Economic Interests and the Framing of the 1988 and 1992 Deomcratic and Republican Party Platforms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1995.16.0.79-93Abstract
In this paper, the role that economic groups play in attempting to shape party platforms is examined by analyzing economic group presence at the 1988 and 1992 Democratic and Republican platform writing hearings. Whether the same economic groups participating as witnesses in the platform writing hearings also contributed to the presidential campaigns is also explored. The findings suggest that economic interest group participation varied widely between 1988 and 1992 and declined across years. Trade associations dominated economic group participation whereas labor unions did not take an active role. Business interests showed a strong preference for the Republicans in 1988 and reasonably equal interest in both parties the following year. The participatory decline among these groups may be explained by a growing perception that platforms are less effective as campaign guides and policy tools in an era dominated by candidate centered elections, split ticket voting and increasing independent identification, all indicators of decreasing reliance on the parties at the mass and elite levels.References
Budge, Ian and Richard I. Hofferbert. 1990. Mandates and Policy Outputs: U.S. Party Platforms and Federal Expenditures. American Political Science Review 84:111- 131. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963632
Burek, Deborah M., ed. 1992. Encyclopedia of Associations. 26th ed.; Detroit, MI: Gale Research Inc.
Burris, Val. 1987. The Political Partisanship of American Business: A Study of Corporate Political Action Committees. American Sociological Review 52:732-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2095832
Cigler, Allan J. and Burdett A. Loomis, eds. 1986. Interest Group Politics 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Edelman, Murray. 1964. The Symbolic Uses of Politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
__________ . 1971. Politics as Symbolic Action: Mass Arousal and Quiescence. New York: Academic Press.
Eismeier, Theodore J. and Philip H. Pollock III. 1988. Business, Money and the Rise of Corporate PACs in American Elections. New York, NY: Quorum Books.
Elder, Charles D. and Roger W. Cobb. 1983. The Political Uses o f Symbols. New York: Longman.
Fine, Terri Susan. 1991. National Party Platforms and Platform Writing. In L. Sandy Maisel, ed., Encyclopedia of American Political Parties and Elections. New York: Garland.
__________. 1994. Interest Groups and the Framing of the 1988 Party Platforms. Polity 26:517-30. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3235157
Fiorina, Morris. 1990. The Electorate in the Voting Booth. In L. Sandy Maisel, ed. The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Fishel, Jeffrey. 1985. Presidents and Promises: From Campaign Pledge to Presidential Performance. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Frantzich, Stephen. 1989. Political Parties in a Technological Age. New York: Longman.
Gais, Thomas, Mark Peterson and Jack Walker. 1984. Interest Groups, Iron Triangles and Representative Institutions in American National Government. British Journal of Political Science 14:161-185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0007123400003513
Goddeeris, John. 1989. Modeling Interest Group Campaign Contributions. Public Finance Quarterly 17(2): 158-184. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109114218901700202
Green, John C. and James L. Guth. 1986. Big Bucks and Petty Cash: Party and Interest Group Activists in American Politics. In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds. Interest Group Politics. 2nd ed.; Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Greenwald, Carol. 1979. Group Power: Lobbying and Public Policy. New York: Praeger.
Hamm, Keith E. 1983. Patterns of Influence Among Committees, Agencies, and Interest Groups. Legislative Studies Quarterly 8:379-427. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439591
Handler, Edward and John R. Mulkem. 1982. Business in Politics: Campaign Strategies of Corporate Political Action Committees. Lexington, MA: D.C. Heath.
Herndon, James F. 1982. Access, Record and Competition as Influences on Interest Group Contributions to Congressional Campaigns. Journal o f Politics 44:996-1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2130670
Hetzner III, C.N. and Stu Westin. 1987. Legislative Ratings as a Metric of Goal Cohesion within Interest Groups: Business vs. Labor. Public Choice 53 (1) :21 -39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00115652
Lindblom, Charles. 1977. Politics and Markets: The World's Political Economic Systems. New York: Basic Books.
Maisel, L. Sandy, ed. 1990. The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Malbin, Michael J., ed. 1984. Money and Politics in the United States. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Nadel, Mark. 1971. The Politics of Consumer Protection. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
Orren, Gary R. and William G. Mayer. 1990. The Press, Political Parties, and the Public-Private Balance in Elections. In L. Sandy Maisel, ed., The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Parris, Judith. 1972. The Convention Problem: Issues in Reform of Presidential Nominating Procedures. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
Pomper, Gerald and Susan Lederman. 1980. Elections in America: Control and Influence in Democratic Politics. 2nd ed.; New York: Longman.
Sabato, Larry J. 1984. PAC Power: Inside the World o f Political Action Committees. New York: Norton.
Shea, Maureen and Ellen Miller. 1989. PACs on PACs: The View from the Inside. Center for Responsive Politics, Washington, DC.
Thibault, John and Harold Kelley. 1961. The Social Psychology of Groups. New York: John Wiley.
Truman, David. 1951. The Governmental Process. New York: Knopf.
Wilhite, Allen and John Theilmann. 1987. Labor PAC Contributions and Labor Legislation: A Simultaneous Logit Approach. Public Choice 53(3):267-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00127351
Ziegler, L. Harmon and Michael Baer. 1969. Lobbying: Interaction arid Influence in American State Legislatures. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
