After the Midterm Ordeal: Election Results and Presidential Belief Systems
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2006.27.0.1-20Abstract
The study of midterm elections can reveal an important influence on the beliefs of presidents. Employing constructs from the “operational code “literature regarding presidential foreign policy-making, we examine the impact of midterm election results upon presidential beliefs during two “normal” midterm elections: 1990 and 1994. We hypothesize that midterm elections encourage presidents to find the nature of the political universe more conflictual, to develop a lower locus of personal control over their environment, and to adopt more adversarial positions about their approach to personal goals. These effects should vary with the scale of the midterm setback. We find support for these hypotheses, usually with greater effects in the 1994 than 1990 case. Given the larger effects of the 1994 election upon the president, its status as a “normal” midterm election lies in question. Further research into other midterm cases is necessary to formulate a typology of midterm effects upon presidential beliefs.References
Barber, James David. 1972. The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Busch, Andrew E. 1999. Horses in Midstream: U.S. Midterm Elections and Their Consequences, 1898-1998. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Bush, George Herbert Walker. 1990. Remarks Announcing the Resignation of William J. Bennett as Director of National Drug Control Policy and a Question-and-Answer Session with Reporters November 8, 1990. Public Papers of the Presidents. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Campbell, James E. 1997. The Presidential Pulse and the 1994 Midterm Election. Journal of Politics 59:830-857. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2998639
Campbell, James E. 1991. The Presidential Surge and its Midterm Decline in Congressional Elections, 1868-1988. Journal of Politics 53:477-487. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131768 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022381600048404
Clinton, William Jefferson. 1994. Presidential News Conference November 9, 1994. Public Papers of the Presidents. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
Cook, Charlie. 1999. The President's Plummeting Poll Numbers. National Journal.com: June 1.
Day of Decision: What Decision? 1990. New York Times. November 7, A30.
Feng, Huiyun. 2005. The Operational Code of Mao Zedong: Defensive or Offensive Realist? Security Studies 14:637-662. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09636410500468818
George, Alexander L. 1969. The Operational Code: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Decision Making. International Studies Quarterly 23:190-222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3013944
George, Alexander L. 1979. The Causal Nexus between Beliefs and Behavior. Pp. 95-124 in Psychological Models in International Politics, ed. L. Falkowski. Boulder, CO: Westview.
George, Alexander, and Juliette L. George, eds. 1998. Presidential Personality and Performance. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Greenstein, Fred I. 1989. Personality and Politics. Chicago: Markham.
Hoagland, S., and S. Walker 1979. Operational Codes and Crisis Outcomes. Pp. 125-198 in Psychological Models in International Politics, ed. L. Falkowski. Boulder, CO: Westview.
Holsti, O. 1977. The Operational Code as an Approach to the Analysis of Belief Systems. Final Report to the National Science Foundation, Grant No. SOC 75-15368. Durham, NC: Duke University.
Larson, Deborah W. 1988. Problems of Content Analysis in Foreign-Policy Research: Notes from the Study of the Origins of Cold War Belief Systems. International Studies Quarterly 32:241-255. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600629
Leites, Nathan. 1953. A Study of Bolshevism. New York: Free Press.
Leites, Nathan. 1951. The Operational Code of the Politburo. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Malici, Akan. 2006. Germans as Venutians: The Culture of German Foreign Policy Behavior. Foreign Policy Analysis 2:37-62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00019.x
Malici, Akan. 2005. Discord and Collaboration between Allies. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49:90-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022002704269356
Morris, Dick. 1997. Behind the Oval Office: Winning the White House in the Nineties. New York: Random House.
Neustadt, Richard E. 1990. Presidential Power and the Modern Presidents: The Politics of Leadership from Roosevelt to Reagan. New York: Free Press.
Petrocik, John R., and Frederick T. Steeper. 1986. The Midterm Referendum: The Importance of Attributions of Responsibility. Political Behavior 8:206-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF01002098
Pious, Richard M. 1979. The American Presidency. New York: Basic Books.
Rasler, Karen, William R. Thompson, and Kathleen Chester. 1980. Foreign Policy Makers, Personality Attributes and Interviews: A Note on Reliability Problems. International Studies Quarterly 24:47-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600127
Renshon, Stanley A. 1996. The Psychological Assessment of Presidential Candidates. New York: NYU Press.
Republican Gains and Obligations. 1994. New York Times. November 9, A26.
Selim, Mohammed ElSayed. 1979. The Operational Code of Belief System and Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Case of Gamal Abdel-Nasser. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Carleton University.
Schafer, Mark, and Stephen Walker. 2006. Beliefs and Leadership in World Politics: Methods and Applications of Operational Code Analysis. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781403983497
Schafer, Mark, Sam Robison, and Bradley Aldrich. 2006. Operational Codes and the Easter Rising in Ireland: A Test of the Frustration-Aggression Hypothesis. Foreign Policy Analysis 2:63-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1743-8594.2005.00020.x
Schneider, William. 1990. The In-Box President. The Atlantic Monthly 265:34-43.
Snyder, Richard C., H.W. Bruck, and Burton Sapin. 1954. Foreign Policy Decision-Making as an Approach to the Study of International Politics. Foreign Policy Analysis Project Series, No. 3. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University.
Sprout, Harold, and Margaret Sprout. 1956. Man-Milieu Relationship Hypotheses in the Context of International Politics. Princeton, NJ: Center of International Studies at Princeton University.
Stanley, Harold W., and Niemi, Richard G. 2000. Vital Statistics on American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Suedfeld, Peter, and Philip E. Tetlock. 1977. Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 21:168-178.
Walker, Stephen G., and Mark Schafer. 2003. The Contributions of Operational Code Analysis to Foreign Policy Theory: Beliefs as Causal Mechanisms. Manuscript prepared for Advances in Foreign Policy Analysis Yearbook, ed. Alex Mintz. Forthcoming, Palgrave.
Walker, Stephen G., Mark Schafer, and Micheal Young. 1998. Systematic Procedures for Operational Code Analysis. International Studies Quarterly 42:175-190. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0020-8833.00074
Winter, David G., and Abagail Stewart. 1977. Content Analysis as a Method of Studying Political Leaders. In A Psychological Examination of Political Leaders, ed. Margaret Hermann. New York: Free Press.
Young, Michael, and March Schafer. 1998. Is there Method in our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations. Mershon International Studies Review 42:63-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/254444
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
