richard Nadeau. 1996. The Magnification and Minimization of Social Cleavages by the Broadcast and Narrowcast News Media. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 8(4):374-389. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/8.4.374

Mondak, Jeffery J. 1993. Public Opinion and Heuristic Processing of Source Cues. Political Behavior 15(2):167-192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00993852

Morris, Jonathan S. 2005. The Fox News Factor. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 10(3):56-79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X05279264

Mutz, Diana, and Paul S. Martin. 2001. Facilitating Communication Across Lines of Political Difference: The Role of the Mass Media. American Political Science Review 95(1):97-114.

Myers, David G., and Helmut Lamm. 1975. The Polarizing Effect of Group Discussion. American Scientist 63(May-June):297-303.

Neuman, W. Russell. 1996. Political Communication Infrastructure. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 546:9-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0002716296546001002

Niven, David. 1999. Partisan Bias in the Media? A New Test. Social Science Quarterly 80(4):847-858.

Owen, Diana. 1997. Talk Radio and Evaluations of President Clinton. Political Communication 14:333-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846097199362

Owen, Diana. 2000. Popular Politics and the Clinton/Lewinsky Affair: The Implications of Leadership. Political Psychology 21(1):161-177. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00182

Pan, Zhongdang, and Gerald M. Kosicki. 1997. Talk Radio Exposure as an Opinion Activity. Political Communication 14:371-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/105846097199380

Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Out of Order. New York: Vintage.

Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. 2004. News Audiences Increasingly Politicized: Online News Audiences Larger, More Diverse. Available online at http://people-press.org/reports.

Pfau, Michael, Patricia Moy, R. Lance Holbert, Erin Szabo, WaiKuo Lin, and Weiwu Zhang. 1998. The Influence of Political Talk Radio on Confidence in Democratic Institutions. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 75:730-745. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/107769909807500408

Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy: How Media Choice Increases In-equality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. New York: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139878425

Schiffer, Adam J. 2006. Assessing Partisan Bias in Political News: The Case(s) of Local Senate Election Coverage. Political Communication 23(1):23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600500476981

Shah, Dhavan V., Mark D. Watts, David Domke, David P. Fan, and Michael Fibison. 1999. News Coverage, Economic Cues, and the Public.s Presidential Preferences, 1984-1996. Journal of Politics 61(4):914-943. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647548

Squires, Catherine R. 2000. Black Talk Radio: Defining Community Needs and Identity. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 5(2):73-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/108118000569119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X00005002006

West, Darrell M. 2001. The Rise and Fall of the Media Establishment. New York: St. Martin's. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-07405-8

Yanovitzky, Itzhak, and Joseph N. Cappella. 2001. Effect of Call-In Political Talk Radio Shows on Their Audiences: Evidence from a Multi-Wave Panel Analysis. Inter-national Journal of Public Opinion Research 13:377-397. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijpor/13.4.377

Zaller, John. 1996. The Myth of Massive Media Impact Revived: New Support for a Discredited Idea. In Political Persuasion and Attitude Change, eds. Diana C. Mutz, Paul M. Sniderman, and Richard A. Brody.

Downloads

Published

2009-04-01

Issue

Vol. 30: Spring 2009

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.