Incumbent Failure and Partisan Strength: An Explanation of the Emergence and Support of Major Third Party Presidential Candidates in the United States
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2007.28.0.97-117Abstract
A strong disapproval among the electorate of both major party challengers is one common explanation for the periodic emergence of major third party presidential candidates in the United States. Simply put, if neither candidate is acceptable, then another candidate will find support among a large portion of the voters. However, this is not necessarily the case. Because modern third party candidates are political entrepreneurs, these candidates will look for fragmentation in the party coalitions and exploit them. Using data from the American National Elections Study, this article will disaggregate the data on feelings about the two major party candidates and who supports them. In doing so, it finds third party candidates tend to emerge when the incumbent president is politically weak and unpopular among both the nation as a whole and their party in particular, regardless of the standing of the other major party challenger. It also finds the idea that people turn to third party candidates after rejecting the two major party candidates is incorrect. Rather, people turn to a third party candidate only if they are disaffected with their party’s nominee. Voters who are unsatisfied with their own party’s candidate would rather look for another alternative and support a third party candidate than vote for the opposition party. This indicates partisanship among the electorate has been stronger since 1968 then previously believed.References
Aldrich, John H., and Nelson, Forrest D. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Newberry Park, NJ: Sage Publications. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781412984744
Atkeson, Lonna Rae. 1998. Divisive Primaries and General Election Outcomes: Another Look at Presidential Campaigns. American Journal of Political Science 42:257-274. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2991755
Bisnow, Mark. 1983. Diary of a Dark Horse: The 1980 Anderson Presidential Campaign. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Blackman, Paul H. 1976. Third Party President? An Analysis of State Election Laws. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation.
Broder, David. 1980. The Pursuit of the Presidency 1980. New York: Berkley Books.
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Election and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
Campbell, James E. 2000. The American Campaign: U.S. Presidential Campaigns and the National Vote. College Station: Texas A&M University Press.
Carter, Dan T. 1995. The Politics of Rage: George Wallace, the Origins of the New Conservativism, and the Transformation of American Politics. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Chressanthis, George A. and Stephen D. Shaffer. 1993. Major Party Failure and Third Party Voting in Presidential Elections, 1976-1988. Social Science Quarterly 74:264-273.
Cook, Rhodes. 1988. Third Party Impact is Small, But It Could Be Felt This Fall. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 2485-2486.
Disch, Lisa J. 2002. The Tyranny of the Two Party System. New York: Columbia University Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
Gallup, George, Jr. 1993. The Gallup Poll: Public Opinion '92. Wilmington, DE: Scholarly Resources.
Gold, Howard J. 1995. Third Party Voting in Presidential Elections: A Study of Perot, Anderson, and Wallace. Political Research Quarterly 48:741-750. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299504800405 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448973
Huckshorn, Robert J. 1980. Political Parties in America. North Sciuate, MA: Duxbury Press.
Israel, Fred L. 1997. Student's Atlas of American Presidential Elections 1789-1996. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
Key, V.O. 1946. Political Parties and Pressure Groups. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell Company.
Lengle, James, and Diana Owen. 1995. Divisive Nominating Mechanisms and Democratic Party Electoral Prospects. Journal of Politics 57:370-385. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960311
Lesher, Stephen. 1994. George Wallace: American Populist. Reading, MA: William Patrick.
Mayer, Jeremy, and Clyde Wilcox. 2001. Understanding Perot's Plummet. Pp. 163-172 in Ross for Boss, ed. Ted G. Jelen. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Mazmanian, Daniel A. 1974. Third Parties in Presidential Elections. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Morton, Rebecca B. 2006. Analyzing Elections. New York: W.W. Norton.
Nordin, Kenneth D. 2001. The Television Candidate: H. Ross Perot's 1992 and 1996 Presidential Races. Pp. 15-34 in Ross for Boss, ed. Ted G. Jelen. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Paolantonio, S.A. 1992. Buchanan's Impact on Bush May Linger. Philadelphia Enquirer. 22 March, p. 3.
Rapoport, Robert B., and Walter J. Stone. 2006. Three's a Crowd: The Dynamic of Third Parties, Ross Perot, and Republican Resurgence. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Rosenstone, Steven J. et al. 1996. Third Parties in America: Citizens Response to Major Party Failure. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Southwell, Priscilla L., and Marcy J. Everest. 1998. The Electoral Consequences of Alienation: Nonvoting and Protest Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election. Social Science Journal 35:43-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0362-3319(98)90058-1
Skowronek, Stephen. 1997. The Politics Presidents Make. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Steger, Wayne P. 2003. Presidential Renomination Challengers in the 20th Century. Presidential Studies Quarterly 33:827-852. http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.0360-4918.2003.00086.x
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States. Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution.
Wattenberg, Martin. 1994. The Decline of American Political Parties 1952-1992. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Williams, et al. v. Rhodes, Governor of Ohio. 393 U.S. 23 (1968).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
