The Structure of Party Competition in the South: The Case of Florida
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2004.25.0.41-65Abstract
Although Florida has evolved from a one-party system into an intensely competitive two-party system, many studies of the state’s partisan and electoral politics continue to stress the importance of candidate-centered voting and weak party attachments, characteristics of a dealigned party system. This paper argues that such conclusions, based primarily on studies that employ individual-level data, are misleading. The paper examines the structure of the party vote across different political offices utilizing aggregate-level election returns at the county level through principal components factor analysis. Findings indicate that the New Deal vote alignment was disrupted at the presidential level in the 1960s, and a new stable alignment emerged in 1972. Consistent with the notion of a “top-down” or “creeping” realignment, the Post-New Deal alignment penetrated elections for U.S. Senate and governor from 1986 onwards, but came to structure cabinet office elections more gradually, with a culmination of this realignment in the 1990s. Overall, the paper argues that studies relying exclusively on individual-level data to examine Florida’s partisan and electoral politics have overlooked a great deal of structure and stability underlying the vote in this politically important state.References
Abramowitz, Alan I, and Kyle L. Saunders. 1998. Ideological Realignment in the U.S. Electorate. Journal of Politics 60:634-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647642
Abramowitz, Alan I., Susan H. Allen, H. Gibbs Knotts, and Kyle L. Saunders. 2002. Racial Attitudes, Ideology, and the Rise of Republican Identification among Southern Whites, 1982-2000. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA.
Aistrup, Joseph. A. 1996. The Southern Strategy Revisited: Republican Top-Down Advancement in the South. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Aistrup, Joseph. A. 2004. Top Down and Bottom-up Party Voting in the South: A View from the Voting Booth. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Southern Political Science Association, New Orleans, LA.
Aldrich, John H. 2000. Southern Politics in State and Nation. Journal of Politics 62:643-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00028
Aldrich, John H. and Richard G. Niemi. 1996. The Sixth American Party System: Electoral Change, 1952-1992. In Broken Contract? Changing Relationships Between Americans and Their Government, ed. Stephen Craig. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Bartels, Larry M. 1998. Electoral Continuity and Change, 1868-1996. Electoral Studies 17:301-326. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0261-3794(98)00035-3
Bartels, Larry M. 2000. Partisanship and Voting Behavior, 1952-1996. American Journal of Political Science 44:35-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2669291
Beachler, Donald W. 1999. The Clinton Breakthrough? Presidential Politics in Florida. Political Chronicle 11:1-12.
Beck, Paul Allen. 1977. Partisan Dealignment in the Postwar South. American Political Science Review 71:477-498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400267403 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1978343
Beck, Paul Allen. 1982. Realignment Begins? The Republican Surge in Florida. American Politics Quarterly 10:279-304. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004478082010004002
Beck, Paul Allen. 1984. The Dealignment Era in America. In Electoral Change in Advanced Industrialized Democracies, eds. Russell J. Dalton, Scott C. Flanagan, and Paul Allen Beck. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Beck, Paul Allen. 1988. Incomplete Realignment: The Reagan Legacy for Parties and Elections. In The Reagan Legacy, ed. Charles O. Jones. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Beck, Paul Allen. 1992. Party Realignment in America: The View from the States. In Party Realignment and State Politics, ed. Maureen Moakley. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 1992. The Vital South. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674734579
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Bullock, Charles S., III. 1988a. Creeping Realignment in the South. In The South's New Politics: Realignment and Dealignment, eds. Robert H. Swansbrough, and David M. Brodsky. Colombia: University of South Carolina Press.
Bullock, Charles S., III. 1988b. Regional Realignment from an Officeholding Perspective. Journal of Politics 50:553-574. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131458
Burnham, Walter Dean. 1970. Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of American Politics. New York: W.W. Norton.
Campbell, Angus. 1966. A Classification of Presidential Elections. In Elections and the Political Order, eds. Angus Campbell, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller, and Donald E. Stokes. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Carmines, Edward G., and Harold W. Stanley. 1990. Ideological Realignment in the Contemporary South: Where Have all the Conservatives Gone? In The Disappearing South: Studies in Regional Change and Continuity, eds. Robert P. Steed, Laurence W. Moreland, and Tod A. Baker. Tuscaloosa: University of Alabama Press.
Carmines, Edward G., and James A. Stimson. 1989. Issue Evolution, Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Carver, Joan, and Tom Fiedler. 1999. Florida: A Volatile National Microcosm. In Southern Politics in the 1990s, ed. Alexander P. Lamis. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Dauer, Manning J. 1972. Florida: The Different State. In The Changing Politics of the South, ed. William C. Havard. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Dye, Thomas. 1998. Politics in Florida. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Erikson, Robert S., Gerald C. Wright, and John P. McIver. 1993. Statehouse Democracy: Public Opinion and Policy in the American States. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Gimpel, James. 1996. National Elections and the Autonomy of American State Party Systems. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Glaser, James M. 1996. Race, Campaign Politics, and the Realignment in the South. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hoffman, Donna R. 2000. Realignment Theory in Societal Perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Jacobson, Gary C. 1990. The Electoral Origins of Divided Government: Competition in U.S. House Elections, 1946-1988. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Keith, Bruce E., David B. Magleby, Candice J. Nelson, Elizabeth Orr, Mark C. Westyle, and Raymond E. Wolfinger. 1992. The Myth of the Independent Voter. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1956. American State Politics. New York: Knopf.
