Latino Representation in the U. S. Congress: How Much and by Whom?

Authors

  • Juan Carlos Huerta
  • Adolfo Santos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2006.27.0.115-128

Abstract

Research on measuring support for Latino issues in Congress has found that party affiliation is the primary influence on the level of support. The research also demonstrates that under certain scenarios, Latino representatives do provide more substantive Latino representation than do non-Latino representatives. The purpose of this project is to re-evaluate these earlier findings using more recent data in a changed political context. In addition, the project will examine the effects that different types of Democrats have on Latino representation. The findings suggest that when it comes to support for Latino issues, there are differences between the parties, and within the Democratic Party. An unexpected source of Latino representation, members of the Congressional Black Caucus, is also revealed in the findings.

References

Brace, Kimball, Bernard Grofman, and Lisa Handley. 1987. Does Redistricting Aimed to Help Blacks Necessarily Help Republicans? The Journal of Politics 49:169-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131139

Butler, David, and Bruce E. Cain. 1992. Congressional Redistricting: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. New York: Macmillan.

Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting, and Representation: The Unintended Consequences of Black Majority Districts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1955. Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science 39:640-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111648

Hurley, Patricia A. 1989. Partisan Representation and the Failure of Realignment in the 1980s. American Journal of Political Science 33:240-261. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111261

Jackson, John E., and John W. Kingdon. 1992. Ideology, Interest Group Scores, and Legislative Votes. American Journal of Political Science 36(3):805-823. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111592

Kerr, Brinck, and Will Miller. 1997. Latino Representation, It's Direct and Indirect. American Journal of Political Science 41:1066-1071. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111688

Overby, L. Marvin, and Kenneth M. Cosgrove. 1996. Unintended Consequences? Racial Redistricting and the Representation of Minority Interests. Journal of Politics 58:540-550. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2960239

Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Ratcliffe, R.G., and Clay Robison. 2003. Remap Will Turn Away Minorities, Judges Told. The Houston Cronicle, December 12, p. 37.

Santos, Adolfo. 2001. Substantive Representation for Hispanics: Explaining Congressional Support for Hispanic Issues. Harvard Journal of Hispanic Policy 13:45-65.

Santos, Adolfo, and Juan Carlos Huerta. 2001. An Analysis of Descriptive and Substantive Latino Representation in Congress. In Representation of Minority Groups in the U.S.: Implications for the Twenty-first Century, ed. C. Menifield. Lanham, MD: Austin & Winfield.

Swain, Carol M. 1993. Black Faces, Black Interests: The Representation of African Americans in Congress. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Vigil, Maurilio E. 1984. Hispanics Gain Seats in the 98th Congress after Reapportionment. International Social Science Review 59:20-30.

Vigil, Maurilio E. 1994. Hispanics in the 103rd Congress: The 1990 Census, Reapportionment, Redistricting, and the 1992 Elections. Latino Studies Journal 5:40-76.

Weissberg, Robert. 1978. Collective vs. Dyadic Representation in Congress. American Political Science Review 72:535-536. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1954109

Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing. 1984. Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress. Social Science Quarterly 65:328-335.

Downloads

Published

2006-07-01

Issue

Vol. 27: Summer 2006

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.