Changing Ways of Calling for Change: Media Coverage of the 1992 Campaign
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1993.14.0.213-228Abstract
The 1992 Presidential campaign proved to be the ultimate media campaign of the past two decades during which this electioneering mode has dominated American politics. The essay that follows is framed primarily in terms of major foci shaping the mediated aspects of such campaigns, including the framing of the initial campaign and the eventual winnowing of the candidates, press performance and media bias, campaign advertising, and televised debates. In addition, two major elements shaping media coverage that were more or less unique to the 1992 campaign are examined. While tentative efforts were taken by journalists in 1988 and 1990 to mediate candidate-produced messages, the 1992 campaign is the first in which a number of media organizations attempted some systematic efforts in this regard. Moreover, the Ross Perot candidacy was the most important “third-party” candidacy in eight decades, producing a number of changes in the process of media coverage for a Presidential campaign. In sum, from a communication perspective, it was a very interesting campaign, the portents of which are unclear at present.References
Anderson, Jack. 1992a. Democrats Set for '92 'Horton' Attack. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 11 July: 3E.
__________. 1992b. Dirty Fight Ahead in Fall Campaign. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 10 June: 3F.
Barone, Michael. 1992. America's 'Culture Wars' Tradition. U.S. News & World Report 118 (21 Sep-tember): 24.
Blair, Diane D. and Robert L. Savage. 1988. The Appearances of Realignment and Dealignment in Arkansas. In Robert H. Swansbrough and David M. Brodsky, eds., The South's New Politics: Realignment and Dealignment. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press.
Blumenthal, Sidney. 1992. Reporters Grumbling about Lack of Access to Clinton. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 6 June: 14A.
Brummett, John. 1992. The Hipster Wearing the Shades on TV was Real. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 7 June: 5J.
__________. 1993. Using Show Business. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 12 January: 9B.
Collier, Ken and Stuart L. Esrock. 1993. Who Gets What from the Networks? Network Coverage of the 1992 Presidential Primaries. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans.
Dowd, Maureen, 1992. Of Knights and Presidents: Race of Mythic Proportions. New York Times 10 October: A1, A9.
Election Debriefing. 1992. Philadelphia: Annenberg School for Communication, University of Pennsylvania, 12 December. Videocassette.
Entertainment Weekly. 10 July 1992. Everybody?s Talkin?. No. 126: 16-18.
Gergen, David. 1992. Was the Press Unfair to Bush. U.S. News & World Report 118 (9 November): 100.
Golson, Barry, and Peter Ross Range. 1992a. Clinton on TV. TV Guide 40 (21 November): 14-18.
__________. 1992b. Wotta year! TV Guide 40 (November 7): 16-20.
Jackson, John S. III. 1986. The Southernization of National Politics. Plenary address at the Annual Meeting of the Arkansas Political Science Association, North Little Rock.
Lilleston, Randy. 1993. Clinton Revives Campaign Atmosphere. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 3 February: 8A.
Mears, Walter. 1993. Clinton Revisits Favorite Campaign Tactic. The Morning News (Springdale, AR), 13 February.
Nimmo, Dan and James E. Combs. 1992. The Political Pundits. New York: Praeger.
Nimmo, Dan and Robert L. Savage. 1976. Candidates and Their Images: Concepts, Methods, and Findings. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear.
Norberg, Bob. 1992. Stations Pull Ad Questioning Clinton Stand on Gay Rights. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 10 October: 12A.
Oman, Noel. 1992. Reporters Grumbling about Lack of Access to Clinton. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 6 June: 14A.
Public Perspective, The. 1993. Problems in Exit Polling: Interviews with Warren J. Mitofsky and John Brennan. The Public Perspective 4 (January/February): 19-23.
Rindy, Dean. 1992. Ads Don't Change: Candidates Do. Campaigns & Elections 13 (July): 55.
Ruszay-Sedille, Kathleen C. 1993. 1988-1992: Has Anything Changed? A Comparative Analysis of Newspaper Coverage of the Presidential Elections. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Southwestern Political Science Association, New Orleans.
Savage, Robert L. 1986. Statesmanship, Surfacing, and Sometimes Stumbling: Constructing Candidate Images During the Early Campaign. Political Communication Review 11: 43-57.
Solomon, John. 1992. Maverick Ads Spice Up Voting Season. Arkansas Democrat-Gazette 1 November: 21A.
Trent, Judith S. 1978. Presidential Surfacing: The Ritualistic and Crucial First Act. Communication Monographs 45: 281-292.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
