The Role of Parties in Legislative Campaign Financing
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1994.15.0.171-189Abstract
The purpose of the analysis presented in this paper is to examine the role that party organizations play in campaign finance systems of state legislative elections. Party organizations are found to be more likely to fund candidates in competitive elections and more likely to fund challengers than are nonparty organizations. The impact of an increased role for party organizations in campaign finance systems is illustrated by simulating the distribution of campaign money and the results of state legislative elections under different scenarios of party funding.References
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1988. Explaining Senate Election Outcomes. American Political Science Review 82: 385-403. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1957392
___________. 1990. Incumbency, Campaign Spending, and the Decline of Competition in U.S. House Elections. Paper presented at the 1990 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Bibby, John F., Cornelius P. Cotter, James L. Gibson, and Robert J. Huckshorn. 1990. Parties in State Politics. In Virginia Gray. Herbert Jacob, and Robert B. Albritton, eds., Politics in the American States: A Comparative Analysis. fifth edition. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman/Little. Brown.
Biersack, Robert and Clyde Wilcox. 1989. The Role of Campaign Finance in the Electoral Process. Paper presented at the 1989 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Breaux, David. 1990. Specifying the Impact of Incumbency on State Legislative Elections: A District-Level Analysis. American Politics Quarterly 18: 270-286. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X9001800302
___________ and Anthony Gierzynski. 1991. 'It's Money that Matters': Campaign Expenditures and State Legislative Primaries. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 429-443. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440106
Caldeira. Gregory A., and Samuel C. Patterson. 1982. Bringing Home the Votes: Electoral Outcomes in State Legislative Races. Political Behavior 4: 33-67.
Campbell, James E. and Joe A. Sumners. 1990. Presidential Coattails in Senate Elections. The American Political Science Review 84: 513-524. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1963532
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper and Row.
Garand. James C. 1991. Electoral Marginality in State Legislative Elections, 1968-1986. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 7-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439964
Gierzynski, Anthony. 1992. Legislative Party Campaign Committees in the American States. Lexington, KY: University Press of Kentucky.
___________ and David Breaux. 1991a. Money and Votes in State Legislative Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 203-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439978
___________. 1991b. The Role of Money in Legislative Elections. Paper presented at the 1991 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Giles. Michael W., and Anita Pritchard. 1985. Campaign Expenditures and Legislative Elections in Florida. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 71-88.
Green, Donald Philip, and Jonathan Krasno. 1988. Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections. American Journal o f Political Science 32: 884-907.
Herrnson. Paul S. 1986. Do the Parties Make a Difference? The Role of Party Organizations in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics 48: 589-615. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2131169
__________ . 1988. Party Campaigning in the 1980s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Holbrook, Thomas M. and Charles M. Tidmarch. 1991. Sophomore Surge in State Legislative Elections, 1968-86. Legislative Studies Quarterly 16: 49-64.
Jacobson. Gary C. 1985. Party Organization and Distribution of Campaign Resources: Republicans and Democrats in 1982. Political Science Quarterly 4: 603-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2151543
__________ . 1985. Parties and PACs in Congressional Elections. In Lawrence Dodd and Bruce Oppenheimer.eds., Congress Reconsidered. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
__________ . 1980. Money in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Jewell, Malcolm E. and David Breaux. 1988. The Effect of Incumbency in State Legislative Elections. Legislative Studies Quarterly 13: 495-510. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/439781
Jones, Ruth. 1984. Financing State Elections. In Michael Malbin, ed., Money and Politics in the United States: Financing Elections in the 1980s. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
__________ and Thomas J. Borris. 1985. Strategic Contributing in Legislative Campaigns: The Case of Minnesota. Legislative Studies Quarterly 10: 89-105. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/440117
Kurtz, Karl. 1989. State Legislatures in the 1990s. Paper prepared for the Public Affairs Council Handbook on State Government Relations, June, 1989. *
Ross, Robert L. 1988. The Mobility of Campaign Money in Iowa, 1986: Parties, PACs, and State Legislative Candidates. Paper presented at the 1988 Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association.
Sorauf, Frank J. 1988. Money in American Elections. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresmanand Company.
Tucker. Harvey J. and Ronald E. Weber. 1987. State Legislative Election Outcomes: Contextual Effects and Legislative Performance Effects. Legislative Studies Quarterly 12: 537-553.
Welch. William P. 1974. The Economics of Campaign Funds. Public Choice 20.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.