Descriptive Representatives, Party Status, and Latino Representation in Congressional Legislation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.2011.32.0.57-76Abstract
Empirical research has yet to adequately address the substantive implications of Latino descriptive representation in legislative activities like bill sponsorship, or to explore whether party status impacts the relationship between descriptive and substantive representation. I examine an original dataset of bills sponsored during the 109th and 110th congresses to assess the effect of descriptive representation on the sponsorship of Latino interest bills. Results illustrate that Latino representatives sponsored more Latino interest bills than their non-Latino colleagues during both congresses. The heightened commitment of Latino representatives to the sponsorship of Latino interest bills was unaffected by important partisan changes during the period in question, underscoring the substantive effect of descriptive representation.References
Bratton, Kathleen A. 2006. The Behavior and Success of Latino State Legislators: Evidence from the States. Social Science Quarterly 87:1136-1157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2006.00420.x
Canon, David T. 1999. Race, Redistricting and Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Casellas, Jason Paul. 2007. Latino Representation in Congress: To What Extent Are Latinos Substantively Represented. In Latino Politics: Identity, Mobilization and Representation, eds. Rodolfo Espino, David Leal, and Kenneth J. Meier. Charlottesville: University of Virginia.
Eulau, Heinz, and Paul D. Karps. 1977. The Puzzle of Representation: Specifying Components of Responsiveness. Legislative Studies Quarterly 2:233-254. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439340
Frantzich, Stephen. 1979. Who Makes Our Laws? The Legislative Effectiveness of Members of the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 4:409-428. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439582
Fenno, Richard F. 1977. U.S. House Members in Their Constituencies: An Exploration. American Political Science Review 71:883-917. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1960097 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0003055400265143
Fenno, Richard. 2003. Going Home, Black Representatives and their Constituents. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226241326.001.0001
Hall, Richard. 1996. Participation in Congress. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Hero, Rodney E., and Caroline J. Tolbert. 1995. Latinos and Substantive Representation in the U.S. House of Representatives: Direct, Indirect, or Nonexistent? American Journal of Political Science 39:640-652. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111648
Huerta, Juan Carlos, and Adolfo Santos. 2006. Latino Representation in the U.S. Congress: How Much and by Whom? American Review of Politics 27:115-128.
Kerr, Brinck, and Will Miller. 1997. Latino Representation, It's Direct and Indirect. American Journal of Political Science 41:1066-1077. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111688
Knoll, Benjamin R. 2009. ¿Amigo de la Raza? Reexamining Determinants of Latino Support in the U.S. Congress. Social Science Quarterly 90:179-195. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6237.2009.00610.x
Long, J. Scott, and Jeremy Freese. 2003. Regression Models for Categorical and Dependent Variables Using STATA. College Station, TX: STATA Press.
Lublin, David. 1997. The Paradox of Representation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mansbridge, Jane. 1999. Should Blacks Represent Blacks and Women Represent Women? A Contingent 'Yes.' Journal of Politics 61:628-657. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2647821
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven, CT: Yale University.
Menifield, Charles E., ed. 2001. Representation of Minority Groups in the U.S. Lanham, MD: Austin and Winfield Publishers.
Miller, Warren E., and Donald E. Stokes. 1963. Constituency Influence in Congress. American Political Science Review 57:45-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1952717
Meier, Kenneth. 1993. Latinos and Representative Bureaucracy: Testing Thompson and Henderson Hypotheses. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 3:393-414.
Moore, Michael K., and Sue Thomas. 1991. Explaining Legislative Success in the U.S. Senate: The Role of Majority and Minority Parties. Western Political Quarterly 44:959-970. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591299104400409 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448802
Pitkin, Hanna Fenichel. 1967. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Poole, Keith T., and Howard Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rocca, Michael, and Gabriel R. Sanchez. 2008 The Effect of Race and Ethnicity on Bill Sponsorship and Cosponsorship in Congress. American Politics Research 36:1.
Rosenthal, Cindy Simon, ed. 2002. Women Transforming Congress. Norman: University of Oklahoma.
Ross, Ashley D., Stella M. Rouse, and Kathleen A. Bratton. 2010. Latino Representation and Education: Pathways to Latino Student Performance. State Politics and Policy Quarterly 10:69-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/153244001001000104
Santos, Adolfo, and Juan Huerta. 2001. An Analysis of Descriptive and Substantive Latino Representation in Congress. Pp. 57-76 in Representation of Minority Groups in the U.S., ed. Charles E. Menifield. Lanham, MD: Austin and Winfield Publishers.
Swain, Carol. 1993. Black Faces Black Interests. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Swers, Michele L. 2002. The Difference Women Make. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Tamerius, Karen. 1995. Sex, Gender, and Leadership in the Representation of Women. In Gender Power, Leadership and Governance, eds. Georgia Duerst-Lahti and Rita Mae Kelly. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. New York: Cambridge University. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790652
Williams, Melissa. 1998. Voice Trust and Memory. Princeton, NJ: Princeto University.
Wilson, Walter. 2009. Latino Representation on Congressional Websites. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34:427-448. http://dx.doi.org/10.3162/036298009788897754
Welch, Susan, and John R. Hibbing. 1984. Hispanic Representation in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10:125-134. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440119
Wolbrecht, Christina. 2002. Female Legislators and the Women's Rights Agenda: From Feminine Mystique to Feminist Era. In Women Transforming Congress, ed. Cindy Simon Rosenthal. Norman: University of Oklahoma.
Young, Iris Marion. 2000. Inclusion and Democracy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.