Party Organizational Response to Electoral Change: Texas and Arkansas

Authors

  • Andrew M. Appleton
  • Daniel S. Ward

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1994.15.0.191-212

Abstract

This article examines the ways in which state parties have responded to changes in patterns of electoral competition. We contend that parties have tended to alter their organizational practices not only in anticipation of future elections, but also as a function of previous ones. The data are formed by case studies of the Republican parties in Texas and Arkansas in the 1960s and 1970s. The sources of much of these data were the records of the parties themselves. This time period was chosen as it represents a dynamic period for Southern parties when the electoral landscape of the region was transformed. Both Republican party organizations were faced with opportunities that resulted from unanticipated election victories; however, the Texas party was more successful in capitalizing on this opportunity. We explain this by a number of organizational attributes.

References

Appleton. Andrew and Daniel S. Ward. 1993. Party Transformation in France and the United States: The Hierarchical Effects of System Change in Comparative Perspective. Comparative Politics 26: 69-98.

Bass. Jack and Walter DeVries. 1976. The Transformation of Southern Politics: Social Change and Political Consequence Since 1945. New York: Basic Books.

Black. Earl and Merle Black. 1987. Politics and Society in the South. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Blair, Diane D. 1988. Arkansas Politics and Government: Do the People Rulel Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

Casdorph. Paul. 1965. A History of the Republican Party in Texas, 1965-1965. Austin: The Pemberton Press.

Cotter, Cornelius P., James L. Gibson, John F. Bibby, and Robert J. Huckshorn. 1984. Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.

Cotter. Cornelius P. and John F. Bibby. 1980. Institutional Development of Parties and the Thesis of Party Decline. Political Science Quarterly 94: 1-27.

Dillard, Tom W. 1981. Winthrop Rockefeller. In Timothy P. Donovan and Willard B. Gatewood, Jr. eds., The Governors of Arkansas: Essays in Political Biography. Fayetteville AR: University of Arkansas Press.

Harmel. Robert and Kenneth Janda. 1993. Leadership. Factions, and Change in Party Organizations and Identity. Paper presented at the 1993 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington. DC.

__________. 1992. An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change. Paper presented at the 1992 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago IL.

Key. V.O. Jr. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Knopf.

Knaggs, John R. 1986. Two-Party Texas. Austin: Eakin Press.

Lamis, Alexander P. 1990. The Two-Party South, second ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lunch, William. 1987. The Nationalization of American Politics. Los Angeles: University of California Press.

March, James and Herbert Simon. 1959. Organizations. New York: Wiley.

Starr. John R. 1987. Yellow Dogs and Dark Horses. Little Rock: August House.

Urwin. Cathy K. 1991. Agenda For Reform: Winthrop Rockefeller As Governor o f Arkansas, 1967- 71. Fayetteville AR: University of Arkansas Press.

Ward, John L. 1978. The Arkansas Rockefeller. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Weeks. O. Douglas. 1965. Texas in 1964—A One-Party State Again? Austin: University of Texas Institute of Public Affairs.

__________. 1972. Texas: Land of Conservative Expansiveness. In William C. Havard. ed., The Changing Politics of the South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Yates, Richard E. 1972. Arkansas: Independent and Unpredictable. In William C. Havard, ed., The Changing Politics of the South. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.

Downloads

Published

1994-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles