Congressional Caucuses and Congressional Committees: A Commentary on Vega

Authors

  • Thomas Longoria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1993.14.0.381-386

Abstract

This comment on Vega’s article, “Congressional Informal Groups as Representative Responsiveness,” discusses where Vega’s work fits into the congressional caucus literature, and suggests directions for future research on such caucuses. Vega’s work is motivated by an important theory that guides sound empirical analysis. The study is an important break from earlier work because of his use of representation theory to develop the representative responsive-ness framework. Outlining the different strategies used by congressional caucuses to accomplish representational goals expands our understanding of congressional caucuses considerably. The case-study analysis is especially valuable and supports the factor analysis findings.

References

Barnett, Marguerite Ross. 1977. The Congressional Black Caucus: Symbol, Myth, and Reality. The Black Scholar 8: 17-26.

Dilger, Robert Jay. 1982. The Sunbelt/Snowbelt Controversy: The War Over Federal Funds. New York: New York University Press.

Hall, Richard L. and Frank Wayman. 1990. Buying Time: Moneyed Interests and the Mobilization of Bias in Congressional Committees. American Political Science Review 84: 797-820.

Hammond, Susan Webb, Daniel P. Mulhollan, and Arthur G. Stevens, Jr. 1985. Informal Congressional Caucuses and Agenda Setting. Western Political Quarterly 38: 583-605.

Levy, Arthur B. and Susan Stoudinger. 1976. Sources of Voting Cues for the Congressional Black Caucus. Journal of Black Studies 7: 29-45.

Loomis, Burdett A. 1981. Congressional Caucuses and the Politics of Representation. In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered. Washington, DC: Congres-sional Quarterly Press.

Vega, Arturo. 1993. Congressional Informal Groups as Representative Responsiveness. American Review of Politics 14: 355-373.

Downloads

Published

1993-11-01

Issue

Vol. 14: Fall 1993

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.