Multiple Referral and U.S. House Legislative Success in the 1990s

Authors

  • Glen Krutz
  • Courtney Cullison

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2008.29.0.65-81

Abstract

We examine the impact of multiple referral on legislative processing in the U.S. House of Representatives from 1991-98. Previous literature leaves off with the 1980s, but party control of the House changed in the 1990s and with it, came a new approach to multiple referral. Did this change alter the impact of multiple referral status on bill progression? In the main, our analysis confirms certain previous findings, while adding some interesting new twists. While multiple referral hurts a bill’s chances of success in some stages of statute-making (committee passage, floor passage), a finding consistent with the literature, we find that it provides a boost to chances of receiving committee attention in the first place. Moreover, we find that the hit that multiply referred bills take in committee and on the floor is much greater than suggested previously. Separate analyses conducted before and after the Republican reforms of 1995 reveal distinct differences. For example, in the Re-publican-controlled environment from 1995-1998, multiple referral bills were slightly more likely to see the House floor, whereas they were less likely to make it in the Democratic House from 1991-94.

References

Baughman, John. 2006. Common Ground: Committee Politics in the U.S. House of Representatives. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Browne, William P. 1998. Groups, Interests, and U.S. Public Policy. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

Congressional Information Service, Inc. 2003. Web searches conducted in October and November, 2003. CIS Congressional Universe: Bills. http://web.lexis-nexis.com/ congcomp.

Davidson, Roger H., Walter J. Oleszek, and Thomas Kephart. 1988. One Bill, Many Committees: Multiple Referrals in the U.S. House of Representatives. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13(1):3-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439942

King, David C. 1997. Turf Wars: How Congressional Committees Claim Jurisdiction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226436265.001.0001

Oleszek, Walter, 1996. Congressional Procedures and the Policy Process, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Rieselbach, Leroy N. 1994. Congressional Reform: The Changing Modern Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Schickler, Eric. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Sinclair, Barbara. Unorthodox Lawmaking. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Smith, Steven S. 1989. Call to Order: Floor Politics in the House and Senate. Washington, DC: Brookings.

Smith, Steven S., and Christopher J. Deering. 1990. Committees in Congress, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Stanley, Harold W., and Richard G. Niemi. 1994. Vital Statistics on American Politics, 4th ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Young, Garry, and Joseph Cooper. 1993. Multiple Referral and the Transformation of House Decision Making. Pp. 211-234 in Congress Reconsidered, 5th ed., eds., Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.

Downloads

Published

2008-04-01

Issue

Vol. 29: Spring 2008

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.