Thinking Outside the Quality Box: The Impact of Candidate Motivations on Election Outcomes

Authors

  • Douglas D. Roscoe
  • Shannon Jenkins
  • John Frendreis
  • Alan R. Gitelson

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2006.27.0.21-43

Abstract

Explanations for election outcomes have commonly included incumbency and candidate quality. While these explanations have been successful, they do not wholly explain who wins or loses. To move beyond the concepts of incumbency and quality, a typology of candidates is developed based on their motivations for running. Hierarchical cluster analysis is employed to examine open-ended responses from state legislative candidates in nine states. The resulting typologies are found to be connected to influences on candidate emergence and perceptions of factors that influenced the election outcome. They also prove to be statistically significant predictors of election victory even when controlling for incumbency, quality, spending, and campaign professionalism. The findings should encourage others to move beyond conventional explanations of election out-comes.

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. Explaining Senate Election Outcomes. American Political Science Review 82:385-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1957392

Asch, David A., M. Kathryn Jedrziewski, and Nicholas A. Christakis. 1997. Response Rates to Mail Surveys Published in Medical Journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50:1129-1136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0895-4356(97)00126-1

Babbie, Earl. 2004. The Practice of Social Research, 10th ed. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

Bianco, William T. 1984. Strategic Decisions on Candidacy in U.S. Congressional Districts. Legislative Studies Quarterly 9:351-364. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439396

Bond, Jon R., Richard Fleisher, and Jeffery C. Talbert. 1997. Partisan Differences in Candidate Quality in Open Seat House Races, 1976-1994. Political Research Quarterly 50:281-299. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448958 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299705000202

Born, Richard. 1986. Strategic Politicians and Unresponsive Voters. American Political Science Review 80:599-612. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1958276

Canon, David T. 1990. Actors, Athletes, and Astronauts. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Conway, M. Margaret, and Frank B. Feigert. 1968. Motivation, Incentive Systems, and the Political Party Organization. American Political Science Review. 62:1159-1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1953910

Erikson, Robert S., and Gerald C. Wright. 2005. Voters, Candidates, and Issues in Congressional Elections. In Congress Reconsidered, 8th ed., eds. Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Everitt, Brian, Sabine Landau, and Morven Leese. 2001. Cluster Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781420057492.ch10 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118887486.ch6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4757-3285-6_20

Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2005. To Run or Not to Run for Office: Ex-plaining Nascent Political Ambition. American Journal of Political Science 49:642-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2005.00147.x

Gierznski, Anthony, and David Breaux. 1991. Money and Votes in State Legislative Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16:203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439978

Green, Donald Philip, and Jonathan S. Krasno. 1988. Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections. American Journal of Political Science 32:884-907. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111193

Herrnson, Paul S. 1992. Campaign Professionalism and Fundraising in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics 54:859-870. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2132315

Hogan, Robert E. 2001. Campaign War Chests and Challenger Emergence in State Legislative Elections. Political Research Quarterly 54:815-830. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591290105400407 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/449236

Howell, Susan E. 1982. Campaign Activities and State Election Outcomes. Political Behavior 4: 401-417. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00986971

Jacobson, Gary C. 2001. The Politics of Congressional Elections, 5th ed. New York: Longman.

Jacobson, Gary C. 1989. Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of U.S. House Elections. American Political Science Review 83:773-793. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1962060

Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Jenkins, Shannon. 2006. The Impact of Party and Ideology on Roll-Call Voting in State Legislatures. Legislative Studies Quarterly 31:235-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298006X201797

Krasno, Jonathan S. 1994. Challengers, Competition and Reelection: Comparing Senate and House Elections. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Downloads

Published

2006-04-01

Issue

Vol. 27: Spring 2006

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.