Key, V.O., Jr. 1955. A Theory of Critical Elections. Journal of Politics 17:3-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2126401
Key, V.O., Jr. 1959. Secular Realignment and the Party System. Journal of Politics 21: 198-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2127162
Ladd, Everett Carll. 1985. On Mandates, Realignments, and the 1984 Presidential Election. Political Science Quarterly 100:1-25. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2150858
Ladd, Everett Carll, and Charles D. Hadley. 1975. Transformations of the American Party System. New York: W.W. Norton.
Lamis, Alexander P. 1990. The Two-Party South, expanded rev. ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Lamis, Alexander P. 1999. Southern Politics in the 1990s. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Lawrence, David G. 1997. The Collapse of the Democratic Presidential Majority: Realignment, Dealignment, and Electoral Change from Franklin Roosevelt to Bill Clinton. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Mayhew, David R. 2002. Electoral Realignments: A Critique of an America Genre. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
MacRae, Duncan, Jr., and James A. Meldrum. 1960. Critical Elections in Illinois: 1888-1958. American Political Science Review 54:669-683. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953945 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400122622
Miller, Warren E. 1991. Party Identification, Realignment and Party Voting: Back to Basics. American Political Science Review 85:557-568. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963175
Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Nie, Norman H., Sidney Verba, and John R. Petrocik. 1979. The Changing American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674429147
Norpoth, Helmut, and Jerrold Rusk. 1982. Partisan Dealignment in the American Electorate: Itemizing the Deductions since 1964. American Political Science Review 76:522-537. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400188380 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963729
Parker, Suzanne L. 1988. Shifting Tides in Florida: Where Have All the Democrats Gone? In The Southís New Politics: Realignment and Dealignment, eds. Robert H. Swansbrough, and David M. Brodsky. Colombia: University of South Carolina Press.
Parker, Suzanne L. 1992. Florida A Polity in Transition. In Party Realignment and State Politics, ed. Maureen Moakley. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.
Petrocik, John R. 1981. Party Coalitions: Realignments and the Decline of the New Deal Party System. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Phillips, Kevin P. 1969. The Emerging Republican Majority. New Rochelle, NY: Arlington House.
Pomper, Gerald M. 1967. Classification of Presidential Elections. Journal of Politics 29: 535-566. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2127773
Rabinowitz, George, Paul-Henri Gurian and Stuart Elaine Macdonald. 1984. The Structure of Presidential Elections and the Process of Realignment, 1944 to 1980. American Journal of Political Science 28:611-635. Rae, Nicol C. 1989. Southern Democrats. Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2110990
Renner, Tari. 1999. Electoral Congruence and the Autonomy of American State Party Systems. American Politics Quarterly 27:122-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X99027001007
Scammon, Richard M. 1965. America at the Polls: A Handbook of American Presidential Election Statistics, 1920-1964. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Scammon, Richard M. ed. 1956-57 to 2001. America Votes: A Handbook of Contemporary American Election Statistics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Schattschneider, E.E. 1960. The Semi-Sovereign People: A Realists View of Democracy in America. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Scicchitano, Michael J., and Richard K. Scher. 1998. Florida: Political Change, 1950-1996. In The New Politics of the Old South: an Introduction to Southern Politics, eds. Charles S. Bullock and Mark J. Rozell, eds. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Seagull, Louis M. 1975. Southern Republicanism. New York: Wiley.
Shafer, Byron. 1991. The Notion of an Electoral Order: The Structure of Electoral Politics at the Accession of George Bush. In The End of Realignment? Interpreting America Electoral Eras, ed. Byron E. Shafer. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
Shea, Daniel M. 1999. The Passing of Realignment and the Advent of the 'Base-Less' Party System. American Politics Quarterly 27:33-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X99027001004
Speel, Robert W. 1998. Changing Patterns of Voting in the Northern United States: Electoral Realignment 1952-1996. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Stanley, Harold W. 1988. Southern Partisan Changes: Dealignment, Realignment, or Both? Journal of Politics 50:65-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131041
Sundquist, James L. 1983. Dynamics of the Party System: Alignment and Realignment of Political Parties in the United States, rev. ed. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1987. The Hollow Realignment: Partisan Change in Candidate-Centered Era. Public Opinion Quarterly 51:58-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/269014
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1991. The Rise of Candidate-Centered Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674865723
Wattenberg, Martin P. 1996. The Decline of American Political Parties, 1952-1994. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Wildgen, John K. 1974. The Detection of Critical Elections in the Absence of Two-Party Competition. Journal of Politics 36:465-479. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2129478
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
