The Legacy of State Constitutional Conventions

Authors

  • Arthur English
  • John J. Carroll

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15763/issn.2374-7781.1983.4.0.65-68

Abstract

Constitutional conventions are ephemeral institutions in a state's political system. Usually they meet for only a few months and their impact on the system is commonly measured by whether the draft document they produce is adopted in the ratifying election (Goodman, et al., August, 1973, pp.571-596). The purpose of this research is to investigate whether constitutional conventions leave a larger legacy by (a) serving as a recruitment vehicle by which delegates move to other elective offices and by (b) seeding the state with a continuing constitutionally attentive elite. These are particularly crucial questions for understanding the impact of constitutional conventions in states where draft documents were defeated. We have data from the two most recent efforts at comprehensive constitutional reform in Arkansas. Both the 1969-70 and 1979-80 Arkansas constitutional conventions produced substantial revisions of the existing 1874 Constitution which were rejected by the electorate. We interviewed 80 of 95 lining delegates to the 1969-70 convention and 59 of 98 living delegates to the 1979-80 convention. A mail questionnaire yielded 60 responses from delegates to the earlier convention. An additional 20 interviews were completed by phone. All of the 1979-80 delegates responded to the mail questionnaire.

References

Cornwall , Jr. , Elmer E. , Jay S. Goodman and Wayne R. Swanson (1974). Constitutional Conventions: The Politics of Revision. New York: National Municipal League.

English, Arthur and John J . Carrol (May, 1982). "Constitutional Reform in Arkansas: The 1979-80 Convention," National Civic Revieu, Vol. 71, No. 5.

____________ "Prospectives on Continuing Constitutional Activism: The Case of the 1969-70 Arkansas Convention Delegates, " Arkansas Political Journal, Vol. I .

Friedman, Robert S. and Sybil Stokes (May, 1965). "The Role of the Constitution-maker as Representative, "Midjest Journal of Political Science, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Goodman, Jay S., et al . (August , 1973). "Public Responses to State Constitutional Revision," American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 17, No. 3.

Ledbetter, Jr. , Calvin R., et al. (1972). Politics in Arkansas: The Constitutional Experience. Little Rock: Academic Press of Arkansas.

Swanson, Wayne R., Sean A. Kelleher and Arthur English (February, 1972). "Socialization of Constitution-Makers: Political Experience, Role Conflict, and Attitude Change," Journal of Politics , Vol. 34, No. 1.

The Book of States., Lexington, Kentucky: Council of State Governments.

Thompson, William H. (August, 1976). "An Analysis of the Legislative Ambitions of State Constitutional Convention Delegates," Western Political Quarterly, Vol. 39, No. 3.

Downloads

Published

1984-01-01

Issue

Vol. 4: Winter 1983

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.

  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.

  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:

    1. Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;

    2. Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;

    3. Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.

with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.

  1. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.

  3. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.

  1. The Author represents and warrants that:

    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;

    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;

    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;

    4. the Work has not previously been published;

    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and

    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.

  2. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.