Virginia: The Triumph of Experience Over Hope
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2005.26.0.245-265Abstract
Each fall, the nation’s newspapers’ Sunday comic sections include a classic representation of unfailing optimism confronting harsh reality. Lucy Van Pelt, the crabby protagonist of “Peanuts” fame, once again offers the eternally hopeful Charlie Brown the opportunity to relish the thrill of place-kicking a football into the crisp autumn air. Though he knows he’s been cruelly tricked before, each year Charlie Brown finally succumbs to the possibility that this will finally be his year. As he races toward the ball, Lucy once again snatches it off the ground, leaving our hero flat on his back, ruing his gullibility. Every four years, Virginia’s Democrats approach the Presidential election with much the same script. With varying degrees of encouragement from presidential candidates and national party leaders, the only question confronting them seems to be how close they can get to the ball before it is snatched away. In 2004, the ball stayed on the ground longer than usual, but ultimately Virginia once again cast its electoral votes for the Republican ticket in the national election. President George W. Bush defeated Senator John F. Kerry by a margin of 53 to 45 percent, almost identical to the 2000 election results despite a significant expenditure of resources on behalf of Kerry.References
Clines, Francis X. 2001. G.O.P. Chairman Under Republican Fire Back Home. New York Times, March 23.
Dellinger, Paul. 2004. Bush, Kerry Offices, Signs Sprouting Up Across NRV. Roanoke Times & World News, September 9.
Edds, Margaret. 2004. Why Kerry is Courting Virginia. Hampton Roads The Virginian-Pilot, June 6.
Edsall, Thomas, and James Grimaldi. 2004. On Nov. 2, GOP Got More Bang For Its Billions, Analysis Shows. Washington Post, December 30.
Eisman, Dale. 2004. VAís Turn Comes Today / Kerry Set on Victory, But Clark, Edwards Could Spring Upset. Hampton Roads The Virginian-Pilot, February 10.
Fiske, Warren. 2004a. Warner Promises Kerry Victory in Virginia. Hampton Roads The Virginian-Pilot, July 30.
Fiske, Warren. 2004b. Kerry Edges Away From ìAir Battleî in Virginia. Hampton Roads The Virginian-Pilot, September 10.
Geroux, Bill. 2004. Kerry Arrives in Norfolk; Navy Vet Feels At Home. Richmond Times-Dispatch, July 27.
Hoffman, Roy F. 2004. ìKerry, War Heroî Is a Myth. Richmond Times-Dispatch, September 19.
Lewis, Bob. 2004. Kerry, Bush Make Hard Sells For Virginiaís Vetsí Votes. Associated Press State and Local Wire, September 20.
Marshall, Will. 2004. Heartland Strategy. Blueprint: The New Democrat Magazine, December 13.
McGlennon, John. 2002. Virginia: The Parties Agree Itís Out of Play. In The 2000 Presidential Election in the South: Partisanship and Southern Party Systems in the 21st Century, eds. Robert P. Steed and Laurence W. Moreland. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Mercer, Marsha. 2004. Kerry Holiday Visit to Virginia Begins Parade of Speculation. Richmond Times-Dispatch, June 6.
Polsby, Nelson, and Aaron Wildavsky. 2004, 11th ed. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures of American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Sabato, Larry. 2001. 2001 Gubernatorial Election in Virginia: The Return of Two-Party Competition. University of Virginia Center for Governmental Studies.
Schapiro, Jeff. 2004. Southern Sweep: Kerry Wins Virginia, Tennessee; Clark Drops Out; Virginia Reprises Role of 2000 in Sealing Kerry's Nomination. Richmond Times-Dispatch, February 11.
Sluss, Michael. 2004. Kerry Campaign Workers Pulled From Virginia. Roanoke Times & World News, October 5.
Stallsmith, Pamela. 2004. Parties Use Net to Rally Support. Richmond Times-Dispatch, September 6.
State Board of Elections, Commonwealth of Virginia. 2005a. Statewide Results: Demo-
State Board of Elections, Commonwealth of Virginia. 2005b. November 2nd General Election Official Results (accessed at http://www.sbe.virginia.gov/web_docs/Election/Results/2004/Nov2004/).
United States Census Bureau. 2004. State Rankings: Persons 25 Years and Older with a Bachelorís Degree or Higher (accessed at http://www.census.gov/statab/ranks/rank19.html).
Whitley, Tyler. 2004a. Virginia is Not Too Close to Call. Richmond Times-Dispatch, March 4.
Whitley, Tyler. 2004b. Virginia TV Spots for Kerry a New Spin: Republicans Say Efforts to Classify State a Battleground Could Backfire. Richmond Times-Dispatch, May 29.
Whitley, Tyler. 2004c. Clark First Democrat to Air TV Ad in Virginia. Richmond Times-Dispatch, January 7.
Whitley, Tyler. 2004d. Kerry TV Ad in VA Stresses His Service. Richmond Times-Dispatch, June 3.
Whitley, Tyler. 2004e. Anti-Kerry Group Has Local Ties: Swift Boat Veterans Enlist Aid Of Richmond GOP Operative For Their TV Ad Campaign. Richmond Times-Dispatch, August 19.
Whitley, Tyler. 2004f. Kerryís Ads Will Bypass Virginia. Richmond Times-Dispatch, September 10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.