Change and Democratization in One-Party Systems

Authors

  • Harold F. Bass

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1991.12.0.65-79

Abstract

This analysis of one-party systems in three different settings — the American South, the Eastern Bloc, and the Third World - ponders the circumstance that both interparty competition and intraparty competition among subparty components (organization, office, and electorate) are on the rise in all three settings. This bodes well for the chances of democracy in each setting, regardless of whether one expects to find democracy in between the parties, as Schattschneider did, or expects that democracy should order the parties internally, as classical democratic theorists do. The analysis also commends Southern leadership succession institutions (competitive primaries and run-offs) as devices for attaining democracy while still in the one-party mode, and credits broader, pervasive structural and politocultural features of the American polity for the workability of those institutions.

References

Apter, David. 1965. The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

______________ . 1970. Some Reflections on the Role of a Political Opposition in New Nations. In Irving Leonard Markovitz, ed., African Politics and Society. New York: Free Press.

Bass, Harold F. and Andrew Westmoreland. 1984. Parties and Campaigns in Contemporary Arkansas Politics. Arkansas Political Science Journal 5: 38-58.

Bibby, John F. 1979. Political Parties and Federalism: The Republican National Committee. Publius 10: 229-236.

______________ , Cornelius P. Cotter, James L. Gibson, and Robert J. Huckshom. 1983. Parties in State Politics. In Virginia Gray, Herbert Jacob, and Kenneth N. Vines, eds., Politics in the American States, 4th ed. Boston: Little, Brown.

Brown, Archie. 1982. Leadership Succession and Policy Innovation. In Archie Brown and Michael Kaser, eds., Soviet Policy in the 1980s. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Bunce, Valerie. 1980. The Succession Connection: Policy Cycles and Political Change in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe. American Political Science Review 74: 966-77.

______________ and Philip G. Roeder. 1986. The Effects of Leadership Succession in the Soviet Union. American Political Science Review 80: 215-24.

Committee on Political Parties, American Political Science Association. Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System. American Political Science Review 44: Supplement.

Cotter, Cornelius P., James L. Gibson, John F. Bibby, and Robert J. Huckshom. 1984. Party Organizations in American Politics. New York: Praeger.

Dittmer, Lowell. 1990. Patterns of Elite Strife and Succession in Chinese Politics. China Quarterly 123: 405-30.

Emerson, Rupert. 1960. From Empire to Nation: The Rise to Self-Assertion of Asian and African Peoples. Boston: Beacon Press.

______________. 1963. Nation-Building in Africa. In Karl W. Deutsch and William J. Foltz, eds., Nation-Building. New York: Atherton.

______________. 1966. Parties and National Integration in Africa. In Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner, eds., Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Esherick, Joseph W., and Elizabeth J. Perry. 1983. Leadership Succession in the People's Republic of China: "Crisis" or Opportunity? Studies in Comparative Communism 16: 171-78.

Harrison, Richard W. 1979. The Question of Soviet Succession. Journal o f Social and Political Studies 4: 99-122.

Hofstadter, Richard. 1969. The Idea o f a Party System: The Rise o f Legitimate Opposition in the United States, 1780-1840. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Key, V.O., Jr. 1964. Politics, Parties, and Pressure Groups, 5 th ed. New York: Crowell.

_____________ , with the assistance of Alexander Heard. 1949. Southern Politics inState and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

Kilson, Martin L. 1963. Authoritarian and Single Party Tendencies in African Politics. World Politics 5: 262-94.

Kirkpatrick, Evron M. 1971. Toward a More Responsible Two Party System: Political Science, Policy Science, or Pseudo-Science? American Political Science Review 65: 965-990. '

Legum, Colin. 1990. The Coming of Africa's Second Independence. The Washington Quarterly 13: 129-40.

Leiserson, Avery. 1957. The Place of Parties in the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 51: 943-54.

Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political Man: The Social Bases o f Politics. GardenCity, N.Y.: Doubleday Anchor.

Michels, Robert. 1962. Political Parties. New York: Free Press.

Nkrumah, Kwame. 1961. I Speak of Freedom. New York: Praeger.

Ostrogorski, Moisei. 1964. Democracy and the Organization of Political Parties. Edited and abridged by S.M. Lipset. New York: Anchor.

Roeder, Philip G. 1985. Do New Leaders Really Make a Difference? Rethinking the Succession Question. American Political Science Review 79: 958-76.

Roth, David F., and Frank L. Wilson. 1976. The Comparative Study of Politics. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart.

Scott, Ruth K., and Ronald J. Hrebenar. 1979. Parties inCrisis: Party Politics in America. New York: Wiley.

Sorauf, Frank J., and Paul Allen Beck. 1988. Party Politics in America, 6th ed. Glenville, Illinois: Scott, Foresman.

Wallerstein, Immanuel. 1966. The Decline of the Party in Single-Party African States. In Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner, eds., Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Wekkin, Gary D. 1985. Political Parties and Intergovernmental Relations in 1984: Consequences of Party Renewal for Territorial Constituencies. Publius 15: 19-37.

Wilson, I., and Y. Ji. 1990. Leadership by "Lines:" China's Unresolved Succession. Problems of Communism 39: 28-44.

Zaninovich, M. George. 1983. Yugoslav Succession and Leadership Stability. Studies in Comparative Communism 16: 179-90.

Downloads

Published

1991-11-01

Issue

Vol. 12: Autumn 1991

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.