Presidential Campaigning during Midterm Elections

Authors

  • Matthew Eshbaugh-Soha
  • Sean Nicholson-Crotty

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2009.30.0.35-50

Abstract

Previous studies have approached presidential campaigning at midterm from very different theoretical vantages. One component of the literature suggests that president’s campaign at midterm primarily to aid individual candidates and improve congressional makeup, while another argues that all presidential travel is part of the permanent campaign that presidents undertake in order to further personal reelection goals. Interestingly, these approaches, and the factors that each suggests influence presidential decisions, have remained effectively insulated from one another in empirical studies of presidential travel and campaigning. This study combines these complimentary theoretical stories to provide a more comprehensive model of presidential campaigning in midterm elections. We test this model in an analysis of midterm campaign stops between 1994 and 2006 and show a mix of factors from both literatures best explain presidential campaigning at midterm.

References

Allen, Mike. 2002. For Bush, the Stump Goes On: 8th Trip to Iowa Highlights Focus on Key States for 2002, .04. The Washington Post, September 17, p. A04.

Alt, James, David Lassen, David Dreyer, and David Skilling. 2002. Fiscal Transparency, Gubernatorial Approval, and the Scale of Government: Evidence from the States. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:230-251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200302

Anderson, Jennifer, and Adam Newmark. 2002. A Dynamic Model of U.S. Senator Approval. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:251-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200306

Balz, Dan. 2006. Campaigner in Chief has Limited Reach: An Unpopular President voids Key Races. The Washington Post, November 1, p. A1.

Barth, Jay, and Margaret Ferguson. 2002. American Governors and Their Constituents: The Relationship Between Gubernatorial Personality and Public Approval. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:268-283. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200304

Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-1993. American Journal of Political Science 42(1):327-348. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2991759

Beyle, Thad, Richard G. Niemi, and Lee Sigelman. 2002. Gubernatorial, Senatorial, and State-level Presidential Job Approval: The U.S. Officials Job Approval Ratings (JAR) Collection. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2(Fall):215-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200301

Blumenthal, Sidney. 1980. The Permanent Campaign: Inside the World of Elite Political Operatives. Boston: Beacon Press.

Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.

Charnock, Emily Jane, James A. McCann, and Kathryn Dunn Tenpas. 2006. Goin. Mobile: Assessing First-term Presidential Travel from Eisenhower to George W. Bush. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.

Cohen, Jeffrey E., Michael A. Krassa, and John A. Hamman. 1991. The Impact of Presidential Campaigning on Midterm U.S. Senate Elections. American Political Science Review 85(March):165-178. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962883

Doherty, Brendan J. 2007a. The Politics of the Permanent Campaign: Presidential Travel, Fundraising, and the Electoral College, 1977-2004. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.

Doherty, Brendan J. 2007b. The Politics of the Permanent Campaign: Presidential Travel, and the Electoral College, 1977-2004. Presidential Studies Quarterly 37(December):749-773. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2007.02623.x

Dometrius, Nelson. 2002. Gubernatorial Approval and Administrative Influence. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2:251-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153244000200200303

Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. Cambridge University Press.

Fiorina, Morris P. 1977. The Case of the Vanishing Marginals: The Bureaucracy Did It. American Political Science Review 71:177-181. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1956961 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400259376

Herrnson, Paul S., and Irwin L. Morris. 2007. Presidential Campaigning in the 2002 Congressional Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:629-648. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298007782398468

Hoddie, Matthew, and Stephen R. Routh. 2004. Predicting Presidential Presence: Explaining Presidential Midterm Elections Campaign Behavior. Political Research Quarterly 57(June):257-265. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290405700207 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3219869

Jacobson, Gary, Samuel Kernell, and Jeffrey Lazarus. 2004. Assessing the President's Role As Party Agent in Congressional Elections: The Case of Bill Clinton in 2000. Legislative Studies Quarterly 29(May):159-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298004X201131

Keele, Luke J., Brian J. Fogarty, and James A. Stimson. 2004. Presidential Campaigning in the 2002 Congressional Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics 37(October):827-832. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096504045226

Light, Paul C. 1999. The President's Agenda: Domestic Policy Choice from Kennedy to Clinton. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.

Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals. Polity 6:295-317. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3233931

Milbank, Dana. 2002. The Virtual Candidate: Bush Could Win or Lose for Next 2 Years on Nov. 5. The Washington Post, November 2, p. A01.

Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents. New York: The Free Press.

Sigelman, Lee, and Carol K. Sigelman. 1981. Presidential Leadership of Public Opinion: From. Benevolent Leader. to Kiss of Death? Experimental Study of Politics 7:1-22.

Tufte, Edward R. 1975. Determinants of the Outcome of Midterm Congressional Elections. American Political Science Review 95(September):812-826. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1958391

Wattenberg, Martin P. 1998. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1996. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Published

2009-04-01

Issue

Vol. 30: Spring 2009

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.