Different Arenas, Different Attitudes: Partisan Inconsistency in the Canadian Federal System
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1992.13.0.465-486Abstract
Party identification occupies a prominent place in contemporary theory and empirical research. Although its dimensions, sources, and implications for political choice have received considerable attention, the effect of political-institutional contexts on partisan attachments remains largely unexplored. We examine the patterns of such attachments in a system with differing arenas of citizen participation, government responsiveness, and political parties at the national and subnational levels. We suggest that a confluence of long- and short-term forces operates to influence partisan attitudes at both levels of government, and that these attitudes, net of other factors, are important determinants of public issue concerns, leader evaluations, and electoral choice. The correlates and consequences of partisan inconsistency in contemporary Canada are assessed using survey data from a series of studies conducted during the past two decades.References
Aitkin, Don. 1977. Stability and Change in Australian Politics. New York: St. Martin's.
Aldrich, John and Forrest Nelson. 1984. Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Archer, Keith. 1987. A Simultaneous Equation Model of Canadian Voting Behaviour. Canadian Journal of Political Science 20: 553-72.
Beam, David R., Timothy J. Conlan and David B. Walker. 1983. Federalism: The Challenge of Conflicting Theories and Contemporary Practice. In Ada W. Finifter, ed., Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington: American Political Science Association.
Belknap, George and Angus Campbell. 1952. Political Party Identification and Attitudes toward Foreign Policy. Public Opinion Quarterly 15: 601-23.
Bell, David and Lome Tepperman. 1979. The Roots of Disunity: A Look at Canadian Political Culture. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart.
Blake, Donald E. 1982.The Consistency of Inconsistency: Party Identification in Federal and Provincial Politics. Canadian J our nal of Political Science 15: 691-710.
_______, et al. 1985. Two Political Worlds: Parties and Voting in British Columbia.. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.
Bowler, Shaun. 1990. Consistency and Inconsistency in Canadian Party Identifications: Towards an Institutional Approach. Electoral Studies 9: 133-46.
Campbell, Angus, Philip E. Converse, Warren E. Miller and Donald E. Stokes. 1960. The American Voter. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
_______eds. 1966. Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Clarke, Harold D. 1983. The Parti Quebecois and Sources of Partisan Realignment in Contemporary Quebec. Journal of Politics 44: 64-85.
_______, Jane Jenson, Lawrence LeDuc and Jon H. Pammett. 1979. Political Choice in Canada. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
_______. 1991. Absent Mandate: Interpreting Change in Canadian Elections. 2nd ed. Toronto: Gage.
Clarke, Harold D. and Allan Komberg. 1992. Risky Business: Partisan Volatility and
Electoral Choice in Canada, 1988. Electoral Studies 11: 138-56.
_______. 1993. Evaluations and Evolution: Public Attitudes Toward Canada's Federal Political Parties, 1965-1991. Canadian Journal of Political Science 26: forthcoming.
_______and Marianne C. Stewart. 1992. Canada. In Charles D. Ameringer, ed., Political Parties of The Americas, 1980s to 1990s. Westport: Greenwood Press.
Clarke, Harold D., Jon H. Pammett and Marianne C. Stewart. 1992. The Forest for the Trees: Regions and Political Beliefs in Contemporary Canada. In Robert MacDermid, ed., The Canadian National Election Studies. Toronto: Oxford University Press.
Clarke, Harold D. and Marianne C. Stewart. 1985. Short-Term Forces and Partisan Change in Canada, 1974-80. Electoral Studies 4: 15-35.
_______. 1987. Partisan Inconsistency and Partisan Change in Federal States: The Case of Canada. American Journal of Political Science 31: 383-407.
Converse, Philip E. 1966. On the Possibility of Major Political Realignment in the South. In Angus Campbell et al., eds., Elections and the Political Order. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
Elkins, David J. and Richard Simeon. 1980. Small Worlds: Provinces and Parties in Canadian Political Life. Toronto: Methuen.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Franklin, Charles H. 1992. Measurement and the Dynamics of Party Identification. Political Behavior 14: 297-310.
Hadley, Charles D. 1985. Dual Partisan Identification in the South. Journal of Politics 47: 254-69.
Irving, John A. 1959. The Social Credit Movement in Alberta. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Jackson, Robert J. and Doreen Jackson. 1990. Politics in Canada: Culture, Institutions, Behaviour and Public Policy, 2nd ed. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall.
Jennings, M. Kent and Richard G. Niemi. 1966. Party Identification at Multiple Levels of Government American Journal of Sociology 72: 86-101.
Johnston, Richard. 1992. Party Identification Measures in the Anglo-American Democracies: A National Survey Experiment. American Journal of Political Science 36: 542-59.
Komberg, Allan and Harold D. Clarke. 1992. Citizens and Community: Political Support in a Representative Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Komberg, Allan, William Mishler and Harold D. Clarke. 1982. Representative Democracy in The Canadian Provinces. Scarborough: Prentice-Hall.
Lambert, Ronald D., James E. Curtis, Steven D. Brown and Barry J. Kay. 1986. Effects of Identification with Governing Parties on Feelings of Political Efficacy and Trust. Canadian Journal of Political Science 19: 705-28.
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1968. Agrarian Socialism: The Cooperative Commonwealth Federation in Saskatchewan. New York: Doubleday.
Macpherson, C.B. 1953. Democracy in Alberta: The Theory andPractice of a Quasi-Party System. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Martinez, Michael D. 1990. Partisan Reinforcement in Context and Cognition: Canadian Federal Partisanships, 1974-79. American Journal of Political Science 34: 822- 45.
McRoberts, Kenneth. 1988. Quebec: Social Change and Political Crisis, 3rd ed. Toronto:McClelland and Stewart.
Niemi, Richard G., Stephen Wright and Lynda W. Powell. 1987. Multiple Party Identifiers and the Measurement of Party Identification Journal of Politics 49: 1093-104.
Schwartz, Mildred A. 1974. Politics and Territory: The Sociology of Regional Persistence in Canada. Montreal: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Simeon, Richard and David J. Elkins. 1974. Regional Political Cultures in Canada Canadian Journal of Political Science 7: 397-437.
Stevenson, Garth. 1989. Unfulfilled Union: Canadian Federalism andNational Unity, 3rd ed. Agincourt: Gage.
Stewart, Marianne C., Allan Komberg, Harold D. Clarke and Alan Acock. 1992. Arenas and Attitudes: A Note on Political Efficacy in a Federal System. Journal of Politics 54: 179-96.
Uslaner, Eric M. 1989. Multiple Party Identifiers in Canada: Participation and Affect. Journal of Politics 51: 993-1003.
_______ . 1990. Splitting Image: Partisan Affiliations in Canada's 'Two Political Worlds.' American Journal of Political Science 34: 961-81.
Wilson, John. 1974. The Canadian Political Cultures: Towards a Redefinition of the Nature of the Canadian Political System. Canadian J our nal ofPolitical Science 7: 438-84.
Young, Walter D. 1969. The Anatomy of a Party: The National CCF1932-1961. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.
