Intimate Connections: Political Interests and Group Activity in State and Local Parties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1994.15.0.257-289Abstract
Using data from the 1988 Party Elite Study, this paper tests two different models of how interests and parties are related among a national sample of state and local party leaders and activists. Two models of interest intermediation are compared: the pluralist model stressing consensus and bipartisanship, and the party government model stressing conflict and partisanship. New research is reviewed suggesting that political interests have become nationalized and work within the parties. Using Stinchcombe’s "crucial experiment," opposing assumptions of the two models are compared. While we do not test whether interests and parties are equally strong, we do find that strong parties and strong interests share a complementary, even intimate relationship. Strong support is found for the pervasiveness of interests among party elites, the presence of distinct party-linked ideological differences between group members and non-members, linkage between interest membership and organized party factions, group structuring of political information and communication, and a group consciousness. Based on these findings, we find support for the advent of true factions in the contemporary party system, and the conflict model of partisan intermediation in the post-reform party system is confirmed. The fact that interests are so strongly intertwined with the state and local parties provides disconfirmation of the pervasive myth that strong interests lead to decline at the grassroots.References
Baer. Denise L. 1993. Who Has the Body? Institutionalization and Theories of Party Organization. American Review of Politics 14: 1-32.
___________ and David A. Bositis. 1988. Elite Cadres and Party Coalitions: Representing the Public in Party Politics. Westport: Greenwood Press.
___________ and David A. Bositis. 1993. Politics and Linkage in a Democratic Society. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Banfield. Edward C. 1980. Party •Reform* in Retrospect. In Robert M. Goldwin, ed. Political Parties in the Eighties. Washington. DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Bauer, Raymond. Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Lewis Anthony Dexter. 1972. American Business and Public Policy. Chicago: Aldine.
Baumgartner, Frank R. and Jack L. Walker. 1988. Survey Research and Membership in Voluntary Associations. American Journal of Political Science 32: 908-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2111194
Belloni, Frank, and Dennis C. Beller, eds. 1978. Faction Politics: Political Parties and Factionalism in Comparative Perspective. Santa Barbara: ABC-Clio.
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1989. Subgovemments, Issue Networks, and Political Conflict. In Richard A. Harris and Sidney M. Milkis, eds., Remaking American Politics. Boulder: Westview Press.
Berry, Jeffrey M. 1993. Citizen Groups and the Changing Nature of Interest Group Politics in America. The Annals o f the American Academy of Political and Social Science 528: 30-41.
Browning, Rufus P., Dale Rogers Marshall, and David H. Tabb, eds. 1990. Racial Politics in American Cities. New York: Longman.
Cigler, Allan J., and Burdett Loomis, eds. 1991. Interest Group Politics, third edition. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Costain, Anne. 1978. An Analysis of Voting in American National Nominating Conventions, 1940- 1976. American Politics Quarterly 6: 95-120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X7800600104
Cotter, Cornelius P., James L. Gibson, John F. Bibby, and Robert J. Huckshorn. 1984. Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.
Crotty, William J., ed. 1986. Political Parties in Local Areas. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
David, Paul T., Ralph M. Goldman, and Richard C. Bain. 1960. The Politics o f National Nominating Conventions. Washington, DC: Brookings.
Duverger, Maurice. 1954. Political Parties. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Eldersveld, Samuel. 1986. The Party Activist in Detroit and Los Angeles: A Longitudinal View, 1956-1980. In William J. Crotty, ed., Political Parties in Local Areas. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
___________ . 1986. Research on Local Party Activists and Organizations: Major Questions for the Agenda. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.
Freeman, Jo. 1993. Women at the 1992 Democratic and Republican Conventions. P.S.: Politics and Political Science 26: Goldman, Ralph. 1991. The Nominating Process: Factionalism as a Force for Democratization. Midsouth Political Science Journal 12: 42-64.
Hayes, Michael T. 1983. Interest Groups: Pluralism or Mass Society? In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett A. Loomis, eds., Interest Group Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Heinz, John P., Edward O. Laumann, Robert L. Nelson, and Robert H. Salisbury. 1993. The Hollow Core: Private Interests in National Policy Making. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Herrnson, Paul. 1990. Reemergent National Party Organizations. In L. Sandy Maisel, ed., The Parties Respond: Changes in the American Party System. Boulder: Westview Press.
Jackson, John S. III, Barbara Leavitt Brown, and David A. Bositis. 1982. Herbert McClosky and Friends Revisited: 1980 Democratic and Republican Elites Compared to the Mass Public. American Politics Quarterly 10: 158-180. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/004478082010002002
Key, V O. 1950. Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, Inc.
Mack, Charles S. 1989. Lobbying and Government Relations. New York: Quorum Books.
Miller, Penny M., Malcolm E. Jewell, and Lee Sigelman. 1987. Reconsidering a Typology of Incentives Among Campaign Activists. Western Political Quarterly 40: 519-526. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591298704000309 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/448388
Morehouse, Sarah McCally. 1981. State Politics, Parties and Policy. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Mundo, Philip A. 1992. Interest Groups: Cases and Characteristics. Chicago: Nelson-Hall.
Munger, F. and J. Blackhurst. 1965. Factionalism in the National Conventions, 1940-1964. Journal of Politics 27: 375-94. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2128079
Omstein, Norman J., and Shirley Elder. 1978. Interest Groups, Lobbying, and Policymaking. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Patterson, Thomas E. 1993. Let the Press Be the Press: Principles of Campaign Reform. In 1-800-PRESIDENT: The Report o f the Twentieth Century Fund Task Force on Television and the Campaign of 1992. New York: Twentieth Century Press.
Petracca, Mark P., ed. 1992. The Politics o f Interests: Interest Groups Transformed. Boulder: Westview Press.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1960. Decision-making at the National Conventions. Western Political Quarterly 13: 609-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/444100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/106591296001300304
___________ . 1983. Consequences of Party Reform. New York: Oxford University Press.
Popkin, Samuel L. 1991. The Reasoning Voter: Communication and Persuasion in Presidential Campaigns. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Pressman, Jeffrey. 1977-78. Groups and Group Caucuses. Political Science Quarterly 92: 673-82. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2148852
Reiter, Howard L. 1980. Party Factionalism: National Conventions in the New Era. American Politics Quarterly 8: 303-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8000800303
Rosenthal, Alan. 1993. The Third House: Lobbyists and Lobbying in the States. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1994. Voluntary Organizations in Politics: Who Gets Involved? In William Crotty, Mildred A. Schwartz and John C. Green, eds., Representing Interests and Interest Group Representation. Washington. DC: University Press of America and The Ray C. Bliss Institute of Applied Politics.
Stinchcombe, Arthur. 1968. Constructing Social Theories. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World.
Thurber, James. 1991. Dynamics of Policy Subsystems in American Politics. In Allan J. Cigler and Burdett Loomis, eds., Interest Group Politics, third, ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Wilson, Graham K. 1985. Business and Politics. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-17936-7
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
