Interest Group Lobbying on a Morality Policy Issue: The Case of Physician-Assisted Suicide in Michigan

Authors

  • John Strate
  • Marvin Zalman

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2003.24.0.321-342

Abstract

Interest group lobbying on morality policy issues differs from lobbying on other kinds of issues. In this paper we use insights from the literature on morality policy politics to examine the lobbying of interest groups in Michigan on the issue of physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Morality policy politics is marked by the greater involvement of citizens groups. Citizens groups advocating policies that are publicly popular engage in disproportionate outside lobbying, but their capacity in this regard may be curtailed because of limited resources. Inside lobbying on morality policy issues focuses especially on getting various kinds of help from sympathetic legislators but does not try to change their opinions.

References

Bachman, Jerald G., Kirsten H. Alster, Richard Lichtenstein, and David J. Douglas. 1994. A Study of Michigan Public and Physicians' Views About Physician-assisted Death. Ann Arbor, MI: Survey Research Center.

Betzold, Michael. 1993. Appointment with Doctor Death. Troy, MI: Momentum Books.

Clark, Nina. 1997. The Politics of Physician-assisted Suicide. New York: Garland Publishing.

Donovan, Todd, Shaun Bowler, David McCuan, and Ken Fernandez. 1998. Continuing Players and Strategies: Opposition Advantages in Initiative Elections. Pp. 80-108 in Citizens and Legislators in the United States, eds. Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Caroline J. Tolbert. Columbus: Ohio State University Press.

Engel, Steven T., and David J. Jackson. 1998. Wielding the Stick Instead of the Carrot: Labor PAC Punishment of Pro-NAFTA Democrats, Political Research Quarterly 51:813-828. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088050 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299805100312

Fairbanks, J. David. 1977. Religious Forces and 'Morality' Politics in the American States. Western Political Quarterly 30:411-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591297703000311 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/447941

Gais, Thomas L., and Jack L. Walker, Jr. 1991. Pathways to Influence in American Politics. Pp. 103-122 in Mobilizing Interest Groups in America: Patrons, Professions, and Social Movements, ed. Jack. L. Walker, Jr. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

Glick, Henry R. 1992. The Right to Die. Policy Innovation and its Consequences. New York: Columbia University Press.

Glick, Henry R., and Amy Hutchinson. 2001. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Agenda Setting and the Elements of Morality Policy. Pp. 55-72 in The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney. New York: Chatham House.

Haider-Markel, Donald P., and Kenneth J. Meier. 1996. The Politics of Gay and Lesbian Rights: Expanding the Scope of the Conflict. Journal of Politics 58:332-350. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960229

Kollman, Ken. 1998. Outside Lobbying: Public Opinion and Interest Groups Strategies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Michigan Commission on Death and Dying. 1994. Final Report. Lansing, MI: The Commission.

Mooney, Christopher Z. 2001. The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy. Pp. 3-18 in The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney. New York: Chatham House.

Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 1995. Legislating Morality in the American States: The Case of Pre-Roe Abortion Regulation Reform. American Journal of Political Science 39:599-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111646

Mooney, Christopher Z., and Mei-Hsien Lee. 2000. The Influence of Values on Consensus and Contentious Morality Policy: U.S. Death Penalty Reform, 1956-82. Journal of Politics 62:223-239. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0022-3816.00011

Norrander, Barbara, and Clyde Wilcox. 2001. Public Opinion and Policymaking in the States: The Case of Post-Roe Abortion Policy. Pp. 143-159 in The Public Clash of Private Values: The Politics of Morality Policy, ed. Christopher Z. Mooney. New York: Chatham House.

Persels, Jim. 1993. Forcing the Issue of Physician-Assisted Suicide: Impact of the Kevorkian Case on the Euthanasia Debate. Journal of Legal Medicine 14:93-124. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01947649309510905

Schattschneider, E.E. 1975. The Semi-Sovereign People. Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.

Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and John T. Tierny. 1986. Organized Interests and American Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.

Downloads

Published

2004-01-01

Issue

Vol. 24: Winter 2003

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.