Trade Politics and the Fast Track: Impact on Congressional-Presidential Relations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1994.15.0.73-87Abstract
Congress and the President share responsibility for trade policy. While Congress has constitutional advantages in controlling trade, the President, through his powers to initiate and administer policy, can counteract these advantages and circumvent Congressional checks on presidential action. Methods for making trade policy—treaty making, executive agreement and fast tracking—bring the President and Congress into very different relationships. Fast tracking is an arrangement between Congress and the President that brings closure to multilateral and bilateral trade agreements without burdening the agreement with Congressional amendments. Under fast tracking, the President shapes trade policy from beginning to end; the Congress, which only has input through its elite trade committees, only can accept or reject such policy, without altering it. This makes fast tracking the latest and in some ways the most critical mechanism of presidential dominance in trade policy. Such a process has policy implications for members of Congress and threatens to change how Congresspersons govern and represent their constituencies. By altering the extent to which a member of Congress can shape trade policy, fast tracking potentially frustrates legislative representation, reduces Congress to a passive institution of response, and thus poses a major challenge to the traditional relationship between the President and Congress.References
Bauer. Raymond A . Ithiel do Sola Pool. Lewis A. Dexter. 1963. American Business and Public Policy The Politics of Foreign Trade. New York: Atherton Press.
Bentsen, Lloyd. 1992. Should Congress Extend Fast Track Negotiating Authority? Congressional Digest (August. 40-46).
Bomor. David E. 1993 Interview by author. 15 December (tape recording). H107 Capitol Building. Washington. DC.
Clausen. Aage R 1973. How Congressmen Decide: A Policy Focus. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Cloud. David S 1993 . Trade: Extension of Fast-Track Rules Seen Prodding GATT Talks. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 1 May: 1076.
Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1989. After Three Years. Trade Bill Finally Clears. 44: 226. Washington. DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Congressional Quarterly Almanac. 1974. Trade Reform: New Tariff Adjustment Powers Asked. 29: 42A-47A.
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 14 April 1973. Trade Reform Act: Nixon Asks Unprecedented Powers. 31: 848.
____________ . 14 April 1973. Text of Trade Message. 3 i: 851-856.
___________ . 25 May 1991. House Votes 114, 115, 116. 49: 1408-1409.
____________ . 1 June 1991. Senate Votes 86. 49: 1464.
Cooper. Kenneth J. 1993. NAFTA Split Parlies. Shuffled Politics as Administration Overtook Opponents. Washington Post 18 November: A l.
____________and Peter Behr. 1993. Sun Belt vs. Rust Belt: Trade Pact Debate Causes Regional Conflict. Washington Post 6 November: A l. A6.
Davidson. Roger W. 1969. The Role of the Congressman. New York: Pegasus.
Dewar. Helen. 21 November 1993. NAFTA Wins Final Congressional Test. Washington Post, A l.
Destler. I.M. 1986. American Trade Politics: System Under Stress. Washington. DC: Institute for International Economics.
____________. 1992. American Trade Politics, second ed. Washington. DC and New York: Institute for International Economics and The Twentieth Century Fund.
Dorgan. Byron L. 1991. Fast Track to Unfair Trade. Washington Post 20 May: Al l .
Eisenstadt. Todd. 1991. Keep the "Fast Track" Honest. Christian Science Monitor 2 August: 19.
Haggard. Stephen. 1988. The Institutional Foundations of Hegemony: Explaining the Trade Agreements Act of 1934. International Organization 42: 91-119.
Hayes. Michael T. 1981. Lobbyists and Legislators: A Theory of Political Markets. New Brunswick. NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Helms. Jesse. 1992. Should Congress Extend Fast Track Negotiating Authority? Congressional Digest (February: 41-51).
Journal of Commerce and Commercial. 27 February 1991: 8A. Approve Fast Track.
Lewis. Charles. 1993. The NAFTA-Math. Washington Post 26 December: C2.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1963 October/1964 July. American Business. Public Policy. Case-Studies, and Political Theory. World Politics 16: 677-715. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2009452
Martin. Elizabeth M. 1992. Fast Track and Free Trade: Why Does Congress Delegate? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association. Chicago. IL.
Nelson. Douglas. 1989. Domestic Political Preconditions of U.S. Trade Policy: Liberal Structure and Protectionist Dynamics. Journal of Public Policy 9: 83-108.
P.L. 93-618. 1974. Trade Act of 1974.
P.L. 98-573. 1979. Trade Agreements Act of 1979.
P.L. 98-573. 1984. Tariff and Trade Act of 1984.
P.L. 100-418. 1988. Omnibus Trade Competitiveness Act of 1988.
Ripley. Randall and Grace Franklin. 1991. Congress, the Bureaucracy, and Public Policy, fifth ed. Pacific Grove. CA: Brooks/Cole.
Sarbanes, Paul S. 1992. Should Congress Extend Fast Track Negotiating Authority? Congressional Digest (February: 53-55).
Schattschneider, E.E. 1935. Politics, Pressures and the Tariff: A Study of Free Private Enterprise in Pressure Politics, as Shown in the 1929-1930 Revision of the Tariff. New York: Prentice-Hall.
Taylor. Andrew. 1993. Trade: Fast-Track Rules Get House OK. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 26 June: 1638.
U.S. Congress—House. 1993. Statement by Marcy Kaptur (D-OH), 103rd Cong., 1st Sess. Congressional Record 22 June: H3870.
____________ 1991. Committee on Banking, Finance and Urban Affairs. The U.S.-Mexican Free Trade Agreement: Hearing Before the Subcommittee on International Development, Finance, Trade and Monetary Policy of the Committee on Banking. Finance and Urban Affairs. 102nd Cong., 1st Sess., 16 April 1991: 6.
____________ 1991. Committee on Rules. Disapproving the Extension o f Fast Track Procedures to Bills to Implement Trade Agreements Entered Into After May 31, 1991. Report 102-63, Part 1. 102nd Cong., 1st Sess.: 1.
____________ 1991. Committee on Rules. Expressing the Sense o f the House o f Representatives WithRespect to the United States Objectives that Should be Achieved in the Negotiation of Future Trade Agreements. Report 102-64. Part 1. 102nd Cong., 1st Sess., 15 May 1991: 4.
____________ 1991. North American Trade Agreement—Fast Track. 102nd Cong. 1st Sess. Congressional Record 20 May 1991: H3266.
____________ 1991. An Address by Hon. John J. LaFalce Before the Council on the Americas. 102nd Cong., 1st Sess. Congressional Record 23 May 1991: H3504-H3506.
____________ 1973. Shall the President be a Trade Czar? 93rd Cong., 1st Sess. Congressional Record 11 April: 11781.
U.S. Congress—Senate. 1991. Committee on Finance. Disapproving the Request o f the President for Extension of the Fast Track Procedures Under the Omnibus Trade and CompetitivenessAct of 1988 and the Trade Act o f 1974. Report 102-56. 102nd Cong., 1st Sess.: 1.
____________ 1991. Extension of Fast Track Procedures. 102nd Cong., 1st Sess. Congressional Record 16 April: S6559.
U.S. Department of Commerce. 1990. Statistical Abstract o f the United States, 1990: The National Data Book. 110th ed. Washington. DC: Bureau of the Census.
Vogler, David. 1988. The Politics of Congress, fifth ed. Newton, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
The White House, Office o f the Press Secretary. 9 April 1993. Statement by White House Press Secretary Dee Dee Myers on the Decision to Seek Fast Track Renewal
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
