Presidential Pseudo-Events and the Media Coverage They Receive

Authors

  • Jeff Peake
  • Amanda Jo Parks

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.85-108

Abstract

American presidents routinely use pseudo-events in their attempts to generate positive news coverage and build a favorable image in the press. Despite their prevalence, we know little about how pseudo-events are covered by the American press. We content analyze front-page coverage of seven White House events during 2006 and early 2007 in 96 U.S. newspapers. We compare the amount and tone of coverage given each event, as well as the framing provided by headlines and lead paragraphs. Moreover, comparisons across newspapers suggest that newspapers slant to their coverage of presidential pseudo-events, which correlates with endorsement behavior and the political leanings of its potential market. Our results suggest that the coverage of presidential pseudo-events is shaped by the national political and policy context as well as the local context of the newspaper, thus limiting the ability of the White House to positively influence media coverage. However, effective staging and symbolism can result in positive coverage, even when the president faces difficult political circumstances.

References

Althaus, Scott, L., Jill A. Edy, Patricia F. Phalen. 2001. Using Substitutes for Full-Text News Stories in Content Analysis: Which Text Is Best? American Journal of Political Science 45(3):707-723. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2669247

Barrett, Andrew W., and Barrington, Lowell W. 2005. Bias in Newspaper Photograph Selection. Political Research Quarterly 58(4):609-618. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3595646 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290505800408

Barrett, Andrew W., and Jeffrey S. Peake. 2007. When the President Comes to Town: Examining Local Newspaper Coverage of Domestic Presidential Travel. American Politics Research 35(1):3-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X06292816

Bennett, W. Lance. 1990. Toward a Theory of Press-State Relations in the United States. Journal of Communication 40:103-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1990.tb02265.x

Bennett, W. Lance. 2005. News: The Politics of Illusion, 7th ed. New York: Longman.

Bogart, Leo. 1989. Press and Public: Who Reads What, When, Where, and Why in American Newspapers, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Boorstin, Daniel. 1987. The Image: A Guide to Pseudo-Events in America, 25th anniversary ed. New York: Atheneum.

Burnier, DeLysa. 1994. Constructing Political Reality: Language, Symbols, and Meaning in Politics. Political Research Quarterly 47(1):239-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299404700113

Cohen, Jeffrey E., and Richard J. Powell. 2005. Building Presidential Support From the Grassroots Up: The Impact of Presidential Travel on State-Level Approval. Presidential Studies Quarterly 35(1):11-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2004.00233.x

Cook, Corey. 2002. The Permanence of the .Permanent Campaign.: George W. Bush's Public Presidency. Presidential Studies Quarterly 32(3):753-764. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0360491802238707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0360-4918.2002.00246.x

Edelman, Murray. 1967. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana-Champaign: University of Illinois Press.

Edelman, Murray. 1988. Constructing the Political Spectacle. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Edwards, George C. 2003. On Deaf Ears: The Limits of the Bully Pulpit. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Edwards, George C., III. 2007. Governing by Campaigning: The Politics of the Bush Presidency. New York: Pearson, Longman.

Entman, Robert M. 2003. Cascading Activation: Contesting the White House's Frame after 9/11. Political Communication 20:15-532. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10584600390244176

Eshbaugh-Soha, Matthew, and Jeffrey S. Peake. 2006. .Going Local. to Reform Social Security. Presidential Studies Quarterly 36(4):689-704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2006.02575.x

Gentzkow, Matthew, and Jesse M. Shapiro. 2006. Media Bias and Reputation. Journal of Political Economy 114(2):280-316. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/499414

Graber, Doris A. 2006. Mass Media and American Politics, 7th ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Groeling, Tim, and Samuel Kernell. 1998. Is Network News Coverage of the President Biased? Journal of Politics 60(4):1063-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647731

Halin, Daniel C. 1984. The Media, the War in Vietnam, and Political Support: A Critique of the Thesis of an Oppositional Media. Journal of Politics 46(1):2-24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2130432

Hamilton, James. 2004. All the News That's Fit to Sell: How the Market Transforms Information Into News. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400841417

Hinckley, Barbara. 1990. The Symbolic Presidency: How Presidents Portray Themselves. New York: Routledge.

Iyengar, Shanto and Donald Kinder. 1987. News that Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kahn, Kim Fridkin and Patrick J. Kenney. 2002. The Slant of the News: How Editorial Endorsements Influence Campaign Coverage and Citizens. Views of Candidates. American Political Science Review 96(2):381-394. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055402000230

Kaniss, Phyllis. 1991. Making Local News. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Kernell, Samuel. 1997. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership, 3rd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Kumar, Matha Joynt. 2007. Managing the President's Message: the White House Communications Operation. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Lipmann, Walter. 1922. Public Opinion. New York: Free Press.

Mondak, Jeffrey. 1995. Nothing to Read: Newspapers and Elections in a Social Experiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Page, Benjamin I. 1996. Who Deliberates? Mass Media in Modern Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Patterson, Thomas E. 1996. Bad News, Period. PS: Political Science and Politics 29(1): 17-20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096500043997 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/420184

Ragsdale, Lyn. 1984. The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking, 1949-1980. American Political Science Review 78:971-984. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1955802

Shaw, Daron R. and Bartholomew H. Sparrow. 1999. From the Inner Ring Out: News Congruence, Cue-Taking, and Campaign Coverage. Political Research Quarterly 52:323-351. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/449221 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299905200204

Underwood, Douglas. 1993. When MBAs Rule the Newsrooms: How the Markets and Managers are Reshaping Today's Media. New York: Columbia University Press.

Waterman, Richard W., Robert Wright, and Gilbert St. Clair. 1999. The Image-is-Every-thing Presidency. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.

Welch, Reed L. 2000. Is Anybody Watching? The Audience for Televised Presidential Addresses. Congress and the Presidency 27:41-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07343460009507775

Young, Gary and William B. Perkins. 2005. Presidential Rhetoric, the Public Agenda, and the End of Presidential Television's. Golden Age. Journal of Politics 67: 1190-1205. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2508.2005.00356.x

Downloads

Published

2008-07-01

Issue

Vol. 29: Summer 2008

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.