Is it Better to Join the Majority? The Electoral Effects of Party Switching by Incumbent Southern State Legislators, 1972 to 2000
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2004.25.0.79-98Abstract
What are the electoral effects of a change in partisan affiliation for legislators? To answer this question, 6357 state legislative elections from 1972 to 2000 in five southern states are examined. By comparing this subset of party-switching southern legislators to their non-switching colleagues, I am able to examine (1) whether partisan affiliation and changes in party labels affect electoral outcomes over the short- and long-term; and (2) whether switching parties into the majority party in the legislature affects electoral out-comes. The findings are that incumbent legislators who switch parties do worse in general elections following their switch, especially in elections immediately following their switch. However, once these legislators have switched parties, if their party takes control of the legislature, they do no worse than their non-switching colleagues. Interestingly, other results demonstrate that southern legislators who have switched from Democrat to Republican in the 1990s have done worse following their switches, suggesting that partisan realignment among voters has not been realized completely at the state legislative level.References
Aldrich, John H. 1995. Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Party Politics in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226012773.001.0001
Aldrich, John H., and William T. Bianco. 1992. A Game Theoretic Model of Party Affiliation of Candidates and Office Holders. Mathematical and Computer Modeling 16:103-115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0895-7177(92)90090-8
Berard, Stanley P. 2001. Southern Democrats in the U.S. House of Representatives. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Berry, William D., Michael B. Berkman, and Stuart Schneiderman. 2000. Legislative Professionalism and Incumbent Reelection: The Development of Institutional Boundaries. American Political Science Review 94:859-874. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2586212
Black, Earl, and Merle Black. 2002. The Rise of Southern Republicans. Cambridge, MA: Belknap/Harvard University Press.
Canon, David T. 1992. The Emergence of the Republican Party in the South, from 1964 to 1988. In The Atomistic Congress: An Interpretation of Congressional Change, ed. Allen D. Hertzke and Ronald M. Peters, Jr. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Carey, John M., Richard G. Niemi, and Lynda W. Powell. 2000. Incumbency and the Probability of Reelection in State Legislative Elections. Journal of Politics 62:671-700. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00029
Carey, Robert T., Bruce W. Ransom, and David J. Woodard. 2002. Growth in Party Competition and the Transformation of Southern Politics. American Review of Politics 23:93-121.
Castle, David, and Patrick Fett. 2000. Member Goals and Party Switching in the U.S. Congress. In Congress on Display, Congress at Work, ed. William T. Bianco. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Clark, John A., John M. Bruce, John H. Kessel, and William G. Jacoby. 1991. Iíd Rather Switch than Fight: Lifelong Democrats and Converts to Republicanism Among Campaign Activists. American Journal of Political Science 35:577-597. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111554
Cox, Gary W., and Scott Morgenstern. 1995. The Incumbency Advantage in Multimember Districts: Evidence from the U.S. States. Legislative Studies Quarterly 20:329-349. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440224
Desposato, Scott W. 2003. Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil's Chamber of Deputies. Manuscript, University of Arizona.
Fenno, Richard F., Jr. 1973. Congressmen in Committees. Boston: Little, Brown.
Glaser, James M. 2001. When Legislators Change Sides: The Implications of Party Defections in the South. In Eye of the Storm: The South and Congress in an Era of Change. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Grose, Christian R., and Antoine Yoshinaka. 2003. The Electoral Consequences of Party Switching by Incumbent Members of Congress, 1947-2000. Legislative Studies Quarterly 28:55-75. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298003X200809
Heller, William B., and Carol Mershon. 2004. Switching in Parliamentary Parties. Manuscript, Binghamton University/University of Virginia.
