Character First: Rethinking John McCain's 2008 Campaign Strategy

Authors

  • David B. Holian
  • Charles Prysby

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2011.32.0.319-342

Abstract

Barack Obama's defeat of John McCain in 2008 was hardly surprising given the campaigns context, which was toxic for the Republican Party. Yet, in such perilous times, McCain enjoyed certain advantages, namely his reputation for strong leadership and his years of government experi-ence that could have been profitably contrasted with Obama's relative youth and inexperience. Given these advantages, we speculate as to whether McCain could have pulled even with Obama in the popular vote by increasing his lead among persuadable voters on their perceptions of the candidates character traits. Using ANES data on traits from 1988 to 2008, we conclude that, short of profound missteps by the Obama campaign, McCain would have had to accomplish more than simply shifting voter perceptions of character traits in a more favorable direction to win the election.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 2008. Forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election with the Time-For-Change Model. PS: Political Science & Politics 41(4):691-695. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096508081249 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2008.02.002

Campbell, James E. 2008. Forecasting the 2008 Elections. PS: Political Science & Politics 41(4):679-682. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096508081006

Ceaser, James W., Andrew E. Busch, and John J. Pitney, Jr. 2009. Epic Journey: The 2008 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Pub-lishers, Inc.

Conover, Pamela J. 1981. Political Cues and the Perception of Candidates. American Politics Quarterly 9(4):427-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8100900403

Draper, Robert. 2008. The Making (and Remaking and Remaking) of the Candidate. The New York Times Magazine, October 26, p. 54.

Funk, Carolyn L. 1999. Bringing the Candidate into Models of Candidate Evaluation. Journal of Politics 61(3):700-720. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647824

Goren, Paul. 2002. Character Weakness, Partisan Bias, and Presidential Evaluation. American Journal of Political Science 46(3):627-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3088404

Greene, Steven. 2001. The Role of Character Assessments in Presidential Approval. American Politics Research 29(2):196-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X01029002004

Greenstein, Fred I. 2009. The Presidential Difference: Leadership Style from FDR to Barack Obama, 3rd ed. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hayes, Danny. 2005. Candidate Qualities through a Partisan Lens: A Theory of Trait Ownership. American Journal of Political Science 49(4):908-923. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00163.x

Hershey, Marjorie Randon. 2010. The Media: Coloring the News. In The Elections of 2008, ed. Michael Nelson. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Holian, David B. 2006. Trust the Party Line: Issue Ownership and Presidential Approval from Reagan to Clinton. American Politics Research 34(6):777-802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X06290906

Hopkins, Daniel J. 2009. No More Wilder Effect, Never a Whitman Effect: When and Why Polls Mislead about Black and Female Candidates. Journal of Politics 71(3): 769-781. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381609090707

Kenski, Kate, Bruce W. Hardy, and Kathleen Hall Jamieson. 2010. The Obama Victory: How Media, Money, and Message Shaped the 2008 Election. Oxford University Press.

Kinder, Donald R. 1986. Presidential Character Revisited. In Political Cognition, eds. Richard R. Lau and David O. Sears. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Charles Tien. 2009. Race Blunts the Economic Effect? The 2008 Obama Forecast. PS: Political Science & Politics 42(1):21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1049096509230356

Markus, Gregory B. 1982. Political Attitudes during an Election Year. American Political Science Review 76(3):538-560. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400188392

McCann, James A. 1990. Changing Electoral Contexts and Changing Candidate Images During the 1984 Presidential Campaign. American Politics Quarterly 18(2):123-140. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8001800201

Miller, Warren E., and J. Merrill Shanks. 1996. The New American Voter. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Petrocik, John R. 1996. Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study. American Journal of Political Science 40(3):825-850. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111797

Pierce, Patrick A. 1993. Political Sophistication and the Use of Candidate Traits in Candidate Evaluation. Political Psychology 14(1):21-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3791391

Vavreck, Lynn. 2009. The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781400830480

Downloads

Published

2012-01-01

Issue

Vol. 32: Winter 2011-2012

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.