“Family Values Don’t Stop at the Rio Grande . . .”: Can the Republican Party Convert Hispanic Voters?
Keywords:Hispanic, Republican Party, moral values, referenda
As the Hispanic community becomes increasingly important in American politics there are competing views about whether they can be converted to the Republican Party. One perspective argues that Hispanics’ religion and traditional social values makes them natural constituents of the Republican Party. Alternatively, Hispanics are primarily concerned about issues promoting their well-being and topics such as moral values or religion are private. We use a novel approach to test whether traditional social values might attract Hispanic voters to the Republican Party. Using exit poll results for ballot propositions on moral issues from Arizona, Colorado, and Florida we find weak evidence that traditional values will convert Hispanics to the Republican Party. Instead, our results indicate that traditional social values issues reinforce the polarization between the two parties.
Abrajano, Marisa, R. Michael Alvarez, and Jonathan Nagler 2008. “The Hispanic Vote in the 2004 Presidential Election: Insecurity and Moral Values,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 70, No. 2, April.
Abrajano, Marisa and R. Michael Alvarez 2011. “Hispanic Public Opinion and Partisanship In America,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 126, No. 2.
Abrajano, Marisa and Zoltan Hajnal 2015. White Backlash: Immigration, Race, and American Politics, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Abramowitz, Alan and Kyle Saunders. 2006. “Exploring the Bases of Partisanship in the American Electorate: Social Identity vs. Ideology,” Political Research Quarterly, Vol 9, No. 2, (June).
Alvarez, R. Michael and Lisa Garcia Bedolla 2003. “The Foundations of Latino Voter Partisanship: Evidence from the 2000 Election,” The Journal of Politics, Vol. 65, No. 1, (February).
Barreto, Matt and Gary Segura, 2014. Latino America: How America’s Most Dynamic Population is Poised to Transform the Politics of the Nation, Public Affairs Publisher, New York.
Bowler, Shaun, Stephen Nicholson, and Gary Segura 2006. “Earthquakes and Aftershocks: Race, Direct Democracy, and Partisan Change,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 50, No. 1, January.
Campbell, Angus, Philip Converse, Warren Miller, and Donald Stokes, 1960. The American Voter, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
Campbell, Kristina A. 2011. “The Road to S.B. 1070: How Arizona Became Ground Zero for the Immigrants’ Rights Movement and the Continuing Struggle for Latino Civil Rights in America,” Harvard Latino Law Review, Vol. 14.
Claussen, Ryan L. 2004. “Political Opinion and Distinctiveness: The Case of Hispanic Ethnicity,” Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 57, No. 4, December.
Davison, Donald L. and Michael Krassa 2011. “The Myth of the Catholic Vote: The Influence of Ideology and Theology on Catholics in Presidential Elections, 1972-2008,” Journal of Religion and Society, October, Vol. 13.
Fiorina, Morris 1981. Retrospective Voting in American National Elections, New Haven: Yale University Press.
Frey, William. 2015. Diversity Explosion: How New Racial Demographics are Remaking America, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Green, John, C., James Guth, Corwin Smidt, and Lyman Kellstedt 1996. Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front, Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefield.
Gonzalez, Mike 2014. “Conservatives, Hispanics, and the Immigrant Experience,” National Affairs, No. 21, Fall.
Hajnal, Zoltan and Michael Rivera. 2014. “Immigration, Latinos, and White Partisan Politics: The New Democratic Defection,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 58, No. 4, 2014.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., John C. Green, James L. Guth, and Corwin W. Smidt 1994. “Religious Voting Blocs in the 1992 Election: The Year of the Evangelical?” Sociology of Religion, Vol 55, No 3: 307-326.
Kiewiet, M. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kinder, Donald and Nicholas Winter 2001. “Exploring the Racial Divide: Blacks, Whites, and Opinion on National Policy,” American Journal of Political Science, 45 (2).
Layman, Geoffrey C. and Edward G. Carmines 1997a. “Cultural Conflict in American Politics: Religious Traditionalism, Postmaterialism, and U.S. Political Behavior.” The Journal of Politics, Vol 59, No 3: 751-77.
Layman, Geoffrey C. 1997b. “Religion and Political Behavior in the United States: The Impact of Beliefs, Affiliations, and Commitment from 1980 to 1994.” The Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol 61, No 2: 288-316.
Layman, Geoffrey 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Political Parties. New York: Columbia University Press.
McDaniel, Eric L. and Christopher Ellison 2008. “God’s Party? Race, Religion, and Partisanship Over Time,” Political Research Quarterly, Vol. 61, No. 2 (June).
MacKuen, Michael, Robert Erikson, and James Stimson, 1989. “Macropartisanship,” American Political Science Review, 83(4): 1125-42.
National Conference of State Legislatures 2006. “Immigration Policy: 2006 State Legislation Related to Immigration: Enacted and Vetoed,” October 31, 2006.
National Election Pool Poll # 2000, 2004, 2008-STELEC-AZ: Arizona Election Day Exit Poll, Edison Media Research/Mitofsky International. Sponsor: National Election Pool (ABC News/AssociatedPress/CBS News/CNN/Fox News/NBC News).
Nicholson, Stephen P. and Gary M. Segura 2005. “Issue Agendas and the Politics of Latino Partisan Identification,” in Diversity and Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, edited by Gary Segura and Shaun Bowler, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Putnam, Robert D. and David E. Campbell. 2010. American Grace: How Religion Divides and Unites Us. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Reich, Gary and Jay Barth 2012. “Immigration Restriction in the States: Pushing the Boundaries of Federalism,” unpublished paper presented at the State Politics and Policy Conference, Houston, TX.
Republican National Committee 2013. The Growth and Opportunity Project, March 17, Washington, D.C.
Uhlaner, Carole J. and F. Chris Garcia 2005. “Learning Which Party Fits: Experience, Ethnic Identity, and the Demographic Foundations of Latino Party Identification,” in Diversity and Democracy: Minority Representation in the United States, edited by Gary Segura and Shaun Bowler, Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press.
Valentino, Nicholas and David Sears 2005. “Old Times There Are Not Forgotten: Race and Partisan Realignment in the Contemporary South,” American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 49, No. 3 (Jul., 2005).
Voter News Service. VOTER NEWS SERVICE GENERAL ELECTION EXIT POLL, 1996, 2000, 2004, 2008 (Colorado and Florida) [Computer file]. ICPSR version. New York, NY: Voter News Service [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Voter News Service. Voter News Service General Election Exit Polls, 1996. (Arizona), ICPSR06989-v2. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 2011-07-06.
Authors who publish with American Review of Politics agree to the following terms:
The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
Attribution: other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
Non-Commercial: the materials may not be used for commercial purposes;
Share Alike: If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a pre-publication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (see The Effect of Open Access). Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
The Author represents and warrants that:
the Work is the Author’s original work;
the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
the Work has not previously been published;
the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.