Holbrook, Thomas M. and Charles M. Tidmarch. 1991. Sophomore Surge in State Legislative Elections, 1968-86. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:49-63. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439966
Hood, M.V. III, Quentin Kidd, and Irwin L. Morris. 1999. Of Byrd[s] and Bumpers: Using Democratic Senators to Analyze Political Change in the South, 1960-1995. American Journal of Political Science 43:465-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2991802
Hood, M.V. III, Quentin Kidd, and Irwin L. Morris. 2004. The Reintroduction of the Elephas Maximus to the Southern United States: The Rise of Republican State Parties, 1960 to 2000. American Politics Research 32:68-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03259196
Jewett, Aubrey W. 2001. Partisan Change in Southern Legislatures, 1946-95. Legislative Studies Quarterly 26:457-486. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440332
King, Gary, and Gerald Benjamin. 1986. The Stability of Party Identification among U.S. Representatives: Party Loyalty, 1789-1984. Paper presented at the meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Knuckey, Jonathan. 2001. Ideological Realignment and Partisan Change in the American South, 1972-1996. Politics and Policy 29:337-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2001.tb00595.x
Lamis, Alexander, ed. 1999. Southern Politics in the 1990s. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
Leal, David, Frederick M., and Syed A. Ali. 2003. Contestation versus Replacement: Republican Party Gains in Southern State Legislative Elections. Politics and Policy 31:648-670. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00166.x
Lublin, David. 2004. The Republican South. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lublin, David, and D. Stephen Voss. 2000. Racial Redistricting and Realignment and Realignment in Southern State Legislatures. American Journal of Political Science 44:792-810. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2669282
Mayhew, David R. 1974. Congress: The Reelection Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
McCarty, Nolan M., Keith T. Poole, and Howard Rosenthal. 2001. The Hunt for Party Discipline in Congress. American Political Science Review 95:673-687. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055401003069
McGlennon, John J. 2003. Party Activists in Virginia, 1991-2001: Finishing the Realignment Cycle. American Review of Politics 24:197-211.
McKee, Seth. 2003. Majority Black Districts, Republican Ascendancy, and Party Competition in the South, 1988-2000. American Review of Politics. 23:123-139.
McElroy, Gail. 2003. Party Switching in the European Parliament: Why Bother Defect? Manuscript, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Nadeau, Richard, Richard G. Niemi, Harold W. Stanley, Jean-Francois Godbout. 2004. Class, Party, and South/Non-South Differences: An Update. American Politics Research 32:52-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X03259193
Niemi, Richard G., Simon Jackman, and Laura R. Winsky. 1991. Candidacies and Competitiveness in Multimember Districts. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:91-109. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439969
Nokken, Timothy P. 2000. Dynamics of Congressional Loyalty: Party Defection and Roll-call Behavior, 1947-97. Legislative Studies Quarterly 25:417-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440414
Nokken, Timothy P., and Keith T. Poole. 2001. Congressional Party Defection in American History. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco.
Oppenheimer, Bruce I. 2000. The Roll Call Behavior of Members Who Switch Parties, 1900-99: The Effect of Variations in Party Strength. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Prysby, Charles. 1998. Party Switchers and the Party System. In Party Activists in Southern Politics, ed. Charles D. Hadley and Lewis Bowman. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Rusk, Jerrold G. 2001. A Statistical History of the American Electorate. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Shafer, Byron E., and Richard G.C. Johnston. 2001. The Transformation of Southern Politics Revisited: The House of Representatives as a Window. British Journal of Political Science 31:601-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123401000230
Stanley, Harold W., 1988. Southern Partisan Changes: Dealignment, Realignment, or Both? Journal of Politics 50:64-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131041
Van Dunk, Emily, and Ronald E. Weber. 1997. Constituency-Level Competition in the U.S. States, 1968-1988. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22:141-59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440379
Vogel, Ronald, and Phillip J. Ardoin. 2003. Rebels and Nomads: Have White Southerners Found Refuge in the Republican Party? Politics and Policy 31:130-151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1346.2003.tb00890.x
Weber, Ronald E., Harvey J. Tucker, and Paul Brace. 1991. Vanishing Marginals in State Legislative Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:29-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439965
Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2002. The Politics of Switching: A Look at Members of Congress Who Switched Parties, 1947-2002. Manuscript, University of Rochester.
Yoshinaka, Antoine. 2005. House Party Switchers and Committee Assignments: Who Gets What, When, How? Legislative Studies Quarterly, forthcoming. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298005X201608
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
