Prescriptive Committee Seats in Congress
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1992.13.0.285-308Abstract
This research updates earlier work done on the phenomenon of prescriptive committee seats in the U.S. House of Representatives, and extends the investigation to the control of committee seats by state delegations in the U.S. Senate. The theoretical underpinning of the phenomenon also is updated to reflect the literature on congressional informal groups that has grown up since the phenomenon of state party delegation prescriptive committee seats first was identified. Here the incidence of the phenomenon is found to be strong and broadly similar in both houses during the period 1947-1988, although important interchamber differences were found to emerge along several dimensions.References
Arnold, R. Douglas. 1979. Congress and the Bureaucracy: A Theory of Influence,. New Haven: Yale University.
Asher, Herbert B. 1973. The Learning of Legislative Norms. American Political Science Review 67 (June): 499-513.
Barone, Michael, and Grant Ufijusa. 1987. The Almanac of American Politics, 1988. Washington, DC: National Journal.
Brady, David W., and Charles S. Bullock, EL 1981. Coalition Politics in the House of Representatives. In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Bullock, Charles S., HI. 1971. The Influence of State Party Delegations on House Committee Assignments. Midwest Journal of Political Science 15: 525-546.
_______ . 1972. House Careerists: Changing Patterns of Longevity and Attrition. American Political Science Review 66: 1295-1300.
_______. 1976. Motivations for U.S. Congressional Committee Preferences: Freshmen of the 92nd Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 1: 201-212.
_______. 1985. U.S. Senate Committee Assignments: Preferences, Motivations, and Success. American Journal of Political Science 29:789-808.
Cooper, Ann. 1979. Budget is In, Ethics Out in Congressional Shopping for Committee Assignments. Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report 37: 155-156.
Copeland, Gaiy W. 1987. Seniority and Committee Transfers: Career Planning in the Contemporary House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 49: 553-564.
Deckard, Barbara. 1972. State Party Delegations in the U.S. House of Representatives. Journal of Politics 34: 199-222.
England, David E., and Charles S. Bullock, HI. 1986. Prescriptive Seats Revisited. American Journal of Political Science 30: 496-502.
Evans, Diana Yiannakis. 1986. Sunbelt versus Frostbelt: The Evolution of Regional Conflict over Federal Aid to Cities in the House of Representatives. Social Science Quarterly 67: 108-117.
Fenno, Richard F. 1973. Congressmen in Committee. Boston: Little Brown.
Fiellin, Alan. 1962. Functions of Informal Groups in Legislative Institutions: A Case Study. Journal of Politics 24: 72-91.
Fiorina, Morris P. 1978. Congress: Keystone of the Washington Establishment. New Haven: Yale University.
_______ and Roger G. Noll. 1979. Majority Rule Models and Legislative Elections. Journal of Politics 41: 1081-1104.
Hammond, Susan W. 1990. Committee and Informal Leaders in the U.S. House of Representatives. In J.J. Komacki, ed. Leading Congress: New Styles, New Strategies. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Kingdon, John W. 1981. Congressmens Voting Decisions, 2nd ed. New York: Harper and Row.
Loomis, Burdett A. 1981. Congressional Caucuses and the Politics of Representation. In Lawrence C. Dodd and Bruce I. Oppenheimer, eds., Congress Reconsidered, 2nd ed. Washington DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
_______ . 1988. The New American Politician. New York: Basic Books.
Matthews, Donald R. 1960. U.S. Senators and Their World. New York: Vintage.
Omstein, Norman J., Thomas E. Mann, Michael J. Malbin, Allen Schick, and John F. Bibby. 1984. Vital Statistics on Congress, 1984-1985. Washington, DC: American Enterprise Institute.
Parker, Glenn R. and Suzanne L. Parker. 1985. Factions in House Committees. Knoxville: University of Tennessee Press.
Polsby, Nelson W. 1968. The Institutionalization of the U.S. House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 62: 1144-168.
Ray, Bruce A. and Steven S. Smith. 1984. Committee Size in the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly 9: 679-695.
Sinclair, Barbara Deckard. 1977. Who Wins in the House of Representative: The Effect of Declining Party Cohesion on Policy Outputs, 1959-1970. Social Science Quarterly 58: 121-128.
Smith, Steven S. and Christopher J.Deering. 1984. Committees inCongress. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Stanley, Harold W. and Richard G. Niemi. 1988. Vital Statistics on American Politics. Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Truman, David B. 1956. The State Delegation and the Representatives. American Political Science Review 50: 1023-1045.
Westefield, Louis P. 1974. Majority Party Leadership and the Committee System in the House of Representatives. American Political Science Review 68: 1593-1604
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.